132
H. Fukui et al. / Journal of Fluorine Chemistry 103 (2000) 129±134
naphthene mineral oil. Naphthene mineral oil is widely used
as base oil for refrigeration lubricants in refrigerating
machines using conventional chloro¯uorocarbon (CFC)
refrigerant. Though the lubricity of naphthene mineral oil
alone is not suf®cient, it improves substantially when metal
chlorides form on metal surfaces with chlorine atoms from
CFC refrigerants [2,3]. To compensate for this effect in the
Falex wear test, 1,1-dichloro-1,1-di¯uoromethane (CFC-
12) was blown into the sample oil during testing.
In order to measure the performance of BisA-TFE with-
out the metal chloride effect, its Falex wear test was
conducted without CFC refrigerants. However, in order to
attain test results comparable with those of naphthene
mineral oil, 1,1,1,2-tetra¯uoroethane (HFC-134a) was
blown into the BisA-TFE during testing to reproduce any
reduction in viscosity which may result from dissolution of
refrigerant gas in the sample oil, as well as any detrimental
effect on lubricity which may result from the presence of
refrigerant bubbles on the metal wear surfaces.
Falex test results are also shown in Table 1. The fail load
for naphthene mineral oil was 180 kgf, but no fail load for
BisA-TFE was observed up to the test limit 680 kgf. The
wear for BisA-TFE was 14.2 mg, while that for naphthene
mineral oil was 40 mg. Considering that the lubricity of the
naphthene mineral oil was improved by the effect of metal
chloride formation, the lubricity of BisA-TFE was clearly
superior.
3.2. Relationship between lubricity and the molecular
structure
Table 2 shows Falex test results for various ¯uorinated
alkyl aryl ethers. Tests were conducted with HFC-134a
blown in sample oils. Fail load and wear results varied
somewhat, but lubricity of all ¯uorinated alkyl aryl ethers
were clearly superior to that of naphthene mineral oil.
The fail load for PTOP-TFE was the lowest among the
¯uorinated alkyl aryl ethers, at 360 kgf. It has been shown
that dihydric alcohols have better lubricating properties than
monohydric alcohols, because of the stronger coordination
to metal surfaces which results from the greater number of
coordination sites [2,5]. The authors believe that similarly,
BisA-TFE, with two ether groups, coordinates more
strongly to metal surfaces than PTOP-TFE, which has only
one ether group. With only one coordination site per mole-
cule, PTOP-TFE forms a weaker ®lm than BisA-TFE which
has two sites per molecule. The relative weakness of the ®lm
then explains the lower fail load result.
Bis-MIBK-TFE and BisP-OT-TFE are compounds with
an iso-butyl group and an n-hexyl group, respectively,
substituted on the central carbon of BisA-TFE. As with
BisA-TFE, the fail loads of both exceeded the 680 kgf limit
of the test apparatus, indicating that alkyl group substitution
on the central carbon had no observable effect on extreme-
pressure properties.
It is believed that the excellent lubricity of BisA-TFE can
be explained by examining its molecular structure, as illu-
strated in Fig. 1. The low coef®cient of friction is attributed
to weak intermolecular forces between the ¯uorine atoms of
the Rf groups. The outstanding extreme-pressure properties
are attributed to the strong coordination of the ether oxygen
atoms to fresh metal surfaces. It has been reported that under
boundary lubrication conditions, metal oxides and adsorbed
impurities are removed from asperity contacts on the wear
surfaces [4]. The fresh metal surfaces thus exposed are
believed to enable strong ether oxygen coordination, result-
ing in very high strength lubricant ®lm. These character-
istics of the BisA-TFE molecule are expected to be common
to all derivative species, barring the effects of substituent
groups.
BisP-IOTD-TFE, on the other hand, gave a fail load result
of 460 kgf. As reported previously [1], BisP-IOTD-TFE has
relatively poor thermal and oxidative stability. Decomposi-
tion by heat generated from friction is believed to explain
the low extreme-pressure property of BisP-IOTD-TFE.
BisC-TFE and BisOSBP-A-TFE are compounds with
methyl groups and sec-butyl groups, respectively, substituted
at ortho-positions with the ether linkagegroups of BisA-TFE.
Their fail loads were signi®cantly lower than that of BisA-
TFE, at 480 and 440 kgf, respectively. It is believed that these
compounds have inferior extreme-pressure performance
because ortho-position substituents prevent the coordination
of ether oxygen atoms to the metal surface, in contrast to
substituents on the central carbon which do not prevent such
coordination, as illustrated in Fig. 2.
Fig. 1. Suggested mechanism of lubricity of BisA-TFE.
Fig. 2. Effects of substituent group position on extreme pressure lubricity.