REACTIONS OF CARBAZOLE WITH DIMETHYL ALKANEDISULFONATES
1643
water, the precipitate formed was filtered off and re-
C 86.79; H 5.91; N 7.06. C H N. Calculated, %: C
1
4
11
crystallized from ethanol. Yield 0.24 g (83%), mp 162–
87.01; H 5.74; N 7.25.
1
1
64°C. Н NMR spectrum (CDCl ), δ, ppm: 2.48 s
3
8
-(Propen-2-yl)-9Н-carbazole (5b) was prepared
(
(
3H, CH SO O), 4.46–4.72 m (4Н, СН ), 7.14–7.32 m
1
3
2
2
similarly. Yield 0.14 g (68%), mp 71–72°С. Н NMR
spectrum (CDCl ), δ, ppm (J, Hz): 4.83 d.t (2H, CH ,
2Н, CH ), 7.36–7.52 m (4Н, CH ), 8.07 d (2Н,
Ar
Ar
3
3
2
CH , J = 7.6 Гц). Found, %: C 62.41; H 5.45; N
3
4
3
Ar
HH
JHH = 4.9, J = 1.5), 4.98 d.d.t (1H, CH =, J
=
HH
2
HH
4
.71. C H NO S. Calculated, %: C 62.26; H 5.23; N 4.84.
2
4
15
15
3
1
7.1, J = 1.5, J = 1.5), 5.11 d.d.t (1H, CH =,
HH HH 2
3
2
4
2-(9Н-Carbazol-9-yl)propylmethanesulfonate (3b)
JHH = 10.4, JHH = JHH = 1.5), 5.93 d.d.d (1H, CH=,
3
3
3
was prepared similarly. Yield 0.24 g (79%), mp 107–
JHH = 17.1, J = 10.4, J = 4.9), 7.10–7.27 m (2Н,
HH
HH
1
1
2
3
5
09°С. Н NMR spectrum (CDCl ), δ, ppm (J, Hz):
CH ), 7.28–7.52 m (4Н, CH ), 8.08 d (2Н, CH ,
3
Ar Ar Ar
3
3
.19 q (2Н, СН , J = 5.8), 2.67 s (3H, CH SO O),
.27 t (2H, СН , J = 5.8), 3.46 t (2H, СН , J
.8), 7.44–7.64 m (4Н, CH ), 7.71–7.87 m (4Н,
JHH = 7.6). Found, %: C 86.74; H 6.48; N 6.53.
2
HH
3
2
3
3
=
C H N. Calculated, %: C 86.92; H 6.32; N 6.76.
15 13
2
HH
2
HH
Ar
N-[2-(9Н-Carbazol-9-yl)ethyl]-3,5-dimethylada-
mantyl-1-amine (7). A solution of 0.01 mmol of ethyl
methanesulfonate 3a and 0.02 mmol of 3,5-dimethyl-
adamantane-1-amine 6 in 10 mL of isopropanol was
CH ). Found, %: C 63.17; H 5.86; N 4.43. C H NO S.
Ar
16 17
3
Calculated, %: C 63.34; H 5.65; N 4.62.
1
,2-Di-(9Н-carbazol-9-yl)ethane (4a). To a solu-
tion of 1 mmol of carbazole 1 in 20 mL of THF was
added 1.1 mmol of NaH. The reaction mixture was
stirred for 1 h, then 0.05 mmol of dimethyl sulfonate
refluxed for 8 h, then poured into 100 mL of H O. The
2
precipitate formed was filtered off and recrystallized
1
from ethanol. Yield 0.31 g (83%), mp 178–180°С. Н
2a was added and stirring was continued for 2 h at 20°С.
