Paper
RSC Advances
procedure as follows: initially, the mixture of deionized water
and ethanol were placed at room temperature with constant
vigorous stirring. To this mixture add TTIP drop wise which is
dissolved in anhydrous ethanol. As the observed gel was relo-
4. Conclusion
In conclusion, a simple, efficient and environmentally benign
procedure has been developed using mesoporous vanadium ion
doped titania nanoparticles (V–TiO2) as robust heterogeneous
nanocatalyst for the synthesis of polyhydroquinoline derivatives
via esteemed Hantzsch reaction of arylaldehyde, b-ketoester,
ꢀ
cated into Teon lined autoclave and heated at 80 C for 24 h.
The accomplished solid was dried at room temperature and
nally tagged as bare TiO2 nanoparticles (TiO2 NPs). At last, the
obtained TiO2 NPs were washed with excess of ethanol to
eradicate organic moieties.25 In the same way, metal ion
dopants were incorporated through adding appropriate
amounts of vanadyl acetylacetonate into distilled water fore-
going to the hydrolysis of TTIP. By varying concentration of
vanadyl acetylacetonate, diverse nanoparticles were synthe-
sized. The nanoparticles were tagged as 0.1 V–TiO2 (0.1 at% V in
TiO2), 0.25 V–TiO2 (0.25 at% V in TiO2), 0.55 V–TiO2 (0.55 at% V
in TiO2) and 2.0 V–TiO2 (2.0 at% V in TiO2).
ꢀ
dimedone and ammonium acetate at 80 C under solvent-free
conditions as multi-component synthesis. This protocol was
successfully pertinent to a wide range of structurally diverse
arylaldehydes with b-ketoester, dimedone and ammonium
acetate to afford the corresponding polyhydroquinoline deriv-
atives. The advantages of performing the Hantzsch reaction in
the presence of V–TiO2 NPs as catalyst can be summarized as
follows: (1) use of a safe, non-volatile, non-corrosive and easily
handled V–TiO2 NPs; (2) recovery of V–TiO2 NPs at the end of the
reactions by simple ltration and washing; (3) desired products
are obtained in admirable yields under mild reaction condi-
tions; and (4) the reactions are carried out under solvent-free
conditions with economic benets. Excellent reusability of the
catalyst and ease of isolation of product are the other added
advantages that make this approach an attractive alternative for
the synthesis of these polyhydroquinoline derivatives.
3.3. Catalyst characterization techniques
Powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of the synthesized
samples were recorded on X'Pert Pro Diffractometer of M/s
Panalytical, Netherlands make using Cu Ka radiation. Trans-
mission electron microscopy (TEM) measurements were done
on Tecnai transmission electron microscope of FEI make.
Samples were suspended in 30 mL of acetone, and the
suspension was sonicated for 30 min. Aer that, suspension
was placed on carbon coated copper grids of 3 mm dia and
dried at room temperature prior to the analysis. Nitrogen
adsorption measurements were done on ASAP 2020 surface area
analyzer of Micrometrics, USA. FT-IR measurements were done
as KBr pellets on Perkin Elmer, USA instrument. X-ray photo-
electron spectroscopy (XPS) data was recorded on KRATOS AXIS
165 instrument. TiO2, V–TiO2 nanoparticles are conrmed by
Energy-Dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) spectrum that
reveals the presence of Ti, V and O elements. Au and C signals
could be due to gold coating and carbon lm supporting the
specimen during SEM observation.
Acknowledgements
Authors express deep sense of gratitude to Ravi K. Gujjula,
Principal, KPRIT, Hyderabad and also special thanks to IISER,
Bhopal.
Notes and references
1 R. Shan, C. Velazquez and E. E. Knaus, J. Med. Chem., 2004,
47, 254–261.
2 P. S. Eharkar, B. Desai, H. Gaveria, B. Varu, R. Loriya,
Y. Naliapara, A. Shah and V. M. Kulkarni, J. Med. Chem.,
2002, 45, 4858–4867.
3.4. Catalytic activity: synthesis of polyhydroquinoline
derivatives via Hantzsch reaction
3 T. Tsuruo, H. Iida, M. Nojiri, S. Tsukagoshi and Y. Sakurai,
Cancer Res., 1983, 43, 2905–2910.
To a mixture of methyl/ethyl acetoacetate (1.0 mmol), dime-
done (1.0 mmol), arylaldehyde (1.0 mmol) and ammonium
acetate (2.0 mmol), catalytic amount (2.0 mol%) of V–TiO2
nanoparticle was added at room temperature under stirring.
The reaction mixture was heated on oil bath at 80 ꢀC. The
reaction advancement was monitored by TLC. Aer the
completion of reaction, it was cooled to room temperature
and the resultant reaction mixture was washed with brine and
extracted with ethyl acetate. The catalyst was separated out by
ltration from the extraction mixture. Organic layer was
separated, dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate and concen-
trated under reduced pressure. The crude product was then
puried by re-crystallization from hot ethanol and water to
afford 1,4-dihydroquinoline derivatives in high yield. The
4 A. Krauze, S. Germane, O. Eberlins, I. Sturms, V. Klusa and
G. Duburs, Eur. J. Med. Chem., 1999, 34, 301–310.
5 G. S. Poindexter, M. A. Bruce, J. G. Breitenbucher,
M. A. Higgins, S. Y. Sit, J. L. Romine, S. W. Martin,
S. A. Ward, R. T. McGovern, W. Clarke, J. Russell and
I. Antal-Zimanyi, Bioorg. Med. Chem., 2004, 12, 507–521.
6 V. Klusa, Drugs Future, 1995, 20, 135–138.
7 R. G. Bretzel, C. C. Bollen, E. Maeser and K. F. Federlin, Am. J.
Kidney Dis., 1993, 21, 53–64.
8 R. W. Chapman, G. Danko and M. I. Siegels, Pharmacology,
1984, 29, 282–291.
9 A. K. Ogawa, C. A. Willoughby, R. Bergeron, K. P. Ellsworth,
W. M. Geissler, R. W. Myer, J. Yao, G. Harris and
K. T. Chapman, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 2003, 13, 3405–
3408.
structures of the products were conrmed from physical and
1
spectroscopic data (IR and H NMR) in comparison with the 10 Comprehensive Medicinal Chemistry, Ed. J. C. Emmet,
literature data.
Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1990, ch. 14.1, vol. 3.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2017
RSC Adv., 2017, 7, 3611–3616 | 3615