Campo and Larock
We have also addressed the question of regiochemistry
in the cyclocarbonylation of 3′-substituted 2-iodobiphe-
nyls9 (entries 7 and 8). The cyclocarbonylation of the
electron-rich 2-iodo-3′-methylbiphenyl (12) and the elec-
tron-poor 3-(2-iodophenyl)benzaldehyde (15) afforded
similar 9:1 regiochemical mixtures in excellent yields. In
both cases, the predominant isomer arises from ring
closure distal to the substituent. These experimental
results seem to indicate that there is only a weak
electronic effect during the cyclization process, and that
a more important steric effect favors the less hindered
isomers 13 and 16.
[2,1-d]furan-10-one (29) (entry 14). On the other hand,
the cyclocarbonylation of 3-(2-iodophenyl)benzofuran (30),
in which ring closure takes place onto the electron-rich
benzofuran ring, produced the desired benz[b]indeno[1,2-
d]furan-6-one (31) in 81% yield (entry 15). In these
benzofuran-containing systems, cyclocarbonylation oc-
curred onto the more reactive benzofuran moiety of the
biaryl (entry 15) but failed to do so onto the less electron-
rich phenyl ring of the biaryl (entry 14). Similar electronic
effects were observed with o-halobiaryls containing either
benzothiophene or thiophene rings. For instance, 3-iodo-
2-phenylbenzothiophene19 (32) produced a 67% yield of
10-oxo-10H-benz[b]indeno[1,2-d]thiophene (33) (entry
16), while 3-(2-bromophenyl)thiophene21 (34) produced an
86% yield of indeno[2,1-d]thiophen-8-one22 (35) with
excellent C-2 regioselectivity (entry 17). It is noteworthy
that switching from the oxygen heterocycle of entry 14
to the sulfur analogue of entry 16 resulted in a substan-
tial increase in yield. In like manner, the pyrrole deriva-
tive N-(2-iodophenyl)pyrrole (36) gave a 96% yield of
pyrrolo[1,2-a]indol-9-one23 (37) (entry 18).
2
0
This cyclocarbonylation does not appear to be signifi-
cantly affected by the presence of substituents ortho to
the halo group. For example, the palladium-catalyzed
reaction of 2-iodo-3-methoxybiphenyl10 (18) produced
1
-methoxyfluoren-9-one (19) in 99% yield (entry 9).
Interestingly, this palladium-catalyzed transformation
can be readily employed on biaryl systems containing
either polycyclic or heterocyclic rings. Thus, treatment
of 9-iodo-10-phenylphenanthrene (20) with carbon mon-
oxide under our standard reaction conditions produced
indene[1,2-l]phenanthren-13-one11 (21) in 98% yield.
The yield of the palladium-catalyzed cyclocarbonylation
of o-halobiaryls containing an indole was dependent not
only on electronic effects but also on the nature of the
protecting group on the indole nitrogen. To illustrate,
1
2
Similarly, 2-bromo-1-phenylnaphthalene (22) produced
a 96% yield of benzo[c]flouren-7-one13 (23) (entry 11).
Furthermore, cyclocarbonylation of the nitrogen-contain-
2
-iodo-3-phenyl-1H-indole (38) and 3-iodo-2-phenyl-1H-
1
4
ing heterocycle 4-iodo-3-phenylisoquinoline (24) pro-
duced 11-oxoindeno[1,2-c]isoquinoline15 (25) in a 95%
yield (entry 12).
24
indole (42), both of which have unprotected nitrogens,
failed to give the desired indenoindolones under the
standard reaction conditions (entries 19 and 21). How-
ever, the N-methyl-substituted indole analogues 2-iodo-
This palladium reaction was also effective for the
double cyclocarbonylation of 2,2′′′-dibromo-p-quaterphe-
nyl16 (26) (entry 13). Under the standard reaction condi-
tions, but 14 h reaction time, substrate 26 produced the
desired [2,2′]bifluorenyl-9,9′-dione17 (27) in 87% yield.
So far, we have demonstrated the utility of this
chemistry by preparing a variety of fluorenones in high
yields with good regioselectivity from o-halobiaryls con-
taining six-membered ring aromatics, such as benzene,
naphthalene, phenanthrene, etc. (Table 2, entries 1-13).
