Evaluation Only. Created with Aspose.PDF. Copyright 2002-2021 Aspose Pty Ltd.
68% yield (Scheme 2). The assigned structure was confirmed
by X-ray crystallography.3
and the present method could provide an alternative route
to these useful materials.
Scanning a variety of Lewis acids for the above transfor-
mation, it was found that the first choice of TMSOTf was
best, although BF3‚Et2O and TFA also gave the same
product. Other Lewis acids such as TiCl4, triflic acid,
MeAlCl2, and Yb(OTf)3 resulted in less than 10% conversion.
Using TMSOTf, we then examined the reaction of cyclo-
hexenone with a variety of alkyl azides (Table 1). The alkyl
Scheme 2
Table 1. Reaction of Cyclohexenone with Various Azides
entry
R
yield (%) product (Z/E ratio)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
PhCH2CH2-
93
83
76
69
62
77
20
2 (2:1)
3 (2:1)
4 (3:2)
5 (1:1)
6 (1:1)
7 (2:1)
8 (2:1)
Reactions of azides and enones are known to produce ring-
contracted products or ring-expanded lactams thermally via
triazoline intermediates.4 There have also been reports on
ring-contraction of enamines and enol ethers using arylsul-
fonyl azides.5 In general, such reactions usually require
heating to ca. 100 °C for 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition. In the
present case, temperatures of 0 °C to rt are sufficient to
activate the carbonyl group toward cycloaddition. Enami-
nones are versatile building blocks for the construction of
various heterocycles6 and natural products7 and are often
endowed with useful pharmacological properties.8 Enami-
nones are generally prepared from 1,3-diketones and amines,6a,9
n-C6H13
-
trans-PhCHdCHCH2-
EtO2CCH2CH2-
p-MeO(C6H4)CH2-
Cl(CH2)3-
c-C6H11
-
azides examined gave smooth ring contraction to furnish
enaminones 2-7 in ca. 60-90% yields with the exception
of azidocyclohexane (entry 7).
1
The Z,E ratio of each product was determined using H
NMR of the crude material. In general, the isomers were
not separable, and enaminones with Z double-bond geometry
were favored over the E isomers. The geometry was assigned
based on spectroscopic (IR and 1H NMR) trends throughout
the series (Figure 1). To wit, the isomer that had the lower
(3) Coincidently, a single crystal of the minor isomer (E)-1 was picked
from the mixture of E,Z isomers for X-ray analysis.
(4) (a) Schultz, A. G.; McMahon, W. G. J. Org. Chem. 1984, 49, 1676-
1678. (b) Schultz, A. G.; Ravichandran, R. J. Org. Chem. 1980, 45, 5008-
5009. (c) Sha, C.-K.; Ouyang, S.-L.; Hsieh, D.-Y.; Hseu, T.-H. J. Chem.
Soc., Chem. Commun. 1984, 492-494. (d) Sha, C.-K.; Ouyang, S.-L.; Hsieh,
D.-Y.; Chang, R.-C.; Chang, S.-C. J. Org. Chem. 1986, 51, 1490-1494.
(e) Benati, L.; Calestani, G.; Montevecchi, P. C.; Spagnolo, P. J. Chem.
Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1995, 1381-1385. (g) Hansen, P. E.; Undheim, K. J.
Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1975, 305-308. (h) Benati, L.; Montevecchi,
P. C.; Spagnolo, P. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1991, 71-77. (i) Benati,
L.; Montevecchi, P. C.; Spagnolo, P.; Foresti, E. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans. 1 1992, 2845-2850. (j) Molander, G. A.; Bibeau, C. T. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2002, 43, 5385-5388.
(5) (a) Wohl, R. A. HelV. Chim. Acta 1973, 56, 1826-1828. (b) Wohl,
R. A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1973, 3111-3114. (c) Semenov, V. P.; Andreeva,
T. D.; Ogloblin, K. A. Zh. Org. Khim. 1988, 24, 217-220. (d) Semenov,
V. P.; Mishin, M. A.; Ogloblin, K. A. Zh. Org. Khim. 1988, 24, 2384-
2388. (e) Semenov, V. P.; Ogloblin, K. A. Zh. Org. Khim. 1987, 23, 898-
899. (f) Semenov, V. P.; Ogloblin, K. A. Zh. Org. Khim. 1988, 24, 2389-
2397. (g) Xu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Zhu, S. Synthesis 2000, 513-516.
(6) (a) Greenhill, J. V. Chem. Soc. ReV. 1977, 6, 277-294. (b) Lue, P.;
Greenhill, J. V. AdV. Heterocycl. Chem. 1997, 67, 207-343. (c) Cimarelli,
C.; Palmieri, G. Recent Res. DeVel. Org. Chem. 1997, 1, 179-189.
(7) Michael, J. P.; De Koning, C. B.; Gravestock, D.; Hosken, G. D.;
Howard, A. S.; Jungmann, C. M.; Krause, R. W. M.; Parsons, A. S.; Pelly,
S. C.; Stanbury, T. V. Pure Appl. Chem. 1999, 71, 979-988.
(8) (a) Scott, K. R.; Rankin, G. O.; Stables, J. P.; Alexander, M. S.;
Edafiogho, I. O.; Farrar, V. A.; Kolen, K. R.; Moore, J. A.; Sims, L. D.;
Tonnu, A. D. J. Med. Chem. 1995, 38, 4033-4043. (b) Edafiogho, I. O.;
Alexander, M. S.; Moore, J. A.; Farrar, V. A.; Scott, K. R. Curr. Med.
Chem. 1994, 1, 159-175. (c) Edafiogho, I. O.; Moore, J. A.; Alexander,
M. S.; Scott, K. R. J. Pharm. Sci. 1994, 83, 1155-1170.
Figure 1. Characteristic spectral data of (Z)- and (E)-1.
field NH proton and a higher field olefinic proton was
assigned as the Z isomer.10 In addition, the Z isomer has a
lower νCdO compared to that measured for the E isomer.
Intramolecular hydrogen bonding in the Z isomer could be
responsible for the dramatic difference in the spectral data
of the Z and E isomers.11
(9) (a) Azzaro, M.; Geribaldi, S.; Videau, B. Synthesis 1981, 880-881.
(b) Baraldi, P. G.; Simoni, D.; Manfredini, S. Synthesis 1983, 902-903.
(c) Valduga, C. J.; Squizani, A.; Braibante, H. S.; Braibante, M. E. F.
Synthesis 1998, 1019-1022. (d) Stefane, B.; Polanc, S. New J. Chem. 2002,
26, 28-32.
(10) (a) Zhuo, J.-C. Magn. Reson. Chem. 1997, 35, 311-322. (b). Zhuo,
J. C.; Schenk, K. HelV. Chim. Acta 1997, 80, 2137-2147.
3900
Org. Lett., Vol. 5, No. 21, 2003