Essential oil of aristolochia trilobata: Synthesis, routes of exposure, acute toxicity, binary mixtures and behavioral effects on leaf-cutting ants

Article abstract of DOI:10.3390/molecules22030335

Plants of the genus Aristolochia have been frequently reported as important medicinal plants. Despite their high bioactive potential, to date, there are no reports of their effects on leaf-cutting ants. Therefore, the present study aimed to evaluate the insecticidal activity of the essential oil of Aristolochia trilobata and its major components on Atta sexdens and Acromyrmex balzani, two species of leaf-cutting ants. The bioassays were performed regarding routes of exposure, acute toxicity, binary mixtures of the major components and behavioral effects. Twenty-five components were identified in the essential oil of A. trilobata using a gas chromatographic system equipped with a mass spectrometer and a flame ionization detector. The components found in higher proportions were sulcatyl acetate, limonene, p-cymene and linalool. The essential oil of A. trilobata and its individual major components were efficient against A. balzani and A. sexdens workers when applied by fumigation. These components showed fast and efficient insecticidal activity on ants. The components acted synergistically and additively on A. balzani and A. sexdens, respectively, and caused a strong repellency/irritability in the ants. Thus, our results demonstrate the great potential of the essential oil of A. trilobata and its major components for the development of new insecticides.

Full text of DOI:10.3390/molecules22030335

molecules
Article
Essential Oil of Aristolochia trilobata: Synthesis,
Routes of Exposure, Acute Toxicity, Binary Mixtures
and Behavioral Effects on Leaf-Cutting Ants
1
1
2
1
Bruna Maria S. de Oliveira , Carlisson R. Melo , Péricles B. Alves , Abraão A. Santos ,
1
1
3
Ane Caroline C. Santos , Alisson da S. Santana , Ana Paula A. Araújo ,
Pedro E. S. Nascimento , Arie F. Blank and Leandro Bacci *
2
1
1,
1
Departamento de Engenharia Agronômica, Universidade Federal de Sergipe, São Cristóvão 49100-000,
Brazil; bruna_barreiros02@hotmail.com (B.M.S.d.O.); carlisson_melo@hotmail.com (C.R.M.);
abraaoufs@gmail.com (A.A.S.); aneccelestinos.18@gmail.com (A.C.C.S.);
alisson.0910.silva@gmail.com (A.d.S.S.); arie.blank@gmail.com (A.F.B.)
2
Departamento de Química, Universidade Federal de Sergipe, São Cristóvão 49100-000, Brazil;
periclesbalves@gmail.com (P.B.A.); pedro_ellison@hotmail.com (P.E.S.N.)
Departamento de Ecologia, Universidade Federal de Sergipe, São Cristóvão 491000-000, Brazil;
3
anatermes@gmail.com
*
Correspondence: bacci.ufs@gmail.com; Tel.: +55-79-3194-6929; Fax: +55-79-3194-6494
Academic Editor: Olga Tzakou
Received: 17 January 2017; Accepted: 15 February 2017; Published: 25 February 2017
Abstract: Plants of the genus Aristolochia have been frequently reported as important medicinal plants.
Despite their high bioactive potential, to date, there are no reports of their effects on leaf-cutting ants.
Therefore, the present study aimed to evaluate the insecticidal activity of the essential oil of Aristolochia
trilobata and its major components on Atta sexdens and Acromyrmex balzani, two species of leaf-cutting
ants. The bioassays were performed regarding routes of exposure, acute toxicity, binary mixtures of
the major components and behavioral effects. Twenty-five components were identified in the essential
oil of A. trilobata using a gas chromatographic system equipped with a mass spectrometer and a flame
ionization detector. The components found in higher proportions were sulcatyl acetate, limonene,
p-cymene and linalool. The essential oil of A. trilobata and its individual major components were
efficient against A. balzani and A. sexdens workers when applied by fumigation. These components
showed fast and efficient insecticidal activity on ants. The components acted synergistically and
additively on A. balzani and A. sexdens, respectively, and caused a strong repellency/irritability in the
ants. Thus, our results demonstrate the great potential of the essential oil of A. trilobata and its major
components for the development of new insecticides.
Keywords: Aristolochiaceae; insecticidal plant; monoterpenes; Formicidae; fumigation; synergism;
additive effect; repellency
1
. Introduction
Leaf-cutting ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) stand out as one of the most important pests
in Neotropical regions because of their high abundance and wide distribution and the enormous
economic losses they cause to agriculture and forestry [ ]. One of the factors responsible for the
1
population growth of leaf-cutting ants in disturbed areas is the increased density near forest edges
of pioneer plants, i.e., plants low in chemical defenses, emphasizing the importance of secondary
plant metabolites in regulating herbivore populations. In fact, plant chemical defenses have been
suggested as more promising components for the management of leaf-cutting ants than synthetic,
organic insecticides [2] because the latter cause diverse negative effects [3,4], increasing the search for
Molecules 2017, 22, 335; doi:10.3390/molecules22030335
www.mdpi.com/journal/molecules

Molecules 2017, 22, 335
2 of 17
environmentally safer and more efficient compounds in recent years. Plant essential oils stand out in
this context because they have shown toxicity by different routes of exposure and have caused several
behavioral effects on pest insects [5].
The essential oils of plants include several types of chemicals, with most of them consisting of
low-molecular-weight mono- and sesquiterpenes. One of the advantages of essential oils is that they
consist of complex mixtures of various chemical components, thus decreasing the probability of insect
resistance development. Other advantages of using these products include their rapid degradation in
the environment, fast effect on the target organism and relatively low toxicity to mammals [6]. Another
notable characteristic of essential oils compared with other products, such as conventional insecticides,
is the interaction between their components. When synergistic, these interactions may potentiate the
biological effects of essential oils, allowing the application of lower doses and, consequently, reducing
management costs and environmental risks [7]. These synergistic actions may occur between major
essential oil components, thus increasing the oil efficacy [8–10].
The family Aristolochiaceae Juss. comprises approximately 600 plant species distributed in
subtropical, tropical and temperate regions [11]. These species are frequently reported as important
medicinal plants [12]. Extracts from different species of Aristolochia have shown bioactivity against
insects [12,13]. However, the potential use of the essential oils of plants belonging to the family
Aristolochiaceae Juss. for pest control has not been investigated.
The present study evaluated the insecticidal activity of Aristolochia trilobata against workers of
the leaf-cutting ants Acromyrmex balzani and Atta sexdens with the following aims: (i) identifying and
quantifying the components present in A. trilobata essential oil; (ii) studying the route of exposure of
these insects to the essential oil and its major components; (iii) evaluating the toxicity of the essential
oil and its major components to Acromyrmex balzani and Atta sexdens workers; (iv) determining the
presence of synergistic, additive and/or antagonistic effects after the binary mixing of major essential
oil components; and (v) observing the behavioral responses of ant workers exposed to the essential oil
and its major components. Based on the results of the present study, the essential oil of A. trilobata and
its major components—sulcatyl acetate, limonene, p-cymene and linalool—showed insecticidal activity
against A. balzani and A. sexdens when applied by fumigation, affecting the survival and behavior of
these species.
2
. Results and Discussion
2
.1. Essential Oil Characterization
A total of 25 components, representing 98.72% of the total composition of A. trilobata essential
oil, were identified by a gas chromatographic system equipped with a mass spectrometer and a flame
ionization detector (GC/MS/FID), with the majority of the components belonging to the monoterpene
family (84.83%) (Table 1).
The most abundant monoterpenes included sulcatyl acetate (25.64%), limonene (24.80%),
p-cymene (10.41%) and linalool (9.51%) (Figure 1). In all, 13 components were found in concentrations
below 1%, and eight components ranged in concentration from 1% to 6% (Table 1). The aristolochic
acids, which are commonly found in plants of the genus Aristolochia [14], were not detected in
the present study. Studies have shown that aristolochic acids have nephrotoxic, carcinogenic and
mutagenic effects [15–17].

