2
026
Y. De Sanctis et al. / Journal of Organometallic Chemistry 689 (2004) 2025–2028
SHELXTL
-
PLUS [7]. Crystal data: C H O Os , formula
20 8 10 3
2
. Experimental
weight ¼ 977.86, monoclinic, space group P21=c, a ¼
1
ꢁ
ꢁ
ꢁ
9
1
0
:740ð7Þ A, b ¼ 8:936ð3Þ A, c ¼ 25:963ð12Þ A, b ¼
2
3
2
7
.1. Synthesis of cluster [Os (l-H)(l -g -C10H )
CO)10] 1
ꢁ
3
00:39ð4Þ°, V ¼ 2223ð2Þ A , Z ¼ 4, green prisms, 0.60 ꢁ
.30 ꢁ 0.20 mm. 4176 measured reflections (h ¼ 0 to 11,
(
k ¼ 0 to 10, l ¼ ꢀ30 to 30), 3927 independent reflec-
A solution of [Os (CO) (MeCN) ] (0.050 g, 0.054
3
10
2
2
tions, R ¼ 0:0754, R ¼ 0:0482, wRðF Þ ¼ 0:1259 for
int
mmol) and azulene (0.013 g, 0.101 mmol) in cyclohexane
3
3
067 reflections with I P 2rðI Þ, 298 parameters.
(
50 cm ) was refluxed under nitrogen. By following the
0
0
colour change from yellow to green, the changes in
the IR spectrum, and using analytical TLC, we stopped
the reaction after 40 min when it appeared that the
starting cluster had been consumed. TLC work-up (sil-
ica, eluent petroleum spirit, b.p. 40–60 °C) gave unre-
acted azulene, the known deep yellow-orange cluster 2
3
. Results and discussion
Azulene was added to
Os3(CO)10(MeCN)2] in cyclohexane and the mixture
a
suspension of
[
refluxed during which time the color of the solution
(
1
10% yield) and a green band, which yielded compound
(15%). Cluster 2 was characterized by comparison of
its spectroscopic data with those published [2] and
changed from yellow to green. The green azulene de-
1
rivative [Os (l-H)(l -g -C H )(CO) ] 1 was isolated
3
2
10
7
10
1
ꢀ
1
in 15% yield. The H NMR spectrum confirmed the
presence of a hydride (d )14.40) and there were seven
multiplets for the remaining seven hydrogen atoms on
the ligand. Two signals coupled by 4.1 Hz for the 5-
membered ring and analysis of the remainder of the
spectrum, showed that there were still five hydrogens on
the 7-membered ring, confirming that the metallation
had occurred at the 1-position on the 5-membered ring.
spectral data for 1 are: m(CO)/cm (cyclohexane): 2095
m, 2074 s, 2061 s, 2054 ms, 2037 m, 2012 ms, 2000 s,
1
1
2
974 w; H NMR (CDCl3, 20 °C, J in Hz): d 9.34 (d, H ,
4
J2;3 ¼ 4:1), 8.54 (ddd, H , J4;5 ¼ 9:7, J4;6 ¼ 0:9,
8
J
¼ 0:8), 8.25 (dd, H , J ¼ 9:2, J ¼ 0:9), 8.11
3
;4
7;8
6;8
7
(
ddd, H , J ¼ 9:7, J ¼ 9:2, J ¼ 0:9), 7.99 (ddd,
5 6
4
6
;7
7;8
5;7
H , J ¼ 9:7, J ¼ 9:7, J ¼ 0:9), 7.88 (dddd, H ,
;5
5;6
5;7
3
J6;7 ¼ 9:7, J5;6 ¼ 9:7, J4;6 ¼ 0:9, J6;8 ¼ 0:9), 7.46 (dd, H ,
1
3
1
13
An analysis of the C NMR spectrum, including H–
13C COSY spectra confirmed these findings.
J2;3 ¼ 4:1, J3;4 ¼ 0:8), )14.40 (s, OsHOs); C NMR
1
9
3
(
(
(
CDCl3, 20 °C): d 29.7 (C ), 72.0 (C ), 122.6 (C ), 128.9
7 5 4 6 8
The molecular structure of 1 (Fig. 1) confirmed the
site of metallation but also that the 1-azulenyl ligand is
attached to the cluster through the 1-position alone. The
organic ligand is planar and orientated perpendicularly
to the metal triangle (dihedral angle between the azulene
C ), 132.4 (C ), 138.4 (C ), 141.1 (C ), 151.1 (C ), 154.0
2
1
0
C ), 178.5 (C ). Crystals of 1 suitable for X-ray
structure determination were obtained by slow evapo-
ration of a hexane solution at room temperature.
1
and the Os planes ¼ 85.9°, See Table 1 for selected bond
2
.2. Thermolysis of cluster [Os
CO)10] 1
3
(l-H)(l -g -C10
H
7
)
3
2
lengths and angles). The metal triangle has three Os–Os
ꢁ
(
bonds with the shortest [Os(1)–Os(2) ¼ 2.7638(11) A]
associated with the bridging C(1) atom of the azulenyl.
The other two Os–Os bonds are similar but longer
A solution of cluster 1 (0.030 g) in cyclohexane (50
3
cm ) was refluxed under nitrogen for 4 h by which time
the green solution had become yellow-orange. TLC
work-up gave [Os (CO) ] (3%), unreacted cluster 1
3
12
(10%) and cluster 2 (80%), which was characterized by
comparison of its spectra with those reported [2].
2
.3. Crystal structure determination for cluster 1
The structure was determined using a Rigaku AFC7S
diffractometer (graphite-monochromated Mo Ka radi-
ꢁ
ation, 0.71073 A) at 298(2) K. Corrections for L effects
p
and semi-empirical absorption corrections [5] were ap-
plied. Structure solution was by direct methods [6] and
expanded using Fourier techniques [7]. All non-H atoms
were refined anisotropically, using a riding model for
H-atoms with thermal parameters 1.2 ꢁ Ueq of the cor-
responding C atoms. The final cycle of full-matrix least-
2
squares was based on F . teXsan crystallographic
software package for data reduction and graphical
representations was used [8], with refinement using
Fig. 1. ORTEP view (35% probability ellipsoids, H atoms omitted for
clarity) of the molecular structure of 1 in the crystal.