B. P. Bandgar, K. A. Shaikh / Tetrahedron Letters 44 (2003) 1959–1961
1961
substitution took place at C-2 giving the corresponding
bis(indolyl)methanes (entry 5) in good to excellent
C H N : C, 85.68; H, 5.99; N, 8.33. Found: C, 85.75;
24 20 2
H, 5.88; N, 8.28%.
yields. In comparison to the reported catalysts, I in
2
acetonitrile was found to be an excellent catalyst in
terms of yields and reaction times. This is because of
the mild Lewis acidity of iodine, which activates the
carbonyl group as well as the indole moiety to promote
the reaction (Scheme 2).
References
1. Sundberg, R. J. The Chemistry of Indoles; Academic
Press: New York, 1970.
2
. (a) Porter, J. K.; Bacon, C. W.; Robins, J. D.; Himmels-
bach, D. S.; Higman, H. C. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1977,
25, 88; (b) Osawa, T.; Namiki, M. Tetrahedron Lett.
1983, 24, 4719; (c) Fahy, E.; Potts, B. C. M.; Faulkner,
D. J.; Smith, K. J. Nat. Prod. 1991, 54, 564; (d) Bifulco,
G.; Bruno, I.; Riccio, R.; Lavayre, J.; Bourdy, G. J. Nat.
Prod. 1995, 58, 1254; (e) Bell, R.; Carmell, S.; Sar, N. J.
Nat. Prod. 1994, 57, 1587; (f) Garbe, T. R.; Kobayashi,
M.; Shimizu, N.; Takesue, N.; Ozawa, M.; Yukawa, H. J.
Nat. Prod. 2000, 63, 596.
In conclusion, I in acetonitrile was found to be mild
2
and effective catalyst for the electophilic substitution
reactions of indoles with aldehydes and ketones giving
bis(indolyl)methanes in excellent yields. The use of this
inexpensive and easily available catalyst under essen-
tially neutral reaction and work-up conditions, the
cleaner reaction and greater selectivity make this proto-
col practical and economically attractive. The proce-
dure was found to be general as a variety of aldehydes
and ketones react with indoles under mild reaction
conditions in a very short time (<1 min)
3. (a) Ehrlich, P. Med. Woche 1901, 151; (b) Morgan, L.;
Schunior, R. J. Org. Chem. 1962, 27, 3696; (c) Dolphin,
D. J. Heterocyclic Chem. 1979, 7, 275.
4
5
. Remers, W. Chem. Heterocyclic Compd. 1972, 25, 1.
. (a) Roomi, M.; MacDonald, S. Can. J. Chem. 1970, 48,
139; (b) Gregorovich, B.; Liang, K.; Clugston, D.; Mac-
Donald, S. Can. J. Chem. 1968, 46, 3291.
Typical procedure: A mixuture of 4-methylbenzaldehyde
(
1 mmol), indole (2 mmol) and I (0.2 mmol) in acetoni-
2
trile (10 ml) was stirred at room temperature for a few
seconds. After completion of the reaction (TLC, <1
min), the mixture treated with aq. Na S O solution
6. (a) Woland, W.; Venkiteswaren, M.; Richards, C. J. Org.
Chem. 1961, 26, 4241; (b) Banerji, J.; Chatterjee, A.;
Manna, S.; Pascard, C.; Prange, T.; Shoolery, J. Hetero-
cycles 1981, 15, 325.
2
2
3
(
5%, 10 ml) and the product was extracted with ethyl
acetate (3×5 ml). The combined organic layer was dried
with anhydrous sodium sulphate, concentrated in vacuo
and purified by column chromatography (ethyl ace-
tate:petroleum ether=1:9) to afford the pure product.
7. (a) Chatterjee, A.; Manna, S.; Banerji, J.; Pascard, C.;
Prange, T.; Shoolery, J. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1
1980, 553; (b) Babu, G.; Sridhar, N.; Perumal, P. T.
Synth. Commun. 2000, 30, 1609.
8
. Maiti, A. K.; Bhattacharyya, P. J. Chem. Res. (S) 1997,
24.
. Chen, D.; Yu, L.; Wang, P. G. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996,
7, 4467.
0. Kobayashi, S.; Araki, M.; Yasuda, M. Tetrahedron Lett.
995, 36, 5773.
3
9
1
,3%-Bis(indolyl)-4-methylphenylmethane: solid; mp 96–
4
7°C; yield 99%; IR (KBr): w 765, 1050, 1210, 1520,
9
−
1
1
600, 2950, 3040, 3110, 3450 cm ; H NMR (300
3
MHz, CDCl ): l 2.38 (s, 3H, Ar-CH ), 5.85 (s, 1H,
Ar-CH), 6.70 (d, 2H, J=2.5 Hz), 7.02 (t, 2H, J=8.1
Hz), 7.1 (d, 2H, J=8.1 Hz), 7.2–7.3 (m, 6H), 7.4 (d,
3
3
1
1
1
1
1. Yadav, J. S.; Subba Reddy, B. V.; Murthy, C. V. S. R.;
Kumar, G. M.; Madan, C. Synthesis 2001, 5, 783.
2
1
H, J=8.1 Hz), 7.85 (br, s, 2H, NH); MS (70 eV,
30°C) m/z (%): 336 (M , 100). Anal. calcd for
+
2. (a) Banik, B. K.; Mukhopadhyay, C.; Venkatraman, M.
S.; Becker, F. F. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 7743; (b)
Banik, B. K.; Zegrocka, O.; Banik, I.; Hackfeld, L.;
Becker, F. F. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 673; (c) Banik,
B. K.; Zegrocka, O.; Becker, F. F. J. Chem. Res. (S)
2000, 7, 321; (d) Mukhopadhyay, C.; Becker, F. F.;
Banik, B. K. J. Chem. Res. (S) 2001, 28; (e) Basu, M. K.;
Samajdar, S.; Becker, F. F.; Banik, B. K. Synlett 2002, 2,
319; (f) Firouzabadi, H.; Iranpoor, N.; Hazarkhani, H. J.
Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 7527.
1
3. (a) Banerjee, J.; Chatterjee, A.; Manna, S.; Pascard, C.;
Prange, T.; Shoolery, J. Heterocycles 1981, 15, 325; (b)
Roder, E. Arch. Pharm. 1972, 305, 96; (c) Roder, E. Arch.
Pharm. 1972, 305, 117; (d) Noland, W.; Venkiteswaren,
M.; Richards, C. J. Org. Chem. 1961, 37, 2169.
Scheme 2.