Molecules 2017, 22, 335
3 of 17
Table 1. Composition of the essential oil of Aristolochia trilobata characterized by GC/MS/FID.
Component
Retention Time (min) 1
Retention Index 1
Peak Area (%) 2
Tricyclene
Camphene
β-Pinene
8.985
9.469
929
944
973
984
985
1.88 ± 0.02
3.24 ± 0.012
1.05 ± 0.02
0.68 ± 0.03
0.64 ± 0.08
10.41 ± 0.03
24.80 ± 0.26
5.27 ± 0.42
9.51 ± 0.05
25.64 ± 0.45
0.64 ± 0.05
0.28 ± 0.02
0.79 ± 0.007
0.30 ± 0.012
1.15 ± 0.03
0.27 ± 0.01
0.27 ± 0.0
10.353
10.681
10.728
11.859
12.021
12.546
14.257
15.220
16.568
17.328
20.222
23.345
24.260
24.633
25.415
25.922
26.343
26.933
28.508
28.695
28.903
29.971
30.348
Myrcene
-Methyl-5-hepten-2-ol
p-Cymene
6
1020
1025
1041
1092
1122
1165
1189
1283
1391
1424
1438
1467
1485
1501
1524
1586
1594
1602
1646
1662
Limonene
Z)-β-Ocimene
Linalool
Sulcatyl acetate
Borneol
α-Terpineol
Bornyl acetate
β-Elemene
E)-Caryophyllene
Aromadendrene
(
(
Allo-Aromadendrene
Germacrene D
Bicyclogermacrene
δ-Cadinene
0.70 ± 0.007
1.52 ± 0.02
0.40 ± 0.06
3.04 ± 0.10
4.29 ± 0.13
0.49 ± 0.03
0.94 ± 0.05
0.55 ± 0.05
Spathulenol
Globulol
Viridiflorol
Isospathulenol
α-Cadinol
Monoterpenes (%)
Sesquiterpenes (%)
Total (%)
84.83
13.89
98.72
1
Retention index calculated using the Van den Dool and Kratz (1963) equation [18] relative to a homologous series
2
of n-alkanes (nC9-nC18). Values (
determinations obtained by GC/MS/FID.
±
SEM) for the content of components obtained by averaging three different
Figure 1. Four major components found in the essential oil of Aristolochia trilobata: (a) p-cymene;
(
b) limonene; (c) linalool; and (d) sulcatyl acetate.
The major components found in the essential oil of A. trilobata (sulcatyl acetate, limonene,
p-cymene and linalool) have all been previously reported [19], although their concentrations were
higher in the present study. Such variation is common, being determined by genetic and/or
environmental factors [8,20]. Sulcatyl acetate, the major component, has been considered a marker for
A. trilobata [19]. Components or classes of components can be considered markers for a plant species
when there is correlation with a biological effect [21].
2
.2. Routes of Exposure Bioassays
The essential oil of A. trilobata and its major components were effective against A. balzani and
A. sexdens workers when the route of exposure was fumigation. These components caused greater than

Molecules 2017, 22, 335
4 of 17
80% mortality after 48 h of exposure via fumigation. When the components were applied topically,
mortality was less than 70% and 20% for A. balzani and A. sexdens, respectively (Figure 2).
Figure 2. Toxicity of Aristolochia trilobata essential oil and its major components to workers of
mg 1)
−
Acromyrmex balzani (
A
) and Atta sexdens (
B
) 48 h after exposure by topical application (10
µg
·
and fumigation (10 µL·L− ).
1
Pogostemon cablin essential oil shows contact toxicity for the ant species Camponotus melanoticus,
Camponotus novogranadensis and Dorymyrmex thoracicus [22]; however, contact toxicity was not
observed in the present study. Therefore, the absence of toxicity of A. trilobata essential oil and
its major components to A. balzani and A. sexdens when topically applied possibly indicates that these
components did not penetrate the exoskeleton in lethal amounts when applied by this exposure route.
This barrier to penetration may be determined by the chemical composition of the insect cuticle and/or
by the physicochemical properties of the components present in the essential oil [8,23].
By contrast, all the components analyzed in the present study showed a strong effect when applied
by fumigation. The scarcity of studies on the fumigation toxicity of essentials oils to ants prevents
further comparisons. However, the essential oil components clearly have potential as fumigants
because they caused mortality above 80% [24].
2
.3. Acute Fumigation Toxicity
The essential oil of A. trilobata showed efficient insecticidal activity against both A. balzani and
A. sexdens (Table 2). The concentrations of the oil and its major components required to kill 50% of the
−
µL L
1
A. balzani and A. sexdens workers 48 h after exposure by fumigation ranged from 2.18 to 5.72
and 3.37 to 6.73 µL·L , respectively.
·
−
1
The monoterpenes linalool and sulcatyl acetate, when applied individually to A. balzani, were
.6 and 1.7 times more toxic than the essential oil of A. trilobata. By contrast, p-cymene and limonene
1
were less toxic to A. balzani than the essential oil. For A. sexdens, the limonene, linalool and sulcatyl
acetate components showed toxicity similar to that of the essential oil of A. trilobata, and only the
monoterpene p-cymene was 1.6 times more toxic than the essential oil (Table 2).

