Y. Wang et al.
MolecularCatalysis452(2018)167–174
2.2.2. IR, UV and XPRD spectral studies
thoroughly with acetonitrile and dried at room temperature to be used
in the next recycling experiment.
The FT-IR spectrum of 1 using a KBr pellet in the region of
4000–450 cm−1 was shown in Fig. S1. It gives a strong band at
3424 cm−1 which is assigned to the OeH stretching modes, illustrating
the presence of lattice and coordinated water molecules. While a signal
band appearing at 3160 cm−1 originates from υ(NeO). The spectrum
has five characteristic peaks below 1000 cm−1 appearing at ca. 945(m),
891(vs), 777(s), 646(s) and 461(m), respectively. A strong band at
945 cm−1 is assigned to the characteristic absorption of υ(Mo–Od). In
addition, the strong bands at 891 cm−1 and 777 cm−1 can be ascribed
to the vibrations of Ob–Mo–Ob and Mo–Oc, respectively [49]. And the
absorption of SbeO stretching and bending vibrations is identified as
2.4. Crystallography
Suitable single crystal of 1 was prudentially selected and en-
capsulated in a capillary tube due to their quick efflorescence. Intensity
data were collected at 296(2) K on a Bruker Apex-II CCD diffractometer
using graphite-monochromated Mo Kα radiation (λ = 0.71073 Å).
Routine Lorentz and polarization corrections were applied, and a multi-
scan absorption correction was performed using the SADABS program.
The structure was solved by direct methods, developed by successive
difference Fourier syntheses. Using Olex2 [51], the structure was solved
with the ShelXS-1997 structure solution program using Direct Methods
and refined with the ShelXL refinement package using Least Squares
minimisation [52,53]. In the final refinement, all the Sb and Mo atoms
were refined anisotropically, while the C, N and O atoms were refined
isotropically. The lattice water molecules were determined by CHN
element analysis and TGA results. All the hydrogen atoms on the water
molecules were directly included in the molecular formula. The CCDC
number is 1567093 for 1. Selected crystal data and structure refinement
around 646 cm−1
.
The UV spectrum of compound 1 in aqueous solution reveals one
characteristic peak in the range of 200–400 nm (Fig. S2), and the ab-
sorption band at 208 nm can be attributed to the pπ–dπ charge-transfer
transitions of the Ot → Mo bonds [50]. The X-ray powder diffraction
pattern (XPRD) matches well with the simulated one from single-crystal
data in key positions (Fig. S3), indicating the purity of compound 1.
And this intensity discrepancy between the experimental and simulated
XPRD patterns may be caused by the variation in the preferred or-
ientation of the powder sample during the collection of the experi-
mental XPRD.
3. Results and discussion
2.2.3. Mass spectrometric study of the 1
To investigate the cluster species in solution, electrospray-ionization
mass spectrometry (ESI–MS) was conducted. Single crystals of 1 were
dissolved in 20 mL acetonitrile. The ESI–MS result shows that there
3.1. Synthesis
In this paper, compound 1 has been prepared by a one-pot reaction
of (NH4)6Mo7O24·4H2O, Sb2O3, Sb2O5 and (CH3)4NOH·5H2O in aqueous
solution. The simple synthetic process of 1 was shown in Scheme 1.
During our preparations of 1, the parallel experiments indicated that
there are three essential reaction conditions, such as pH value, counter
cations and molar ratios. The rarely isolated compound 1 could be
obtained from an acidified SbV, SbIII, molybdate solution (pH = 3.1,
molar ratio of 1:1.2:8.8) and (CH3)4N+ as counterions at 60 °C. (1) In
our case, the optimal pH is 3.1 and that is a vital factor in the formation
and crystallization of 1. For a lower pH (pH < 2.7), only an abundance
were three peaks located at m/z 848.64, 867.49 and 1185.75 which
4−
belong
to
H3[SbVSbI4IIMo18O66
]
(calcd
848.62),
4−
TMAH2[SbVSb4IIIMo18O66
]
[TMA = (CH3)4N+] (calcd 867.28) and
TMAH3[SbVSbI4IIMo18O66(H2O)5]3− (calcd 1185.76), respectively
(Table S7, Figs. S4–S7). Samples were introduced to the spectrometer
via direct injection at a flow rate of 15 μL min−1 using a syringe pump.
Moreover, the electrospray source was used with the dying nitrogen gas
and the ion polarity for all MS data collections recorded was negative.
And the following parameters were consistent for all ESI–MS data col-
lections as follows: ionspray voltage: −4500 V, curtain gas flow, 25 PSI;
ion source gas 1, 15 PSI; ion source gas 2, 15 PSI; ion energy 1, −1.1 V;
pulser frequency, 11.332 KHz; pulse 1 duration, 3.902 us; declustering
potential, −10 V; collision energy, −5.0 V.
of some amorphous precipitates was formed; for
(pH > 3.6), the crystal quality of 1 was very poor and the yield was
reduced. (2) During the course of preparing 1, no crystals suitable for
a higher pH
Table 1
2.2.4. Thermal analysis
The data collection and refinement parameters of compound 1.
To examine the thermal behavior of 1, the TG was implemented
under a N2 atmosphere. The TG curve of 1 undergoes two steps of
weight loss on heating up to a final temperature of 900 °C, giving a total
loss of 38.71% (Fig. S8). And the first weight loss of 4.23% from 25 to
200 °C is attributed to the release of nine lattice water molecules (calcd:
4.06%). Subsequently, the other weight loss of 34.48% between 200 °C
and 900 °C is approximately attributed to the dehydration of one proton
(in the form of constitutional water molecules) and the removal of six
[(CH3)4N]+ cations, along with the oxidation of Sb3+ and the partial
sublimation of the MoO3.
Complex
1
Empirical formula
C24H82N6O71Mo18Sb5
3926.62
296.15
monoclinic
P21/n
12.6582(14)
24.514(3)
Mr (g mol−1
T/K
)
Cryst. syst.
Space group
a/Å
b/Å
c/Å
31.028(4)
β/°
100.841(2)
9456.3(18)
4
3.801
7388.0
0.4 × 0.25 × 0.08
3.148–50.2
−14 ≤ h ≤ 15
−29 ≤ k ≤ 27
−37 ≤ l ≤ 35
48601
16798
16798/38/618
1.019
V (Å3)
Z
2.3. Oxidation of silanes to silanols
μ/mm‐1
F(000)
Cryst. size (mm3)
The catalytic oxidation of various silanes was carried out in a 50 mL
round-bottom tube equipped with a reflux condenser. A typical proce-
dure for catalytic oxidation was as follows: catalyst 1 (15 mg), silanes
(1 mmol), tert-butyl hydroperoxide (TBHP) (6 mmol) and acetonitrile
(3 mL) were charged to the glass tube containing a magnetic stir bar at
the set temperature. At regular intervals, an aliquot was taken directly
from the reaction solution with a microsyringe and the liquid was
periodically analyzed by gas chromatography (GC) using naphthalene
as the internal standard. After the reaction was completed, catalyst 1
was recovered by using a centrifuge at the end of each cycle, washed
Range for data collection
Limiting indices
No. of reflns collected
No. of independent refins
Data/restraints/parameters
GOF on F2
R1, wR2 [I > 2σ (I)]
R1, wR2 [all data]
R1 = 0.0584, wR2 = 0.1424
R1 = 0.0831, wR2 = 0.1613
169