We next turned our attention to applying this palladium
methodology to o-halobiaryls in which one of the aromatic
rings is a five-membered ring heterocycle, such as a
benzofuran, a benzothiophene, a thiophene, a pyrrole, or
an indole (entries 14-24). We began by studying the
electronic effects of the carboannulation of o-iodobiaryls
containing a benzofuran. When 3-iodo-2-phenylbenzofu-
ran18 (28) was subjected to the standard reaction condi-
tions, it failed to give any of the desired benz[b]indeno-
1
-methyl-3-phenylindole (40) and 3-iodo-1-methyl-2-
phenylindole (44) produced the desired 5-methyl-5H-
25
indeno[2,1-b]indol-6-one (41) and 5-methyl-5H-indeno-
26
[
1,2-b]indol-10-one (45) in 49% and 21% yields, respec-
tively (entries 20 and 22). In an attempt to increase the
yield of indeno[1,2-b]indol-10-one, 3-iodo-2-phenyl-1-(4-
toluenesulfonyl)indole (46) was prepared and subse-
quently cyclocarbonylated under our standard reaction
27
conditions to produce 5H-indeno[1,2-b]indol-10-one (43)
in a 45% yield (entry 23). It is worth emphasizing that
compound 46 led to the cyclocarbonylated product 43 in
which the sulfonamide functionality had been removed
under the relatively mild reaction conditions employed.
This unusual deprotection was also observed in the
cyclocarbonylation of 3-(2-bromophenyl)-1-(4-toluene-
sulfonyl)indole (47), which led to 5H-indeno[2,1-b]indol-
6
-one (39) in 55% yield (entry 24). Furthermore, 42% of
the 3-(2-bromophenyl)-1-(4-toluenesulfonyl)indole (47)
was recovered at the end of the reaction, which seems to
(
9) These starting materials were prepared using the procedure of
the following: Hart, H.; Harada, K.; Du, C. J . Org. Chem. 1985, 50,
104.
10) This starting material was prepared using the procedure of the
following: Huisgen, R.; Rist, H. Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1955, 594, 137.
11) (a) Sprinzak, Y. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1958, 80, 5449. (b) Horspool,
3
(18) Arcadi, A.; Cacchi, S.; Fabrizi, G.; Marinelli, F.; Moro, L. Synlett
1999, 9, 1432.
(19) This starting material was prepared using the procedure of the
following: Larock, R. C.; Harrison, L. W. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106,
4218.
(20) Sauter, F.; Dzerovicz, A. Monatsh. Chem. 1969, 100, 913.
(21) Martelli, G.; Spagnolo, P.; Tiecco, M. J . Chem. Soc. B 1968, 901.
(22) MacDowell, D. W. H.; Patrick, T. B. J . Org. Chem. 1967, 32,
2441.
(
(
W. M. J . Chem. Soc. C 1971, 400. (c) Pandey, B.; Mahajan, M. P.;
Tikare, R. K.; Muneer, M.; Rath, N. P.; Kamat, P. V.; George, M. V.
Res. Chem. Intermed. 1991, 15, 271.
(
12) Wittig, G.; Hellwinkel, D. Chem. Ber. 1964, 97, 769.
(13) (a) Fu, J .; Zhao, B.; Sharp, M. J .; Snieckus, V. J . Org. Chem.
1
991, 56, 1683. (b) Harvey, R. G.; Abu-shqara, E.; Yang, C. J . Org.
Chem. 1992, 57, 6313.
14) This aryl iodide was prepared by the procedure of the follow-
ing: Huang, Q.; Hunter, J . A.; Larock, R. C. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 2973.
15) (a) Wawzonec, S.; Stowell, J . K.; Karll, R. E. J . Org. Chem. 1966,
1, 1004. (b) Dusemund, J .; Kroeger, E. Arch. Pharm. 1987, 320, 617.
(23) (a) Mazzola, V. J .; Bernady, K. F.; Franck, R. W. J . Org. Chem.
1967, 32, 486. (b) Flitsch, W.; Kappenberg, F.; Schmitt, H. Chem. Ber.
1978, 111, 2407.
(24) This substrate was prepared by the procedure of the following:
Bocchi, V.; Palla, G. Synthesis 1982, 1096.
(25) (a) Kozikowski, A. P.; Ma, D. Tetrahedron Lett. 1991, 32, 3317.
(b) Borsche, W.; Klein, A. Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1941, 548, 64.
(26) Itahara, T.; Sakakibara, T. Synthesis 1978, 607.
(27) Eisch, J . J .; Abraham, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1976, 1647.
(
(
3
(
16) Fujioka, Y. Bull. Chem. Soc. J pn. 1984, 57, 3494.
17) Barnett, M. D.; Daub, G. H.; Hayes, N.; Ott, D. G. J . Am. Chem.
(
Soc. 1959, 81, 4583.
5
618 J . Org. Chem., Vol. 67, No. 16, 2002