Molecules 2017, 22, 335
5 of 17
The tolerance of the ant species to the studied components varied. Comparing the two species,
A. sexdens workers were more tolerant to the essential oil of A. trilobata and the components linalool and
sulcatyl acetate, whereas A. balzani was more resistant to the monoterpene p-cymene. Limonene caused
similar toxicity in both ant species (Table 2). In general, the greater susceptibility of A. balzani (9.26 mg
body weight) compared with A. sexdens (15.09 mg body weight) may be related to its lower body
volume and, consequently, higher specific area, which increases its exposure to the components [25–27].
Volatiles are known to penetrate through the spiracles; therefore, the chemical composition of the
cuticle within such structures can also contribute to a greater or lesser penetration of the components
present in the essential oil of A. trilobata, leading to variations in species tolerance [23].
Table 2. Toxicity of Aristolochia trilobata essential oil and its major components to Acromyrmex balzani
and Atta sexdens workers measured 48 h after exposure by fumigation.
◦
LC50 (95% CI) (µL·L−1
LC90 (95% CI) (µL·L−1
2
χ
Treatment
N
of Insects
)
)
Slope
p-Value
Acromyrmex balzani
Essential oil
p-Cymene
Limonene
Linalool
Sulcatyl acetate
239
490
546
238
266
3.76 (3.46–4.13)
9.33 (7.65–12.68)
16.53 (13.08–22.83)
10.34 (9.39–11.68)
17.51 (10.35–40.99)
3.38 (3.11–3.76)
3.24
2.44
4.98
1.48
6.75
0.15
13.73
0.61
3.55
1.67
0.98
0.05
0.74
0.81
0.56
4.96 (4.41–5.56)
5.72 (5.32– 6.14)
2.40 (1.92–3.21)
2.18 (2.06–2.30)
Atta sexdens
Essential oil
p-Cymene
Limonene
Linalool
Sulcatyl acetate
476
420
420
308
330
5.48 (4.66–6.34)
3.37 (2.69–4.04)
5.38 (4.56–6.28)
5.34 (4.67–6.28)
6.73 (5.41–10.40)
20.94 (16.78–28.33)
17.71 (13.38–26.86)
28.79 (21.33–44.74)
19.88 (14.24–34.61)
20.75 (12.56–60.72)
2.20
1.77
1.75
2.24
2.61
0.24
0.36
5.18
1.72
1.94
0.88
0.83
0.15
0.57
0.61
Alternatively, the greater tolerance of A. sexdens compared with A. balzani may be associated with
target site insensitivity or more efficient metabolism by detoxifying enzymes [23 25]. Considering
,
that many mono- and sesquiterpenes present in the essential oil of A. trilobata act in insects by
inhibiting acetylcholinesterase [28], changes in this enzyme and/or the speed with which it catalyzes
the hydrolysis of the neurotransmitter acetylcholine may also be responsible for the higher tolerance
of ants of the genus Atta compared with those of the genus Acromyrmex. Likewise, higher rates
of metabolism for A. trilobata terpenes promoted by enzymes such as cytochrome P450-dependent
monooxygenase, glutathione S-transferases and esterases may be responsible for the higher tolerance
of ants of the genus Atta [23,25].
The survival of A. balzani and A. sexdens workers exposed to the 90% lethal concentration (LC )
90
of the essential oil of A. trilobata and its individual major components was significantly reduced over
2
2
time (by the log-rank test,
χ = 463.2, df = 5 and p < 0.001 for A. balzani; χ = 338.0, df = 5 and p < 0.001
for A. sexdens) (Figure 3). The rapid insecticidal action of A. trilobata essential oil indicates that its
toxicity is mainly mediated by the interaction of its constituents with target sites in the insect nervous
system [29].
The effectiveness of insect fumigation with essential oils has been attributed to the uptake of oil
through the spiracles [30]. This occurs because the spiracles are not an effective barrier against gas
penetration. Thus, fumigation is the fastest and most efficient method for mono- and sesquiterpenes
to reach the insect nervous system, which is the likely target site of these substances [31,32]. Certain
essential oils have shown neurotoxic effects, causing hyperactivity, tremors and insect paralysis after
exposure [29]. In fact, in the present study, it was observed that the essential oil of A. trilobata and its
major components caused typical symptoms in ants of neurotoxic poisoning, such as the loss of motor
coordination and the disruption of normal activities [33].
Previous studies have attributed the toxicity of the mono- and sesquiterpenes present in plant
essential oils to several mechanisms, such as inhibition of the enzyme acetylcholinesterase; interference
with the activity of octopamine, a neuromodulator found only in invertebrates [28]; interference with

Molecules 2017, 22, 335
6 of 17
calcium channels modulated by
γ
-aminobutyric acid (GABA) [34]; and effects at vulnerable sites, such
as cytochrome P450 [23]. However, it was not possible to determine with certainty which of these
mechanisms operated in the insects evaluated in the present study; therefore, further studies on the
mechanisms underlying the biochemical and pharmacological effects of the essential oil of A. trilobata
and its major components are needed.
The survival of A. balzani and A. sexdens after 60 h of exposure exceeded 90% in the control group.
In general, the essential oil of A. trilobata and its major components acted faster on A. sexdens than
on A. balzani (Figure 3). The comparatively long time required by the oil and its components to kill
A. balzani workers indicates a possible future use of these products in granulated baits for this species
because there would be time for specimens to carry the toxic components into the nest [10,35]. By
contrast, the rapid mortality of A. sexdens suggests a possible direct use in nests via a dry power
or by thermal fogging. However, the practical use of these products requires the development of
formulations suitable for each method of application [36]. The essential oil components p-cymene and
linalool caused 100% mortality of both ant species in less than 35 h of exposure, whereas A. trilobata
essential oil and limonene caused 100% mortality only in A. sexdens. Sulcatyl acetate also caused 100%
mortality in A. sexdens; however, this effect required 47 h of exposure (Figure 3). These differences were
reflected in the average time of survival (LT ) observed for each component (Figure 4). The average
50
time of survival was not estimated for the insects in the control group because of the low mortality
rate (<10%).
The essential oil of A. trilobata and its major components acted very quickly, killing half of the
population of A. sexdens in less than 20 h. However, the essential oil of A. trilobata, limonene and
sulcatyl acetate required 37.7, 43.5 and 35.8 h, respectively, to kill 50% of A. balzani (Figure 4).
Figure 3. Survival curves of Acromyrmex balzani (A) and Atta sexdens (B) workers exposed to the LC90
of Aristolochia trilobata essential oil and its major components by fumigation. The LC90 was obtained in
the toxicity bioassays.

Molecules 2017, 22, 335
7 of 17
Figure 4. Mean LT for Acromyrmex balzani (A) and Atta sexdens (B) workers exposed by fumigation to
the LC90 of the essential oil of Aristolochia trilobata and its major components. The boxes indicate the
median and the dispersion (upper and lower quartiles). The dashed line represents the average of the
LT50 values. The LC90 was obtained in the toxicity bioassays.
2
.4. Toxicity of Binary Mixtures
Bioassays using binary mixtures of the major components of the A. trilobata essential oil revealed
that these components acted synergistically to cause toxicity in A. balzani. By contrast, the component
combinations had an additive effect in A. sexdens (Table 3). The synergistic effect observed in A. balzani
for the major components of the essential oil of A. trilobata can help explain the greater toxicity of the
essential oil (i.e., a mixture of all components) to A. balzani than to A. sexdens.
The synergism that occurs between components of plant essential oils may result in a higher
bioactivity than that observed when the components are used individually. Such effects are common
for terpenes, which are hydrophobic compounds that exhibit synergistic effects with other components,
solubilizing them and facilitating their dispersion through membranes [28]. Thus, this type of action
increases the efficacy of these products, allowing the use of smaller amounts in a mixture to achieve
satisfactory efficiency levels [37].
In addition to the interactions between the major components, there is still the possibility of other
combinations showing synergistic effects. Minor components can act as synergists, increasing the
efficacy of major components [10] and playing important roles in various oil properties, such as hypo-
or hydrophilic attraction, fixation [8] and cell penetration [38].
By contrast, the binary mixtures had an additive effect in A. sexdens, with no potentiated effects
when the essential oil components were combined. Studies have shown that complex interactions
between the components of essential oils may vary with the circumstances [27,39]. Therefore, the
additive effect of the essential oil components observed for A. sexdens may be explained by the different
metabolic and physiological capabilities of the ant species when challenged with component mixtures.

