Benincori et al.
Preparation of 2,5-Dimethyl-3,4-bis[(2R,5R)-2,5-di-
methylphospholano]thiophene (1) (UlluPHOS). n-BuLi
(0.79 mL of a 1.6 M solution in hexane) was added to a stirred
solution of 2,5-dimethyl-3,4-bis(diphosphino)thiophene (2) (0.11
g) in THF (12 mL) at room temperature. The solution was left
stirring for 1.5 h and then a THF solution (1.2 mL) of (2S,5S)-
hexanediol cyclic sulfate (0.23 mg) was added. After 2 h of
stirring, n-BuLi (0.87 mL of a 1.6 M solution in hexane) was
added to the mixture at room temperature. The solution was
stirred for 12 h and then MeOH (0.2 mL) was added. The
solvent was removed under reduced pressure and the solid
residue was treated with degassed CH2Cl2 and filtered under
argon atmosphere, and the filtrate was evaporated to dryness
to give a solid which was crystallized from MeOH to give 1
(0.19 g) in a pure state (70% yield): 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 0.99
(6H, m), 1.15 (6H, m), 1.20-1.52 (4H, m), 1.94-2.2 (4H, m),
2.42 (6H + 2H, s superimposed to a m), 3.02 (2H, m); 13C NMR
(CDCl3) δ 16.5, 18.6, 20.8 (t, J ) 11.5 Hz), 29.6, 34.1 (t, J )
6.1 Hz), 36.1 (t, J ) 3.4 Hz), 37.9, 136.6, 137.9; 31P NMR
(CDCl3) δ 5.6 (s); [R]25D ) + 54.2 (c ) 1, CHCl3); PM (MS) 444.
Anal. Calcd for C18H26P2S: C, 72.95; H, 5.90. Found: C, 73.11;
H, 5.77.
X-ray analysis and theoretical calculations) very similar
to those found for Me-DuPHOS but quite higher elec-
tronic availability at phosphorus (E°p) relative to the
latter ligand. (iv) The facial recognition and enantiose-
lection associated with Rh and Ru complexes of Ullu-
PHOS and Me-DuPHOS were shown to be similarly high
in several typical test hydrogenation reactions. (v) Pre-
liminary data suggest that olefin hydrogenation reactions
promoted by catalysts bearing UlluPHOS are qualita-
tively faster than those using analogous catalysts of Me-
DuPHOS. (vi) The promising results obtained with
UlluPHOS suggest the extension of the hetero-DuPHOS
family by applying this structural design to other electron-
rich heterocycles, pyrrole in particular, for which the
introduction of the phosphorus atoms could be even easier
than that demonstrated in the case of thiophene.7
Experimental Section
Unless otherwise specified, all solvents and reagents were
reagent grade and used without purification. 1H NMR spectra
were recorded as solutions in CDCl3 on 200 or 300 MHz
spectrometers. All reactions were performed using standard
Schlenk-type techniques. For the preparations of the com-
plexes and the hydrogenation reactions, solvents degassed
under argon were employed. Hydrogenation reactions were
carried out in a stirred (550 rpm), 100 mL, hastelloy autoclave,
equipped with a sampling pipe extending to the bottom of the
vessel.
Preparation of 2,5-Dimethyl-3,4-bis(diethoxyphos-
phoryl)thiophene (3). A solution of 2,5-dimethyl-3,4-diiodo-
thiophene10 (4.0 g) in triethyl phosphite (15 mL) was dropped
under a N2 atmosphere in 2 h into a stirred suspension of
palladium acetate (0.98 g) in triethyl phosphite (20 mL) at 140
°C. The reaction was heated at 140 °C for further 3 h and then
excess triethyl phosphite was removed in a vacuum. The oily
residue was extracted with five 10-mL portions of heptane,
and the combined extracts were evaporated to dryness to give
an oil which was chromatographed (eluant, AcOEt/EtOH 9:1)
to give 3 (1.4 g) as a colorless oil (48% yield). A sample was
purified by distillation under reduced pressure (bp 170-175
°C at 3 Torr) to give 3 as a colorless, low-melting solid which
was crystallized from pentane (mp 35 °C): 1H NMR (CDCl3)
δ 1.78 (t, 12H, J ) 53.6 Hz), 3.12 (d, 6H, J ) 1.6 Hz), 4. 58 (m,
8H); 13C NMR (CDCl3) δ 16.4 (t, J ) 6.7 Hz), 53.7, 62.0 (d, J
) 10.6 Hz), 124.9 (d, J ) 18.8 Hz), 128.8 (d, J ) 18.3 Hz),
150.4 (t, J ) 4.8 Hz; 31P NMR (CDCl3) δ 12.5; PM (MS) 384.
Anal. Calcd for C14H26O6P2S: C, 43.75; H, 6.82. Found: C,
43.55; H, 6.99.
Preparation of 2,5-Dimethyl-3,4-bis(phosphino)thio-
phene (2). Trimethylchlorosilane (11.2 mL) was added to a
suspension of LiAlH4 (3.6 g) in THF (80 mL), at -78 °C, under
N2, and the mixture was stirred at room temperature for 2 h.