NMR spectrum (CDCl ), δ, ppm (J, Hz): 0.77 s (6Н,
3
After the reaction completed the mixture was poured
СН ), 0.96–1.09 m (2Н, СН ), 1.09–1.26 m (9Н, СН +
3
2
2
into 100 mL of H O. The precipitate formed was
NH), 1.30–1.42 m (2Н, СН ), 1.99–2.12 m (1Н, СН),
2
2
3
3
filtered off and recrystallized from ethanol. Yield 0.27 g
3.01 t (2H, СН , J = 7.0), 4.36 t (2H, СН , J
=
2
HH
2
HH
1
(
75%), mp 300°С. Н NMR spectrum (CDCl ), δ, ppm
7.0), 7.16–7.31 m (2Н, CH ), 7.40–7.53 m (4Н, CH ),
3
Ar Ar
3
(
7
J, Hz): 4.92 s (4Н, СН ), 7.01–7.14 m (4Н, CH ),
8.08 d (2Н, CH , J = 7.6). Found, %: C 83.61; H
Ar HH
2
Ar
3
.18–7.27 m (8Н, CH ), 8.01 d (4Н, CH , J
=
8.84; N 7.33. C H N . Calculated, %: C 83.82; H 8.66;
Ar
Ar
HH
26 32 2
7
.8). Found, %: C 86.86; H 5.75; N 7.98. C H N .
N 7.52.
26
20
2
Calculated, %: C 86.65; H 5.59; N 7.77.
1
H NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker DPX
1
,2-Di-(9Н-carbazol-9-yl)propane (4b) was pre-
200 spectrometer, reference SiMe . Melting points
4
pared similarly. Yield 0.27 g (72%), mp 181–183°С.
were determined in a glass capillary.
1
Н NMR spectrum (CDCl ), δ, ppm (J, Hz): 2.43 q
3
3
3
(
2Н, СН , J = 7.3), 4.32 t (4H, СН , J = 7.3),
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
2 HH 2 HH
3
7
8
6
5
.10–7.30 m (8Н, CH ) 7.39 t (4Н, CH , J = 7.6),
Ar Ar HH
.10 d (4H, CH , J = 7.6). Found, %: C 86.38; H
.11; N 7.31. C H N . Calculated, %: C 86.60; H
3
This work was supported by the Russian Science
Foundation (project no. 14-23-00160).
Ar
HH
2
7
22
2
.92; N 7.48.
REFERENCES
8
-Vinyl-9Н-carbazole (5a). To a solution of
1
2
1
mmol of carbazole 1 in 20 mL of THF was added
.1 mmol of NaH. The reaction mixture was stirred for
h, then 0.1 mmol of dimethyl sulfonate 2a was added
1
2
3
. Yaqub, G., Hannan, A., Akbar, E., Usman, M., Hamid, A.,
Sadiq, Z., and Iqbal, M., J. Chem., 2013, ID 818739. doi
10.1155/2013/ 818739
and the mixture was stirred for 8 h at 60°С. After the
reaction completed the mixture was poured into
1
. Thevissen, K., Marchand, A., Chaltin, P., Meert, E.M.K.,
and Cammue, B.P.A., Curr. Med. Chem., 2009, vol. 16,
no. 17, p. 2205. doi 10.2174/092986709788612701
00 mL of H O. The formed precipitate was filtered
2
off and recrystallized from ethanol. Yield 0.14 g
. Giraud, F., Bourhis, M., Nauton, L., Théry, V.,
Herfindal, L., Døskeland, S.O., Anizon, F., and Moreau, P.,
Bioorg. Chem., 2014, vol. 57, p. 108. doi 10.1016/
j.bioorg.2014.09.004
1
(
73%), mp 101–103°С. Н NMR spectrum (CDCl ), δ,
3
3
ppm (J, Hz): 5.16 d (1Н, СН =, J = 9.0), 5.55 d
2
HH
3
(
1Н, СН =, J = 16.2), 7.18–7.38 m (3Н, CH
+
Ar
2
HH
Ar
3
СН=), 7.48 t (2Н, CH , J = 7.6), 7.67 d (2Н, CH ,
4. Guillonneau, C., Pierre, A., Charton, Y., Guilbard, N.,
Berthier, L.K., Leonce, S., Michael, A., Bisagni, E., and
Ar
HH
3
3
JHH = 8.2), 8.08 d (2Н, CH , J = 7.6). Found, %:
Ar
HH
RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF GENERAL CHEMISTRY Vol. 87 No. 7 2017