Molecules 2017, 22, 335
8 of 17
Table 3. Effect of binary mixtures of the major components composing Aristolochia trilobata essential oil on Acromyrmex balzani and Atta sexdens workers measured 48 h
after exposure by fumigation.
Mortality (%)
Conc. 1 (µL·L−1
)
χ
2
Component A
Component B
Pure Component
Observed A Observed B
Binary Mixture
Effect
Expected
Observed
Acromyrmex balzani
Sulcatyl acetate
Sulcatyl acetate
Sulcatyl acetate
Sulcatyl acetate
Sulcatyl acetate
Sulcatyl acetate
Linalool
Linalool
Linalool
2.30 + 2.30
2.06 + 2.06
2.30 + 2.30
2.06 + 2.06
2.30 + 2.30
2.06 + 2.06
3.21 + 3.21
1.92 + 1.92
3.21 + 3.21
1.92 + 1.92
5.56 + 5.56
4.41 + 4.41
21.43
7.14
21.43
7.14
21.43
7.14
16.07
10.71
16.07
10.71
51.79
44.64
19.64
10.71
25.00
5.36
3.57
3.57
23.21
3.57
5.36
5.36
14.29
17.86
36.86
17.09
41.07
12.12
24.23
10.46
35.55
13.90
20.57
15.50
58.67
54.53
67.86
39.29
62.50
23.21
46.43
32.14
67.86
30.36
66.07
26.79
87.50
82.14
26.06
28.82
11.18
10.16
20.32
44.95
29.35
19.47
100.67
8.22
Synergistic
Synergistic
Synergistic
Synergistic
Synergistic
Synergistic
Synergistic
Synergistic
Synergistic
Synergistic
Synergistic
Synergistic
p-Cymene
p-Cymene
Limonene
Limonene
p-Cymene
p-Cymene
Limonene
Limonene
Limonene
Limonene
Linalool
Linalool
Linalool
p-Cymene
14.16
13.99
p-Cymene
Atta sexdens
p-Cymene
p-Cymene
p-Cymene
p-Cymene
p-Cymene
p-Cymene
Linalool
Linalool
Linalool
Linalool
Limonene
Limonene
1
Linalool
Linalool
Limonene
4.04 + 4.04
2.69 + 2.69
4.04 + 4.04
2.69 + 2.69
4.04 + 4.04
2.69 + 2.69
6.28 + 6.28
4.67 + 4.67
6.28 + 6.28
4.67 + 4.67
6.28 + 6.28
4.56 + 4.56
33.93
19.64
33.93
19.64
33.93
19.64
55.36
42.86
55.36
42.86
39.29
26.79
50.00
39.29
16.07
8.93
67.86
17.86
50.00
23.21
75.00
35.71
82.14
48.21
66.96
51.21
44.55
26.82
78.76
33.99
77.68
56.12
88.84
63.27
89.16
62.09
60.71
44.64
33.93
19.64
92.86
44.64
87.50
60.71
98.21
75.00
91.07
76.79
0.58
0.84
2.53
1.92
2.52
3.34
1.24
0.38
0.99
2.18
0.04
3.48
Additive
Additive
Additive
Additive
Additive
Additive
Additive
Additive
Additive
Additive
Additive
Additive
Limonene
Sulcatyl acetate
Sulcatyl acetate
Limonene
Limonene
Sulcatyl acetate
Sulcatyl acetate
Sulcatyl acetate
Sulcatyl acetate
LC50 confidence intervals for the components used in the toxicity bioassays. The pairs were formed using an efficiency rank based on the lower and upper concentration limits of the
LC50 confidence intervals of the most effective components in mixtures. For Acromyrmex balzani, sulcatyl acetate was the most toxic compound, followed in decreasing order of toxicity by
linalool, p-cymene and limonene. For Atta sexdens the decreasing order of toxicity was: p-cymene, followed by linalool, limonene and sulcatyl acetate.

Molecules 2017, 22, 335
9 of 17
2
.5. Behavioral Bioassays
The behavior of avoiding surfaces treated with A. trilobata essential oil and its major components
was evaluated in two assays: a repellency (avoidance without previous contact) assay and an irritability
(avoidance after contact) assay (Figures 5 and 6).
Figure 5. Repellency of the essential oil of Aristolochia trilobata and its major components to
Acromyrmex balzani and Atta sexdens workers after a 15 min exposure to treated filter paper in glass
dishes (9 cm diameter).
Acromyrmex balzani
Atta sexdens
Untreated
Treated
Untreated
Treated
Essential oil
Essential oil
*
*
p-cymene
p-cymene
*
*
Limonene
Limonene
Linalool
*
*
Linalool
*
*
Sulcatyl acetate
Sulcatyl acetate
Moving
Still
*
*
100
75
50
25
0
25
50
75
100 100
75
50
25
0
25
50
75
100
Irritability(%)
Irritability (%)
Figure 6. Irritability to the essential oil of Aristolochia trilobata and its major components of
Acromyrmex balzani and Atta sexdens workers after a 15 min exposure in filter paper dishes (6 cm
diameter). * Indicates a significant difference between the treated and untreated areas of the dish
(Kruskal-Wallis test, p < 0.05).
The essential oil of A. trilobata and its major components were repellent to A. balzani and A. sexdens.
On average, 53% and 46% of the experimental time elapsed before A. balzani and A. sexdens individuals
first contacted the treated surface, respectively (Figure 5). There were no significant differences in the
2
observed repellency among the treatments for A. balzani (Kruskal-Wallis:
χ
= 6.61; df = 4; p = 0.158)
2
and A. sexdens (Kruskal-Wallis:
χ
= 2.6; df = 4; p = 0.167). The behavior of avoiding the components
without contact confirms that the ants detect the essential oil and its constituents through chemical cues,
avoiding the components when given the choice [40]. The repellency of plant secondary metabolites
has been demonstrated for a variety of insect orders [10].

Molecules 2017, 22, 335
10 of 17
All the tested substances caused great irritability in A. balzani and A. sexdens. There were no
significant differences in the amount of time the insects remained on the untreated side between
2
2
A. balzani (Kruskal-Wallis:
χ = 2.93; df = 4; p = 0.569) and A. sexdens (Kruskal-Wallis: χ = 6.81; df = 4;
p = 0.146). In general, the insects spent more than 92% of the total time (immobile and moving) on
the untreated side after contact (Figure 6). The irritability behavior confirms that the ants, besides
detecting the essential oil and its constituents by chemical communication, also have single-pore
sensilla responsible for detecting the oil components upon contact [40].
Understanding the behavior of ants upon their exposure to bioactive products is essential because
leaf-cutting ants have resources to reduce the effect of chemical components harmful to them or
their fungus. Chemical communication, olfactory sensitivity, learning capacity, selectivity and the
production of antibiotic substances are the main behavioral factors that may hinder control [41].
Repellency and/or irritability effects may help prevent these behaviors of leaf-cutting ants in
control areas.
3
. Materials and Methods
3
.1. Sampling Site and Plant Material
The plant material was collected in a mangrove area in the municipality of Pirambu, State of
◦
0
◦
0
Sergipe (SE), Brazil (10 40 42” S, 36 52 25” W). The annual average temperature and rainfall in the
◦
region is 26 C and 1650 mm, respectively, with the rainy season from March to August [42]. Stems
(1 cm diameter) of the species Aristolochia trilobata were collected from plants in the vegetative growth
stage between 9:00 a.m. and 12:00 p.m. from February to September 2014. The plant material was dried
◦
at 60 ± 1 C for four days in a drying oven (Marconi MA 037) [43]. A voucher specimen was deposited
in the herbarium of the Federal University of Sergipe (Universidade Federal de Sergipe—UFS),
registration no. ASE 35.723. The herbarium is located in the Department of Biology (Departamento de
Biologia), Biological Sciences and Health Center (Centro de Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde—CCBS),
municipality of São Cristóvão, SE, Brazil, zip code 49100-000.
3
.2. Essential oil Extraction and Analysis
The essential oil was obtained by hydrodistillation in a Clevenger-type apparatus [44].
Subsequently, the essential oil was separated from the aqueous phase and stored in an amber bottle in
◦
a freezer at −4 C until used.
The analysis of the essential oil components was performed by a GC/MS/FID (GCMSQP2010
Ultra, Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan) equipped with an AOC-20i autoinjector (Shimadzu). The
®
separations were performed on 30 m, Rtx -5MS Restek fused-silica capillary column (5% diphenyl–95%
dimethylpolysiloxane) with a 0.25 mm internal diameter and 0.25 mm film thickness. Helium 5.0 was
−
1
used as the carrier gas at a flow rate of 1.0 mL·min
.
◦
−1
The injection temperature was 280 C, and 1.0
µ
L (10 mg
·
mL ) of sample was injected at a split
◦
ratio of 1:30. The oven temperature was programmed isothermally at 50 C for 1.5 min, followed by an
◦
−1
◦
◦
−1 ◦
increase of 4 C
·
min until reaching 200 C and then an increase of 10 C min up to 300 C, which
·
was maintained for 5 min. For the GC/MS, the ionic capture detector impact energy was 70 eV. The
fragments were analyzed by a quadrupolar system programmed to filter fragments/ions with m/z
from 40 to 500 Da and detected by an electron multiplier. The data were processed with the aid of
GCMS Post-run Analysis software (Labsolutions, Shimadzu).
The ionization process for GC/FID was conducted using the flame from hydrogen gas 5.0
−
1
−1
(30 mL
·
min ) and synthetic air (300 mL min ). The formed ions and the generated electric current
·
were amplified and processed, and the data were analyzed with GCMS Post-run Analysis software
(Labsolutions, Shimadzu).
The essential oil components were identified by a comparison of their retention times with those
available in the literature [45]. The retention index was determined using the Van den Dool and Kratz