The solution was cooled to -60 °C and a solution of 3 (5.6 g)
in dry THF (20 mL) was added. The reaction mixture was
stirred at room temperature for 3 h and then water (3.6 mL),
a 15% NaOH solution (3.6 mL), and water (10.8 mL) were
added in sequence. The mixture was left stirring up to the
formation of a precipitate, which was filtered off and washed
with four 20-mL portions of THF. Removal of the solvent from
the filtrate left a residue which was dissolved in toluene (50
mL) and washed twice with water (2 × 20 mL). The organic
phase was filtered on Decalite and evaporated to dryness to
give 2 as a pale-yellow oil (90% yield). A sample was purified
by distillation under reduced pressure (bp 75 °C at 5 Torr) to
give 2 as a colorless oil: 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 2.96 (6H, s), 3.67
(t, 2H), 4.70 (t, 2H); 13C NMR (CDCl3) δ 15.9 (t, J ) 4.2 Hz),
127.2, 141.6 (t, J ) 10.9 Hz); 31P NMR (CDCl3) δ -154.7 (t, J
) 6 Hz); PM (MS) 176. Anal. Calcd for C6H10P2S: C, 40.91; H,
5.72. Found: C, 40.66; H, 5.88.
-
Preparation of [(COD)Rh(UlluPHOS)]+BF4 (4a). A
mixture of [Rh(COD)2]BF4 (9.7 mg) and 1 (9 mg) in degassed
CH2Cl2 (1.5 mL) was stirred for 2 h. The solvent was
evaporated under vacuum and the orange complex used
without any purification: 31P NMR (CDCl3) 51.1 (d, J ) 146
Hz).
Crystals of the complex suitable for X-ray analysis were
obtained by stirring a solution of 1 (50 mg) and [Rh(COD)2]-
BF4 (59 mg) in degassed CH2Cl2 (5 mL) for 2 h. THF (2.5 mL)
and n-hexane (5 mL) were added and the solvents slowly
evaporated until some crystals precipitated. After 24 h, the
precipitation was complete, and the crystals were washed first
with Et2O and then with THF.
Preparation of [(COD)Rh(UlluPHOS)]+OTf- (4b). A
mixture of [Rh(COD)2]OTf (108.9 mg) and 1 (90 mg) in
degassed CH2Cl2 (10 mL) was stirred for 2 h. The solvent was
evaporated to one-third of its volume, and then THF (6 mL)
and n-hexane (4 mL) were added. The solvent was evaporated
under reduced pressure until crystallization started. The
mixture was kept at -5 °C in a refrigerator and then the
orange solid precipitate was collected, washed with n-hexane
(3 × 4 mL), and dried under vacuum to give the complex (0.1
g): 31P NMR (CDCl3) 49.7 (d, J ) 134 Hz).
Preparation of [(p-Cymene)Ru(UlluPHOS)I]I (4c). A
solution of [(RuI2(p-cymene)2] (0.0014 mmol) and 1 (0.0035
mmol) in degassed CH2Cl2 (25 mL) and MeOH (9 mL) was
refluxed for 2 h. The solvent was evaporated to dryness and
the red complex used without any further purification: 31P
NMR (CDCl3) δ 79. 25 (d, J ) 45.5 Hz), 59.99 (d, J ) 45.5
Hz); PM (ESI positive) 703.1.
X-ray Crystallography: [(COD)Rh(UlluPHOS)]+BF4
-
(4a). X-ray Structure Determination of the [((S,S)-Me-
DuPHOS)Rh(1,5-cycloctadiene)]BF4 Complex. Crystal
data: C26H42P2RhS+ BF4-, 0.2965(C4H8O), 0.2035(CH2Cl2). fw
) 677.04, monoclinic red crystal 0.32 × 0.21 × 0.11 mm3, space
group C2, a ) 14.764(2) Å, b ) 17.671(3) Å, c ) 11.940(2) Å,
â ) 103.858(6)°, V ) 3024.4(8) Å3, Z ) 4, Fcalc ) 1.486 g cm-3
,
µ(Mo KR) ) 0.818 mm-1, 20 633 reflections measured at 90
K, below θ ) 33.05°, 10 291 unique [9047 with I > 2σ(I)], R(ave)
) 0.248, 366 parameters refined on F2 using SHELXL17 code
to final indices R(all) ) 0.0401, wR )0.0836-3, {w ) 1/[σ2(F2)+-
(0.0495P)2], where P ) (Fo + 2Fc2)/3}. The following are the
2
refinement details: the tetrafluoroborate anion is disordered,
but its interpretation and refinement were sufficiently easy
and suitable. Much more difficult was understanding the
nature of the solvent lying on the crystallographic 2-fold axis.
Because the salt was crystallized from CH2Cl2, THF, and Et2O,
(17) Sheldrick, G. M. SHELXL-97. Program for the Refinement of
Crystal Structures; University of Go¨ttingen, Germany.
5440 J. Org. Chem., Vol. 70, No. 14, 2005