2864
Nickolaisen et al.: Photolysis of dichlorine monoxide
lowing excited states: 1 1A1 , 2 1A1 , 1 1B1 , 2 1B1 , 1 1B2 ,
2 1B2 , 1 1A2 , 2 1A2 , 1 3A1 , 2 3A1 , 1 3B1 , 2 3B1 , 1 3B2 ,
1 3B2 , 1 3A2 , and 2 3A2 . State-averaged orbitals were used
for each of the different space and spin symmetries in
order to avoid bias towards the lower energy states. First,
eight separate two-state CASSCF ͑14 in 9͒ calculations
7.345 eV for the 2 1B1 state. The peak observed at 4.88 eV is
consistent with the 1 1B2 state calculated to be at 4.983 eV.
Examination of the computed oscillator strengths indicates
that these two states should indeed have the strongest absorp-
tions in agreement with the observed spectrum. However, the
ordering is reversed—ab initio results predict the 1 1B2 state
to have a slightly larger absorption cross section relative to
the 2 1B1 state whereas the experimental spectrum indicates
a larger oscillator strength for the higher energy state.
The computed oscillator strengths indicate that the next
strongest absorption following the two large features is the
transition to the 1 1B1 state. The calculated energy of this
transition is 3.419 eV which does not directly correlate with
any features of the observed absorption spectrum. However,
the shoulder to the low energy side of the 254 nm peak is of
sufficient strength that this feature most likely arises from the
1 1B1←1 1A1 transition. If this is indeed the case, then the
calculated transition energy of this state is low by several
tenths of an eV. The transition to the 2 1A1 state at 5.453 eV
also has sufficient oscillator strength to be observed experi-
mentally, but this absorption is buried in the shoulder of the
large feature at 7.24 eV.
1
were performed for (X A1ϩ2 1A1), (1 1B1ϩ2 1B1),
(1 1B2ϩ2 1B2), (1 1A2ϩ2 1A2), (1 3A1ϩ2 3A1), (1 3B1
ϩ2 3B1), (1 3B2ϩ2 3B2), and (1 3A2ϩ2 3A2). The MOs
from each of these calculations were then used in MRCISD
calculations for the two states; e.g., the MOs from the
(1 1B2ϩ2 1B2) CASSCF calculation were used to calculate
the energies of the first and second 1B2 states at the
MRCISD level.
Transition dipole moments ͑and hence oscillator
strengths͒ between the lowest-energy state and each higher
state, within both the singlet and triplet manifolds, were cal-
culated at the MRCISD/cc-pVTZ level, as shown in Table
III. It is necessary to employ the same orbitals for both states
involved in each transition.19 Thus to obtain orbitals aver-
aged over both the lower and upper state required a
further three-state CASSCF ͑14 in 9͒ calculation, i.e.,
1
1
1
(X A1ϩ1 1B1ϩ2 1B1), (X A1ϩ1 1B2ϩ2 1B2), (X A1
ϩ1 1A2ϩ2 1A2), (1 3B1ϩ1 3A1ϩ2 3A1), (1 3B1ϩ1 3B2
ϩ2 3B2), and (1 3B1ϩ1 3A2ϩ2 3A2), unless the upper and
lower states were already of the same symmetry. To calculate
the transition dipole moment for the transition
(2 3A2←1 3B1), for example, an MRCISD wave function for
each state was determined using the orbitals from the
(1 3B1ϩ1 3A2ϩ2 3A2) calculation. Since the three-state
CASSCF calculations give orbitals that are less well adapted
to each individual state than are those from the two-state
CASSCF calculations, the resulting energies are slightly less
satisfactory for each state. However, comparison of the tran-
sition energies in Tables II and III reveals no significant dif-
ferences. Moreover, it was found that very similar results
were obtained for transition energies and oscillator strengths
at the CASSCF level using either the ͑14 in 9͒ or the larger
͑20 in 12͒ active space, and with either the cc-pVTZ or the
smaller cc-pVDZ basis; these findings ͑not shown͒ confirm
the essential reliability of the results presented.
The weak absorption peaks at 2.3 and 2.9 eV cannot be
assigned to singlet←singlet transitions because the 1 1B1
state is the lowest excited state in the singlet manifold, and
the energy of this state is substantially higher than the ob-
served transition energies of these two features. The 2.9 eV
peak corresponds to a spin forbidden transition to the lowest
lying triplet state, 1 3B1 . The oscillator strength for this
triplet←singlet transition was not determined in this study,
but this assignment is consistent with the calculated transi-
tion energy of 2.625 eV and the small absorption cross sec-
tion of 1ϫ10Ϫ20 cm2 expected for a forbidden transition such
as this. However, that excitation of this triplet state occurs is
an indication that the 1 3B1 state is not strictly triplet in
nature, but rather has a mixed configuration containing some
singlet character. The very weak feature at 2.3 eV cannot be
assigned to a transition from the ground electronic state since
the excitation energy is significantly lower than any of the
calculated excited state energies in either the singlet or triplet
manifolds. This absorption may arise from a transition be-
tween two excited electronic states where the lower lying
state is prepared by excitation from the ground state.
The lowest energy triplet state calculated was 1 3B1 . The
predominant configuration in the MRCISD vector for this
state corresponds to an excitation from the (3b1)2 nonbond-
ing orbital of the Hartree–Fock ground state to the
C. ClO formation kinetics
0
*
(10a1) ͑ClO͒ antibonding orbital. The transition with the
largest oscillator strength is 2 3A2←1 3B1 ; this transition
corresponds to excitation of an electron from the doubly oc-
cupied (2a2)2 orbital in the 1 3B1 state to the singly occu-
pied (3b1)1 orbital.
Our experiments focused on the production of ClO from
the broadband pulsed photolysis of Cl2O using different pho-
tolytic spectral distributions extending from the visible to
200 nm. The ClO time dependence was dominated by two
major effects: The kinetics of ClO formation which, when
photolyzed at longer wavelengths, were determined prima-
rily by the excited state dynamics of Cl2O and the kinetics of
ClO removal which were dominated by ClO self-reaction.
These processes will be discussed below.
The computed vertical excitation energies and oscillator
strengths of Table III may be used to interpret the observed
Cl2O absorption spectrum shown in Fig. 1. The experimental
spectrum has five prominent features in the region of interest
to this study—absorption peaks at 171 nm ͑7.24 eV͒, 254 nm
͑4.88 eV͒, 420 nm ͑2.9 eV͒, and 540 nm ͑2.3 eV͒, and a
shoulder on the 254 nm peak at 300 nm ͑4.1 eV͒. The largest
peak at 7.24 eV correlates well with the calculated energy of
The time dependence of ClO production was influenced
strongly by the spectral domain of the photolysis radiation,
the bath gas pressure and the bath gas identity. Restricting
J. Chem. Phys., Vol. 104, No. 8, 22 February 1996
128.42.202.150 On: Mon, 24 Nov 2014 05:04:06