Molecules 2017, 22, 335
11 of 17
(1963) equation [18], for a homologous series of n-alkanes (nC9-nC18). The essential oil components
were also identified by comparing their mass spectra with the spectra available in the WILEY8, NIST107
and NIST21 equipment databases, which allow the comparison of mass spectral data sets and the use
of a minimum similarity index of 80%.
3
.3. Extraction of Major Components
The compounds individually composing at least 6% of A. trilobata essential oil were considered
major components and included the following compounds: p-cymene, limonene, linalool and
®
sulcatyl acetate. Chemical standards were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Steinheim, Germany),
with the exception of (
±
)-sulcatyl acetate, which was synthesized by chemical reduction of
6
-methyl-5-hepten-2-one (sulcatone, Scheme 1).
Scheme 1. Scheme of sulcatyl acetate synthesis showing (
c) sulcatyl acetate.
a) sulcatone; (b) sulcatol; and
(
®
Briefly, sulcatone (500 mg, 3.97 mmol, Sigma-Aldrich ) was added into a 50 mL round-bottom
flask and dissolved in methanol (10 mL) before NaBH (160 mg, 3.97 mmol) was added. The mixture
4
was stirred magnetically at room temperature for 1 h. The reaction was then stopped by adding 1 mL
of distilled water. The extraction of the product [(
with ethyl acetate (20 mL), which was then removed by rotary evaporation. Sulcatol was completely
dried with N providing a 98% yield (500 mg, 3.91 mmol), and then treated pyridine (1 mL) and acetic
±
)-6-methyl-5-hepten-2-ol (sulcatol)] was performed
2,
anhydride (1 mL) for 24 h at room temperature. Subsequently, 10% HCl (4 mL) was added to the
reaction mixture, and 2-acetyl-6-methyl-5-heptene (sulcatyl acetate) was extracted from the reaction
mixture with ethyl acetate (20 mL). The solvent was removed by rotary evaporation. The sulcatyl
acetate was completely dried with N , and an 83% yield (550 mg, 3.24 mmol) was obtained.
2
The sulcatyl acetate was purified on freshly prepared TLC (thin layer chromatography) plates.
Silica gel plates (1.0 mm thick) were prepared by evenly spreading ~30 g of Macherey-Nagel silica gel
6
0 in 80 mL of distilled water on glass sheets (20 cm
×
20 cm). After evaporation of the water at room
◦
temperature, the TLC plates were activated in an oven at 110 C for 30 min. For visualization, a solution
of anisaldehyde in acid and ethanol (ethyl alcohol (90 mL) + sulfuric acid (5 mL) + anisaldehyde (5 mL)
◦
+
acetic acid (1 mL) was used, followed by heating at 110 C. For each preparative TLC plate, 300 mg
of sulcatyl acetate was applied and eluted twice using as solvent hexane/ethyl acetate in proportion
1
13
9
.5:0.5 (v/v). The analyses by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy ( H- and C-NMR) (AVANCE
III 400 NMR spectrometer, Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA) and infrared spectroscopy (IR, Spectrum BX
Fourier Transform spectrometer, Perkin-Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA) were performed to confirm the
structure of the major constituent, sulcatyl acetate (6-methyl-5-hepten-2-yl acetate) as described in [19].
3
.4. Insects
Acromyrmex balzani and Atta sexdens workers were obtained directly from nests located at the UFS
◦
0
◦
0
campus, municipality of São Cristóvão, SE, Brazil (10 54 S, 37 04 W). The ants were kept in nest
fragments in round plastic containers (50 cm
relative humidity) for 24 h prior to testing, and only distilled water was provided during this period.
◦
×
20 cm) at ambient conditions (25–27 C and 60%
±
5%

Molecules 2017, 22, 335
12 of 17
3
.5. Bioassays
The bioassays were conducted in a laboratory of the UFS in the municipality of São Cristóvão,
SE, Brazil. All the treatment compounds were diluted in acetone solvent (Panreac, UV-IR-HPLC-GPC
PAI-ACS, 99.9% purity). Preliminary tests showed that this use of acetone did not affect ant survival.
The treatments consisted of A. trilobata essential oil and its following major components: p-cymene,
limonene, linalool and sulcatyl acetate. Only acetone was used in the control groups.
3
.5.1. Routes of Exposure
The toxicity of A. trilobata essential oil and its major components was evaluated by two routes
of exposure: contact by topical application and fumigation. To initially determine the treatment
−
1
efficacy by these two routes of exposure, a dose of 10
µg
·
mg was used in the contact bioassay, and
−
µL L
1
a concentration of 10
·
was used in the fumigation bioassay. Preliminary tests with other ant
species indicated that this dose and this concentration are good indicators of efficiency. Further tests
were conducted with the more efficient exposure route.
In both bioassays (contact and fumigation), the experimental design was completely randomized,
with four replications. The experimental units were placed in a biochemical oxygen demand (BOD)
◦
incubator with a 25
±
1 C temperature, >70% relative humidity and a 12 h photoperiod. The specimens
used were standardized by size for each ant species. For dose calculations, the mean body weight of
A. balzani and A. sexdens was obtained by measuring the weight of 30 specimens with an analytical
balance (AUW220D, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) with a readability of 0.01 mg. The mortality was assessed
48 h after the bioassays were assembled. Any specimens that did not move or respond to stimulation
were considered dead.
In the contact bioassays, each experimental unit consisted of a glass Petri dish (9 cm
by filter paper moistened with 0.5 mL of distilled water and containing seven workers. Preliminary
×
2 cm) lined
tests indicated that these moisture conditions and seven ants per Petri dish favor long ant survival.
◦
The dishes with the ants were kept in a freezer at
−
4 C for 1 min to reduce ant activity and allow
topical application of the treatments. Preliminary tests indicated that this brief chill does not affect
®
ant survival. Using a 10
on the prothorax with 1
µ
L microsyringe (Hamilton , Renon, NV, USA) each individual was treated
L of acetone containing the essential oil of A. trilobata, one or two major oil
µ
components or no additional chemicals (control group). The dishes containing the treated insects were
sealed with PVC film and placed in the BOD incubator.
In the fumigation bioassay, each replicate consisted of a glass container (250 mL) lined with filter
paper moistened with 0.5 mL of distilled water and containing seven workers. Preliminary tests
indicated that these moisture conditions and seven ants per container favor long ant survival. The
®
treatments (essential oil of A. trilobata and its major components) were applied with a 10
µL Hamilton
2
microsyringe to 1 cm pieces of filter paper (501.009, Unifil, Carvalhaes LTDA, Campo Limpo Paulista,
São Paulo, Brazil). Each treated filter paper (1 cm ), the dispersion substrate for the volatiles, was
2
secured to the bottom of a container lid using a thread. The thread kept the filter paper at the center of
the glass container out of the reach of the ants, thus avoiding contact of the ants with the filter paper.
A 10
µL aliquot of the solution of A. trilobata essential oil and of each major oil compound was used.
The containers were sealed with a plastic lid and PVC film and then placed in the BOD incubator.
3
.5.2. Acute Toxicity Caused by Fumigation
Acute fumigation toxicity was analyzed using the LCs and LTs of the A. trilobata essential oil and
its major components determined for the two ant species. The procedures used to determine the LC50
and LC90 were similar to those used in the fumigation bioassays (see Section 3.5.1). However, 14 and
1
0 concentrations of the A. trilobata essential oil and each major component, respectively, were used to
determine the A. balzani and A. sexdens concentration-mortality curves.

