Table 1. Aziridination of Styrene with Various Sulfonamides
Table 2. Aziridination of Styrene with Various Metal Catalysts
entry
R
X
Y
yielda (%)
entry
catalyst
Cu(OTf)2
Cu(OTf)‚PhH
CuBr‚(CH3)2S
Cu(CH3CN)4PF6
CuCl2
CuBr
CuI
Cu(acac)2
Cu(tfac)2
yielda (%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
H
N
N
N
CH
CH
CH
N
SO2
SO2
SO2
SO2
SO2
CO
76
84
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
71
66
8
58
10
6
trace
78
84
5-Me
6-Me
4-Me
H
73b
NRc
15
NRc
NRc
H
H
CO
a NMR yield. b 3.0 equiv of styrene was used. c NR ) no reaction.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Cu((hfac)2‚H2O
Cu(OAc)
Cu(OAc)2
48
10
5
63b
NRc
NRc
NRc
NRc
NRc
selective aziridine ring-opening were achieved on the basis
of a chelation strategy.7
[Rh(OAc)2]2
RuCl2(CO)2(PPh3)2
d
At the outset of our studies, we intended to develop a
practical aziridination system by using readily available
sulfonamides or amides as a nitrogen source in combination
with an easily handled oxidant such as PhI(OAc)2 for the
generation of nitrene precursor that is catalytically transferred
to alkenes (Table 1). In initial experiments with styrene, it
was found that certain copper complexes effectively cata-
lyzed the aziridination when 2-pyridinesulfonamides (X )
N, Y ) SO2) were employed in combination with PhI(OAc)2
alone in the absence of any external ligands or bases (entry
1). Introduction of a methyl group at the C5 position slightly
improved reaction efficiency to afford the corresponding
aziridine in the highest yield (entry 2). Interestingly, use of
6-methyl-2-pyridinesulfonamide gave less satisfactory results
even under more forcing conditions (3.0 equiv of styrene,
entry 3). On the other hand, aziridination reaction of styrene
with p-toluenesulfonamide (R ) 4-Me, X ) CH, Y ) SO2)
or benzenesulfonamide (R ) H, X ) CH, Y ) SO2) turned
out to be sluggish under the employed conditions (entry 4
and 5, respectively), thus strongly implying that a driVing
force for the reaction is the coordination of Cu to the pyridyl
N atom of 2-pyridinesulfonamides. During preparation of this
manuscript, Che et al. reported that addition of external
ligands is highly important for giving high efficiency and
enantioselectivity in Cu(CH3CN)4ClO4-catalyzed aziridina-
tion of olefins using sulfonamides and PhI(OAc)2 systems.8
In the meantime, carboxamides turned out to be poor nitrene
donors under the present catalyst systems (entries 6 and 7).
Efficiency of catalysts was next investigated in the
aziridination of styrene with the use of 5-methyl-2-pyridine-
sulfonamide (1) and PhI(OAc)2 system (Table 2, R: 5-meth-
d
Ru(acac)3
CpRu(PPh3)2Cld
d
RuCl3
RuCl2(C10H8N2)2‚2H2Od
a NMR yield. b 10 equiv of styrene was used. c NR ) no reaction. d 10
mol % of catalyst was employed.
yl-2-pyridinesulfonyl). It was immediately found that certain
Cu complexes showed higher catalytic activities compared
to other transition-metal species which exhibited either lower
or almost no reactivities. Among Cu catalysts tested, copper-
(II) trifluoroacetylacetonate yielded the best results (entry
9).
Table 3 shows results of the coordination-assisted aziri-
dination of a range of olefins with sulfonamide 1 under the
optimized conditions (R: 5-methyl-2-pyridinesulfonyl). Aro-
matic olefins were smoothly reacted irrespective of their
electronic and steric properties to afford the corresponding
aziridines in good yields (entries 1-8). Interestingly, a ring-
opened compound was isolated from the reaction with O-silyl
styrene (entry 9), which was presumably derived by a
subsequent reaction of aziridine with acetate released from
the oxidant, PhI(OAc)2. While a reaction of trans-â-
methylstyrene afforded only E-aziridine, that of cis-olefin
took place nonstereoselectively so that a mixture of cis/trans-
isomeric products were generated (entries 11 and 12). This
strongly suggests that the nitrene-transfer process in our
system proceeds stepwise via a radical pathway.9
Aliphatic olefins were rather less reactive so the corre-
sponding aziridines were obtained in moderate yields under
more forcing conditions (entries 13 and 14). In the case of
norbornene, only exo-aziridine was produced, confirmed by
a single-crystal X-ray diffraction study (Figure 1).10 Intrigu-
(6) (a) So¨dergren, M. J.; Alonso, D. A.; Bedekar, A. V.; Andersson, P.
G. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 6897. (b) Dauban, P.; Dodd, R. H. J. Org.
Chem. 1999, 64, 5304.
(7) Recent reports from this laboratory regarding on the chelation
approach: (a) Ko, S.; Na, Y.; Chang, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 750.
(b) Ko, S.; Lee, C.; Choi, M.-G.; Na, Y.; Chang, S. J. Org. Chem. 2003,
68, 1607. (c) Ko, S.; Han, H.; Chang, S. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 2687. (d) Na,
Y.; Ko, S.; Hwang, L. K. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 4475.
(8) Kwong, H.-L.; Liu, D.; Chan, K.-Y.; Lee, C.-S.; Huang, K.-H.; Che,
C.-M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 3965.
(9) For mechanistic studies in Cu-catalyzed aziridination, see: (a) Evans,
D. A.; Faul, M. M.; Bilodeau, M. T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 2742.
(b) Li, Z.; Quan, R. W.; Jacobsen, E. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117,
5889. (b) Brandt, P.; So¨dergren, M. J.; Andersson, P. G.; Norrby, P.-O. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 8013.
4110
Org. Lett., Vol. 6, No. 22, 2004