as divinylbenzene.4 Alternatively, the ligands can be grafted
to an existing cross-linked polystyrene resin containing
properly functionalized reactive groups. The degree of cross-
linking and the structure of the cross-linking agent strongly
influence the activity and selectivity of the catalyst.
Practical drawbacks of cross-linked polystyrene supports
are their low mechanical strength and restricted thermo-
oxidative stability. If the spherical beads are not sufficiently
stable to withstand stirring over a long period of time, their
breakdown will result in the formation of a fine powder,
which severely limits their handling during filtration and
recycling of the supported catalyst. Likewise, grafting of
functionalized ligands to chemically modified polystyrene
resins may result in undesired side reactions and incomplete
grafting; also functionalities may remain in the support
material that could reduce the effectiveness of the polymeric
catalyst. Thus, the development of new approaches for facile
anchoring of chiral catalysts to mechanically stable, inert
polymeric supports is of special interest. Fibrous supports
have received very little attention in the present context.5
Also, to our knowledge, radiation-induced grafting has not
been employed previously for immobilization of chiral
catalysts or auxiliaries on polymer supports. Nevertheless,
electron beam accelerators are not only readily available but
also widely used in the polymer processing industry.6
We report here the immobilization of chiral ligands on
chemically inert, mechanically stable polyethylene fibers by
electron beam induced preirradiation grafting using styrene
as a comonomer.7 Application of the resulting materials as
effective and recyclable catalysts in enantioselective organic
transformations is described.
The monomeric ligands selected for the present study
together with the corresponding supported catalysts are
depicted in Figure 1. The styrenic R,R,R′,R′-tetraaryl-1,3-
dioxolane-4,5-dimethanol (TADDOL) derivative 1 was pre-
pared as described previously by Seebach and co-workers.8
The protected L-proline-derived ligand precursor 2 was
prepared in 69% yield by addition of 4-(vinylphenyl)-
magnesium chloride to L-proline N-ethylcarbamate methyl
ester obtained by one-pot N,O-protection of L-proline.9
Refluxing of 2 in KOH/MeOH gave the chiral amino alcohol
3 in 84% yield after purification by flash chromatography.10
Ligand 1 was grafted on preirradiated polyethylene fibers
with styrene comonomer to produce the polymeric catalyst
P1 with a loading of 0.15 mmol/g.11 Reference catalyst P1B
Figure 1. Monomeric ligands and model compounds 1-5 and the
corresponding polymer-supported catalysts P1-P3 of the present
study.
was prepared by supporting ligand 1 on polystyrene beads
with a loading of 0.6 mmol/g by suspension copolymerization
of 1 with styrene using divinylbenzene as a cross-linking
agent.8 The protected prolinol 2 was grafted in a fashion
similar to that described for 1 to produce the fiber-supported
catalyst P2 with a loading of 0.2 mmol/g as confirmed by
nitrogen analysis. The deprotected prolinol functionalized
polymer P3 with similar loading was obtained in quantitative
yield by refluxing P2 in KOH/MeOH followed by drying in
vacuo. The homogeneous reference ligands 4 and 5 were
purchased from commercial sources.
(4) Syntheses and Separations Using Functional Polymers; Sherrington,
D. C., Hodge, P., Eds.; Wiley: Chichester, 1988.
Watanabe, K.; Koizumi, T.; Ito, K. React. Polym. 1995, 24, 219. Polymer-
supported 3 was employed as catalyst in the Diels-Alder reaction of
methacrolein with cyclopentadiene, resulting in high yield and high exo-
selectivity but a low level of asymmetric induction (ee ) 25%).
(5) Grafting of a phenolic TADDOL derivative to a chloromethylated
ethylene-styrene copolymer has been described briefly, see: Altava, B.;
Burguete, M. I.; Escuder, B.; Luis, S. V.; Salvador, R. V.; Fraile, J. M.;
Mayoral, J. A.; Royo, A. J. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 3126.
(6) McGinniss, V. D. In Encyclopedia of Polymer Science and Engineer-
ing, 2nd ed.; Kroschwitz, J. I., Ed.; Wiley: New York, 1986; Vol. 4, p
418.
(7) (a) Stannett, V. T. Radiat. Phys. Chem.1990, 35, 82. (b) Na¨sman, J.
H.; Sundell, M. J.; Ekman, K. B. U.S. Patent 5 326 825, 1994.
(8) Seebach, D.; Marti, R. E.; Hintermann, T. HelV. Chim. Acta 1996,
79, 1710.
(9) Bhaskar Kanth, J. V.; Periasamy, M. Tetrahedron 1993, 49, 5127.
(10) A low-yield synthesis of 3 from TMS-protected L-proline and its
copolymerization with styrene to insoluble polymeric catalyst has been
reported previously, see: (a) Itsuno, S.; Kamahori, K.; Watanabe, K.;
Koizumi, T.; Ito, K. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1994, 5, 523. (b) Itsuno, S.;
(11) Loading of P1 was approximated gravimetrically. In a typical
grafting procedure, 10 g of cut PE fibers (0.7 Dtex) were irradiated under
an inert atmosphere to a total dose of 200 kGy using an electron accelerator
operating at an accelerator voltage of 175 kV and beam current of 5 mA.
The irradiated fibers were immersed in a reaction mixture containing 15 g
of styrene, 1.8 g of 1, 40 mL of EtOH, and 20 mL of water. To the reaction
mixture were additionally added 0.03 g of divinyl benzene and 0.155 g of
a 25 wt % solution of dibenzoyl peroxide. The mixture was purged with
N2 before initiating the reaction and the grafting was allowed to continue
to completion for approximately 6 h. The temperature was raised to 80 °C
for 2 h, and the resulting fibers were subsequently filtered and washed with
EtOH and dichloroethane. The weight gain of the recovered fibers was
determined and the conversion of the monomers calculated to 80%.
2552
Org. Lett., Vol. 3, No. 16, 2001