Molecules 2017, 22, 335
13 of 17
The survival curves and LT50 were determined following the procedures used in the fumigation
bioassay (see Section 3.5.1). However, only one concentration was used (the LC90 determined by the
bioassay explained above for each treatment), with 10 repetitions. The mortality was assessed every
30 min during the first 2 h of the experiment, every 60 min up to 7 h, every 120 min up to 23 h and,
subsequently, every 240 min up to 60 h.
3
.5.3. Toxicity of the Binary Mixtures
The acute fumigation toxicity of binary mixtures containing the major components of A. trilobata
oil (p-cymene, limonene, linalool and sulcatyl acetate) were determined by procedures similar to those
used in the fumigation bioassay (see Section 3.5.1).
Initially, the LC50 values of the most effective components determined in the fumigation bioassay
(see Table 2) were used to establish the concentrations appropriate to bioassay the binary mixtures.
The pairs were formed using an efficiency rank based on the lower and upper concentration limits of
the LC50 confidence intervals of the most effective components in 1:1 mixtures.
The major components were applied individually and in combination at those concentrations
on each ant species for comparison. The observed and expected mortalities were compared, and the
effects of the binary mixtures were classified as additive, synergistic or antagonistic.
3
.5.4. Behavioral Bioassays
The behavioral effects of the A. trilobata essential oil and its major components on A. balzani and
A. sexdens workers were separated into repellency (avoidance without previous contact) and irritability
(avoidance after contact) [46].
The bioassays were performed in glass Petri dishes (9 cm
×
2 cm) lined with filter paper, which
was divided into treated and untreated (acetone only) halves. The treated halves of the papers received
.4 mL of the treatment solutions at a concentration of 1%, which was insufficient to kill the specimens
during the study period. The treated and untreated paper halves were placed in an exhaust hood for
0
5
min for solvent evaporation after affixing them to the bottom of the dishes with double-sided tape.
A single adult A. balzani or A. sexdens worker was placed in the center of the Petri dish. For
each combination of species
×
treatment, 20 replicates were used, totaling 200 Petri dishes. The
observations consisted of the continuous recording for 15 min of the amount of time that the ant spent
both stationary and mobile on each side of the dish and that elapsed before the ant first contacted the
treated area. The ant was considered to have made contact when it remained longer than 1 s in the
treated area.
The strength of repellency was determined by measuring the time required for the ant to contact
the treated half of the filter paper, with longer time indicating greater treatment repellency. By contrast,
irritability was determining by measuring the amount of time the ant remained (still and/or moving)
on each side of the plate after the first contact, with longer time spent on the untreated half of the filter
paper indicating greater irritability.
3
.6. Statistical Analysis
The mortality results for the bioassays concerning routes of exposure, fumigation acute toxicities
for the determination of LCs and binary mixture toxicities were corrected for the mortality rate in the
control group using Abbott’s formula [47].
To determine efficiencies for the routes of exposure, the present study used an insecticide
registration criterion of the Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Food Supply of Brazil (Ministério
da Agricultura e Pecuária do Brasil—MAPA). The MAPA regulation states that an insecticide must
result in a minimum mortality of 80% [24].
Probit analyses were performed to determine the concentration-mortality curves for the A. trilobata
essential oil and its major components in each ant species. The curves with a probability greater than
2
0
.05 for the acceptance of the null hypothesis by a
χ
test were accepted. The LC50 and LC90 and their

