V.V. Patil, G.S. Shankarling / Catalysis Communications 57 (2014) 138–142
139
[27], in Prins reaction [28], alkylation [29], halogenation [30],
acetalization [31] deprotection [32] in the manufacture of fused
homocyclic compounds [33] and in Biginelli reaction [34].
In the present context, we are exploring the heterogeneous catalytic
reaction by utilizing commercially available Amberlyst-15 catalyst
to synthesize various dihydro perimidine derivatives by reacting
naphthalene-1,8-diamine with various ketones. This protocol offers a
simple, environmentally benign route for the synthesis of 2,3-dihydro-
1H-perimidines.
7.29–7.19 (m, 5H, Ar–H), 7.12–7.09 (d, 2H, Ar–H, J = 8.4), 6.51–6.49
(d, 2H, Ar–H, J = 7.6), 4.69 (broad singlet, 2H, N–H), 1.79 (s, 3H,
–CH3); MS (EI) 261.1 (M + H), 244.1.
3. Result and discussion
3.1. Reaction condition optimization
The reaction parameters were optimized using naphthalene-1,8-
diamine 1a and acetophenone 2a as model substrates with 20% (w/w)
Amberlyst-15 catalyst. Under solvent free condition, 36% yield of 3a was
obtained after 10 h (Table 1, entry 1). Higher yield was obtained when
ethanol was employed as a solvent (Table 1, entry 7). The yield of 3a
was increased exponentially with rise in temperature. At room temper-
ature no product formation was observed (Table 1, entry 8) while the
highest yield was obtained at 80 °C (Table 1, entry 7). The catalyst load-
ing was optimized to 20% (w/w) as further rise in catalyst quantity did
not show any influence on yield and reaction time (Table 1, entries 7,
14–16). Under catalyst free conditions only starting material was ob-
served on TLC (Table 1, entry 17). When we replaced Amberlyst-15
with other acidic catalyst such as Amberlite IR-120, sulfated zirconia, re-
action did not occur (Table 1, entries 18–19) while with Indion-130,
poor yield of 3a was obtained in 10 h (Table 1, entry 20).
2. Experimental
2.1. Materials and equipments
All the reagents and reactants were purchased from commercial
suppliers and were used without further purification. Melting points
were uncorrected and recorded on standard melting point apparatus
from Sunder Industrial Products, Mumbai. 1H NMR spectra were record-
ed on 400 MHz Bruker spectrometer using CDCl3 as a solvent and chem-
ical shifts have been expressed in δ ppm using TMS as an internal
standard. Infrared spectra were recorded on Jasco-FT/IR 4100 LE
ATR PRO450-S spectrometer. Mass spectral data was obtained with
micromass-Q-Tof (YA105) spectrometer.
2.2. General procedure for the synthesis of 2,3-dihydro-1H-perimidine
3.2. Reaction of naphthalene-1,8-diamine with various ketones
A mixture of naphthalene-1,8-diamine (1a) (0.5 g, 3.16 mmol),
ketone/ β-keto derivative (2) (3.16 mmol) and Amberlyst-15
(20%, w/w) was stirred in ethanol (5 ml) at 80 °C. The progress of reac-
tion was monitored using thin layer chromatography. The catalyst was
filtered off and washed with ethanol (3 × 5 ml). Filtrate and all washings
were collected and evaporated under vacuum using rotary evaporator to
get crude solid mass. The crude product was purified by column chroma-
tography using toluene as an eluting system. The compounds were
characterized using spectroscopic techniques (FT-IR, MS, 1H-NMR).
The optimized reaction conditions were then tested with various
ketonic compounds (Scheme 1) and the results obtained were sum-
marized in Table 2. It was found that, the alkyl–aryl ketones with an
electron withdrawing group on the aryl ring kinetically favored the
reaction as the reaction was completed within a shorter period com-
pared to the corresponding electron donating group. For instance, reac-
tion with 4-nitro acetophenone (2b) was observed to be terminated in
45 min to give 90% yield of 3b (Table 2, entry 2), while reaction with 4-
methoxy acetophenone (2d) required 2.15 h to give 95% of 3d (Table 2,
entry 4). Compared to aryl–alkyl ketones, dialkyl ketones (Table 2, en-
tries 9–13) showed high reactivity with even shorter reaction time of
less than 30 min. The reason for high reactivity of dialkyl ketones over
aryl–alkyl ketones could be due to the steric hindrance exerted by phenyl
ring. It is also noticeable that, under present reaction conditions, 87% yield
of compound 3m was obtained which was significantly higher than the
earlier reported yield (25%) by Yavari et al. [35] in 60 h.
2.2.1. Spectral data of a representative compound
2.2.1.1. 2-Methyl-2-phenyl-2,3-dihydro-1H-perimidine (entry 3a, Table 2).
Off white solid. 0.485 g, 97%, m.p. 138 °C (from toluene); IR(KBr):
υ
max/cm−1 3369, 3283, 1592, 1404, 812, 754, 700 cm−1 1H NMR
;
(400 MHz; CDCl3; Me4Si) δppm 7.56–7.54 (d, 2H, Ar–H, J = 7.6),
Table 1
Optimization of reaction parameters.a
Entry
Solvent
Catalyst
Cat. concn (%, w/w)
Temp (°C)
Time (h)
Isolated yield (%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Neat
Water
Amberlyst-15
Amberlyst-15
Amberlyst-15
Amberlyst-15
Amberlyst-15
Amberlyst-15
Amberlyst-15
Amberlyst-15
Amberlyst-15
Amberlyst-15
Amberlyst-15
Amberlyst-15
Amberlyst-15
Amberlyst-15
Amberlyst-15
Amberlyst-15
No catalyst
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
15
17
23
25
30
–
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
rt
50
60
70
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
10
10
10
10
10
10
2.15
15
10
10
3
10
10
2.15
2.15
2.00
10
10
10
36
No reaction
No reaction
No reaction
Traces
52
97
No reaction
62
68
78
75
84
96
97
Acetonitrile
DESb
DMF
1,3-Dioxane
Ethanol
Ethanol
Ethanol
Ethanol
Ethanol
Ethanol
Ethanol
Ethanol
Ethanol
Ethanol
Ethanol
Ethanol
Ethanol
Ethanol
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
97
No reaction
No reaction
No reaction
18
Amberlite 120
Sulfated zirconia
Indion-130
20
20
20
10
rt: room temperature (30–32 °C).
a
Reaction conditions: naphthalene-1,8-diamine (0.2 g, 1.26 mmol), acetophenone (1.26 mmol), Amberlyst-15 (20%, w/w), ethanol (3 ml).
DES–choline chloride–urea.
b