DHEKALE ET AL.
5
isomer (Chiral purity mentioned in Table 1) because the
elution order of isomers are most crucial for chiral
method development. A typical system suitability chro-
matogram of ALV chiral separation is shown in Figure 5.
The system suitability of the method was monitored by
using mobile phase as n‐hexane, isopropyl alcohol, etha-
nol, and diethylamine in the ratio of 650:250:100:5 (v/v)
TABLE 2 Summarized data of system suitability
Peak
Name of Isomer
Resolution
Tailing Factor
Peak‐1
Peak‐2
Peak‐3
Peak‐4
2S,3S,4S
2R,3R,4R
2S,3R,4R
2R,3S,4S
NA
1.23
1.03
1.33
1.25
2.97
1.42
2.56
−
1
with flow rate of 1.0 mL min and column oven tempera-
ture 30°C on CHIRALPK IC column (250 × 4.6 mm, 5 μm).
2S,3S,4S, 2R,3R,4R, 2R,3S,4S isomer in the precision study
at 50% level obtained was 0.97%, 1.29%, and 0.65%
whereas at 100% level obtained was 1.23%, 0.96%, and
4.6 | Method validation
0
.71%, respectively, which confirms the good precision
Blank solution (20:80 methanol: isopropyl alcohol v/v)
was injected to ensure the absence of any peak at reten-
tion time of ALV‐2S,3R,4R, ALV‐2R,3R,4R, ALV‐
of the method. The resolution between ALV‐2R,3R,4R
and ALV‐2S,3R,4R (n = 6) obtained was 1.4.
2
S,3S,4S, ALV‐2R,3S,4S ALV isomer peak. Straight base-
line indicated that there was no carryover or any other
peak at retention time of analytes/isomers peak.
4
.6.3 | Limit of detection and limit of
quantification
Limit of detection and limit of quantification of the
method was calculated based on the signal to noise ratio
The retention time region of ALV isomers in blank was
considered for baseline noise measurement by using
empower 2. For 2S,3S,4S, 2R,3R,4R, 2R,3S,4S isomers,
limit of quantification were found 0.136, 0.285, and
4
.6.1 | System suitability
System suitability criteria were evaluated to ensure the
satisfactory performance of the method as well as ensure
the analytical method can be used within established
chromatographic conditions. System suitability results
are summarized in Table 2.
0
.153 μg/mL, respectively, and limit of detection were
found 0.048, 0.109, and 0.061 μg/mL, respectively. The
RSD for the area of the 2S,3S,4S, 2R,3R,4R, 2R,3S,4S iso-
%
4.6.2 | Precision study
mer in the precision study at LOQ level was 1.86, 1.41,
and 1.56%, respectively.
Precision study of the method was performed. The per-
centage relative standard deviation of the area of the
4.6.4 | Linearity study
TABLE 1 Chiral purity of alvimopan isomers
All the 3 isomers of the ALV were prepared in the range
from LOQ to 150% of the target concentration 0.15% was
prepared. Linear curve was plotted with a peak area of
ALV‐2R,3R,4R, ALV‐2S,3S,4S, ALV‐2R,3S,4S isomer
against its concentration. The correlation coefficient
obtained was 0.9991, 0.9995, and 0.9999, respectively.
Sr. No.
Isomer Name
Chiral Purity (% area)
1
2
3
4
2S,3R,4R
2R,3R,4R
2S,3S,4S
2R,3S,4S
99.2
68.5
99.2
99.6
4.6.5 | Accuracy
Accuracy study for ALV isomers was evaluated in tripli-
cate at 3 concentration levels (0.10%, 0.15% and 0.20%
with respect to ALV). The percentage recovery of
2S,3S,4S, 2R,3R,4R, 2R,3S,4S isomers in the samples at
LOQ level was 100.6, 98.0 and 100.9%, respectively, at
5
9
0% level 99.1, 98.8, 98.7%, respectively, at 100% level
8.7%, 99.3%, and 99.9%, respectively, and at 150% level
FIGURE
alvimopan chiral separation
5
Typical system suitability chromatogram of
99.6, 98.4, and 101.2%, respectively. From the above
results, the method was found accurate.