Molecules 2017, 22, 335
14 of 17
respective 95% confidence intervals were obtained using the accepted curves and Statistical Analysis
System (SAS) software [48]. The LCs were compared and considered to differ significantly from one
another when their 95% confidence intervals (CIs95) did not overlap.
The results of the LT bioassays were subjected to survival analysis using SAS software [48].
This nonparametric analysis allows the estimation of survival curves obtained by the Kaplan-Meier
estimator using the insect survival rate from the beginning to the end of the experiment. The times
required for each of the treatments to kill 50% of each ant species were determined.
In the binary mixture bioassays, the expected mortalities were calculated according to the
following formula described by [
and Oa and Ob are the observed mortality caused by the pure components.
9
]. E = Oa + Ob (1 − Oa), where E is the expected mortality,
2
The effects of the binary mixtures were classified by comparisons between the calculated
χ and
2
2
2
the tabulated χ (χ
= 3.84; df = 1; α = 0.05). χ was calculated using the following formula:
tab
2
(
Om − E)
2
χ =
,
E
2
where Om is the observed mortality of the binary mixture. If
χ
< 3.84 for the pair analyzed, there is
cal
2
an additive affect (also called a noneffect). If
χ
> 3.84 for the pair analyzed, there is a synergistic
cal
or antagonistic effect. In the latter case, the expected and observed mortalities of the binary mixtures
should be noted.
The behavioral bioassay data were analyzed for conformity with the assumptions of normality
and homogeneity of variance using SAS software [48]. Subsequently, the repellency and irritability
data were subjected to the nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test, followed by Wilcoxon’s test at p < 0.05
using SAS software [48].
4
. Conclusions
A. trilobata essential oil and its major components, p-cymene, limonene, linalool and sulcatyl
acetate, show rapid and high fumigation toxicity to the leaf-cutting ant species A. balzani and A. sexdens.
All the treatments caused not only significant reductions in the survival of both ant species but also
strong behavioral effects of repellency and irritability. For A. balzani, the major components interacted
synergistically, enabling the use of lower doses to control this species. Further studies are needed to
elucidate the effects of these components in natural environments. The present study demonstrates
the potential of the essential oil of A. trilobata and its major components as alternatives to the use of
conventional insecticides and as promising sources of new molecules with insecticidal activity.
Acknowledgments: The authors would like to thank Marta C. V. Farias (technician) and Ana Paula N. Prata
of the Herbarium of UFS for identifying the A. trilobata species. The Leandro de Sousa S. for identifying the
ants. Thanks for financial support to the Brazilian Federal Agency for the Support and Evaluation of Graduate
Education (Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior—CAPES), the Brazilian National
Council for Scientific and Technological Development (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e
Tecnológico—CNPq) and the Foundation for the Support of Research and Technological Innovation of the State of
Sergipe (Fundação de Apoio à Pesquisa e à Inovação Tecnológica do Estado de Sergipe—Fapitec).
Author Contributions: B.M.S.O. and C.R.M. participated in the experimental design, realization of bioassays,
data analysis and writing of the manuscript; P.B.A. taked part in the analysis of the essential oil and synthesis
of sulcatyl acetate; A.A.S., A.C.C.S., A.d.S.S. and P.E.N. participated in the experimental design, realization of
bioassays and review of the manuscript; A.F.B. taked part in the extraction and analysis of the essential oil; L.B.
and A.P.A.A. participated in the conception, experimental design, analysis and interpretation of data, as well
writing and correction of the manuscript. All authors contributed important intellectual criticism, readed and
approved the final version of the manuscript.
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Molecules 2017, 22, 335
15 of 17
References
1
.
Antunes, E.C.; Della Lucia, T.M.C. Consumo foliar em Eucalyptus urophylla por Acromyrmex laticeps
nigrosetosus Forel (Hymenoptera-Formicidae). Cienc. Agrotecnol. 1999, 23, 208–211.
2
.
Della Lucia, T.M.C.; Marinho, C.G.S.; Ribeiro, M.M.R. Perspectiva no manejo de formigas-cortadeiras. In
Insetos Sociais: Da Biologia a Aplicação; Vilela, E.F., Santos, I.A., Schoereder, J.H., Campos, L.A.O., Serrão, J.E.,
Lino-Neto, J., Eds.; Editora da Universidade Federal de Viçosa: Viçosa, Brazil, 2008; Volume 1, pp. 371–380.
Fonseca, A.R.; Batista, D.R.; Amaral, D.P.; Campos, R.B.F.; Silva, C.G. Formigas (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)
urbanas em um hospital no município de Luz, Estado de Minas Gerais. Acta Sci. Health Sci. 2010, 32, 29–34.
3
.
[CrossRef]
4
.
.
Knaak, N.; Fiuza, L. Potencial dos óleos essenciais de plantas no controle de insetos e microrganismos.
Neotrop. Biol. Conserv. 2010, 5, 120–132. [CrossRef]
Bacci, L.; Lima, J.K.A.; Araújo, A.P.A.; Blank, A.F.; Silva, I.M.A.; Santos, A.A.; Santos, A.C.C.; Alves, P.B.;
Picanço, M.C. Toxicity, behavior impairment, and repellence of essential oils from pepper-rosmarin and
patchouli to termites. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 2015, 156, 66–76. [CrossRef]
5
6.
7.
8.
9.
Machado, L.A.; Silva, V.B.; Oliveira, M.M. Uso de extratos vegetais no controle de pragas em horticultura.
Biológico 2007, 69, 103–106.
Ribeiro, B.; Guedes, R.N.; Oliveira, E.; Santos, J. Insecticide resistance and synergism in Brazilian populations
of Sitophilus zeamais (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). J. Stored Prod. Res. 2003, 39, 21–31. [CrossRef]
Bakkali, F.; Averbeck, S.; Averbeck, D.; Idaomar, M. Biological effects of essential oils—A review.
Food Chem. Toxicol. 2008, 46, 446–475. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Hummelbrunner, L.A.; Isman, M.B. Acute, Sublethal, Antifeedant, and Synergistic Effects of Monoterpenoid
Essential Oil Compounds on the Tobacco Cutworm, Spodoptera litura (Lep., Noctuidae). J. Agric. Food Chem.
2
001, 49, 715–720. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
0. Nerio, L.S.; Olivero-Verbel, J.; Stashenko, E. Repellent activity of essential oils: A review. Bioresour. Technol.
010, 101, 372–378. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
1. Heinrich, M.; Chan, J.; Wanke, S.; Neinhuis, C.; Simmonds, M.S.J. Local uses of Aristolochia species and
content of nephrotoxic aristolochic acid 1 and 2—A global assessment based on bibliographic sources.
J. Ethnopharmacol. 2009, 125, 108–144. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
1
1
2
1
2. Messiano, G.B.; Vieira, L.; Machado, M.B.; Lopes, L.M.X.; de Bortoli, S.A.; Zukerman-Schpector, J. Evaluation
of Insecticidal Activity of Diterpenes and Lignans from Aristolochia malmeana against Anticarsia gemmatalis.
J. Agric. Food Chem. 2008, 56, 2655–2659. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
1
1
1
3. Jbilou, R.; Ennabili, A.; Sayah, F. Insecticidal activity of four medicinal plant extracts against Tribolium
castaneum (Herbst) (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2006, 5, 936–940.
4. Jeude, S. Quality vs. quantity: The effect of aristolochic acids on preference and performance of a
non-specialist herbivore. Purs. J. Undergrad. Res. Univ. Tenn. 2011, 2, 109–119.
5. FDA (Food and Drug Administration). Letter to Health Professionals Regarding Safety Concerns Related to
the Use of Botanical Products Containing Aristolochic Acid. Available online: http://www.fda.gov/Food/
RecallsOutbreaksEmergencies/SafetyAlertsAdvisories/ucm111200.htm (accessed on 17 February 2016).
6. Hoang, M.L.; Chen, C.-H.; Sidorenko, V.S.; He, J.; Dickman, K.G.; Yun, B.H.; Moriya, M.; Niknafs, N.;
Douville, C.; Karchin, R.; et al. Mutational Signature of Aristolochic Acid Exposure as Revealed by
Whole-Exome Sequencing. Sci. Transl. Med. 2013, 5, 197ra102. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
1
1
7. Pacheco, A.G.; Silva, T.M.; Manfrini, R.M.; Sallum, W.S.T.; Duarte, L.P.; Piló-Veloso, D.; Alcântara, A.F.C.;
Knupp, V.F. Estudo químico e atividade antibacteriana do caule de Aristolochia esperanzae kuntze
(Aristolochiaceae). Quim. Nova 2010, 33, 1649–1652. [CrossRef]
1
1
2
2
8. Van den Dool, H.; Kratz, P.D. A generalization of the retention index system including linear temperature
programmed gas—Liquid partition chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 1963, 11, 463–471. [CrossRef]
9. Santos, D.d.A.; Alves, P.B.; Costa, E.V.; Franco, C.R.P.; Nepel, A.; Barison, A. Volatile constituents of
Aristolochia trilobata L. (Aristolochiaceae): A rich source of sulcatyl acetate. Quim. Nova 2014, 37, 977–981.
0. Gobbo-Neto, L.; Lopes, N.P. Plantas medicinais: Fatores de influência no conteúdo de metabólitos
secundários. Quim. Nova 2007, 30, 374–381. [CrossRef]
1. ANVISA Regulamento Técnico Para Medicamentos Fitoterápicos. Available online: http://www.4.anvisa.
gov.br/base/visadoc/CP/CP[5840-2-0].pdf (accessed on 17 February 2016).

Molecules 2017, 22, 335
16 of 17
2
2
2
2
2
2. Albuquerque, E.L.D.; Lima, J.K.A.; Souza, F.H.O.; Silva, I.M.A.; Santos, A.A.; Araújo, A.P.A.; Blank, A.F.;
Lima, R.N.; Alves, P.B.; Bacci, L. Insecticidal and repellence activity of the essential oil of Pogostemon cablin
against urban ants species. Acta Trop. 2013, 127, 181–186. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
3. Bacci, L.; Crespo, A.L.; Galvan, T.L.; Pereira, E.J.; Picanço, M.C.; Silva, G.A.; Chediak, M. Toxicity of
insecticides to the sweetpotato whitefly (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) and its natural enemies. Pest Manag. Sci.
2
007, 63, 699–706. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
4. Silva, G.A.; Picanço, M.C.; Bacci, L.; Crespo, A.L.B.; Rosado, J.F.; Guedes, R.N.C. Control failure likelihood
and spatial dependence of insecticide resistance in the tomato pinworm, Tuta absoluta. Pest Manag. Sci. 2011
7, 913–920. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
,
6
5. Bacci, L.; Picanço, M.C.; da Silva, É.M.; Martins, J.C.; Chediak, M.; Sena, M.E. Seletividade fisiológica
de inseticidas aos inimigos naturais de Plutella xylostella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) em brássicas.
Cienc. Agrotecnol. 2009, 33, 2045–2051. [CrossRef]
6. Leite, G.L.D.; Picanço, M.; Guedes, R.N.C.; Gusmão, M.R. Selectivity of insecticides with and without
mineral oil to Brachygastra lecheguana (Hymenoptera: Vespidae), a predator of Tuta absoluta (Lepidoptera:
Gelechiidae). Ceiba 1998, 39, 191–194.
2
2
2
7. Yu, S.J. Selectivity of insecticides to the spined soldier bug (Heteroptera: Pentatornidae) and its Lepidopterous
prey. J. Econ. Entomol. 1988, 81, 119–122. [CrossRef]
8. Rattan, R.S. Mechanism of action of insecticidal secondary metabolites of plant origin. Crop Prot. 2010, 29,
9
13–920. [CrossRef]
9. Zhu, B.C.-R.; Henderson, G.; Yu, Y.; Laine, R.A. Toxicity and Repellency of Patchouli Oil and Patchouli
Alcohol against Formosan Subterranean Termites Coptotermes formosanus Shiraki (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae).
J. Agric. Food Chem. 2003, 51, 4585–4588. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
3
0. Yang, P.; Ma, Y.; Zheng, S. Adulticidal Activity of Five Essential Oils against Culex pipiens quinquefasciatus.
J. Pestic. Sci. 2005, 30, 84–89. [CrossRef]
3
1. Pontes, W.J.T.; de Oliveira, J.C.S.; da Câmara, C.A.G.; Gondim Júnior, M.G.C.; de Oliveira, J.V.;
Schwartz, M.O.E. Atividade acaricida dos óleos essencias de folhas e frutos de Xylopia sericea sobre o
ácaro rajado (Tetranychus urticae Koch). Quim. Nova 2007, 30, 838–841. [CrossRef]
3
2. Sugiura, M.; Horibe, Y.; Kawada, H.; Takagi, M. Insect spiracle as the main penetration route of pyrethroids.
Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2008, 91, 135–140. [CrossRef]
3
3. Kostromytska, O.S.; Buss, E.A.; Scharf, M.E. Toxicity and neurophysiological effects of selected insecticides
on the mole cricket, Scapteriscus vicinus (Orthoptera: Gryllotalpidae). Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2011, 100,
2
7–34. [CrossRef]
3
3
3
3
4. Isman, M.B. Botanical insecticides, deterrents, and repellents in modern agriculture and an increasingly
regulated world. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2006, 51, 45–66. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
5. Della Lucia, T.M.C.; Araújo, M.S. Formigas cortadeiras: Atualidades no combate. In Manejo Integrado-Doenças,
Pragas e Plantas Daninhas; Zanbolim, L., Ed.; Suprema: Visconde do Rio Branco, MG, Brazil, 2000; pp. 245–273.
6. Trongtokit, Y.; Rongsriyam, Y.; Komalamisra, N.; Apiwathnasorn, C. Comparative repellency of 38 essential
oils against mosquito bites. Phyther. Res. 2005, 19, 303–309. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
7. Kosti c´ , I.; Petrovi c´ , O.; Milanovi c´ , S.; Popovi c´ , Z.; Stankovi c´ , S.; Todorovi c´ , G.; Kosti c´ , M. Biological activity
of essential oils of Athamanta haynaldii and Myristica fragrans to gypsy moth larvae. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2013, 41,
1
7–20. [CrossRef]
8. Cal, K. Skin Penetration of Terpenes from Essential Oils and Topical Vehicles. Planta Med. 2006, 72, 311–316.
CrossRef]
3
3
4
4
[
9. Khalfi, O.; Sahraoui, N.; Bentahar, F.; Boutekedjiret, C. Chemical composition and insecticidal properties of
Origanum glandulosum (Desf.) essential oil from Algeria. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2008, 88, 1562–1566. [CrossRef]
0. Jayasekara, T.K.; Stevenson, P.C.; Hall, D.R.; Belmain, S.R. Effect of Volatile Constituents from Securidaca
longepedunculata on Insect Pests of Stored Grain. J. Chem. Ecol. 2005, 31, 303–313. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
1. Marinho, C.G.S.; Della Lucia, T.M.C.; Picanço, M.C. Fatores que Dificultam o Controle das Formigas
Cortadeiras. Revista Bahia Agrícola; SEAGRI-BA 2006; pp. 18–21. Available online: http://www.seagri.ba.
gov.br/content/fatores-que-dificultam-o-controle-das-formigas-cortadeiras (accessed on 17 February 2016).
2. Bomfim, L.F.C.; Costa, I.V.G.; Benvenuti, S.M.P. Sergipe Diagnóstico do Município de Pirambu; Aracaju:
CPRM 2002; pp. 1–13. Available online: http://www.cprm.gov.br/publique/media/hidrologia/mapas_
publicacoes/Cadastro_Infraestrutura_Sergipe/Pirambu.pdf (accessed on 17 February 2016).
4

Molecules 2017, 22, 335
17 of 17
4
4
3. De Sant’ana, T.C.P.; Blank, A.F.; Vieira, S.D.; de Arrigoni-Blank, M.F.; de Jesus, H.C.R.; Alves, P.B. Influência
do armazenamento de folhas secas no óleo essencial de patchouli (Pogostemon cablin Benth.). Quim. Nova
010, 33, 1263–1265. [CrossRef]
2
4. Ehlert, P.A.D.; Blank, A.F.; Arrigoni-Blank, M.F.; Paula, J.W.A.; Campos, D.A.; Alviano, C.S. Tempo de
hidrodestilação na extração de óleo essencial de sete espécies de plantas medicinais. Rev. Bras. Plantas Med.
2
006, 8, 79–80.
4
4
5. Adams, R.P. Identification of Essential Oil Components by Gas Chromatograpy/Mass Spectroscopy, 4th ed.; Allured
Publishing Corporation: Carol Stream, IL, USA, 2007.
6. Cordeiro, E.M.G.; Corrêa, A.S.; Venzon, M.; Guedes, R.N.C. Insecticide survival and behavioral avoidance
in the lacewings Chrysoperla externa and Ceraeochrysa cubana. Chemosphere 2010, 81, 1352–1357. [CrossRef]
[
PubMed]
7. Abbott, W.S. A Method of Computing the Effectiveness of an Insecticide. J. Econ. Entomol. 1925, 18, 265–267.
CrossRef]
8. SAS Institute. SAS/STAT 9.1 User’s Guide; SAS Institute: Cary, NC, USA, 2004.
4
4
[
Sample Availability: Not areavailable.
©
2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access
article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution
(CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).