A.E. EVREN, S. DAWBAA, D. NUHA et al.
Journal of Molecular Structure 1241 (2021) 130692
7
.16 (s, 1H, Ar-H), 12.32 (brs, 1H, -NH). 13C-NMR (75 MHz, DMSO-
d , ppm) δ 11.57 (thiazole-CH ), 15.71 (thiadiazole-CH ), 18.50
7.41 (m, 1H, Ar-H), 7.45 – 7.51 (m, 2H, Ar-H), 7.84 (d, J = 7.62
Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 8.04 (d, J = 7.95 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 12.38 (brs, 1H, -
NH). 13C-NMR (75 MHz, DMSO-d6, ppm) δ 11.60 (thiazole-CH3),
18.94 (-CH3-C-S), 46.45 (H-C-S), 121.80, 122.43, 125.30, 126.97,
127.31, 135.38, 152.94, 156.35, 164.75, 169.26. For C14 H13N3OS3 cal-
culated: Elemental Analysis: %C, 50.12; %H, 3.91; %N, 12.53; found:
6
3
3
(
-CH -C-S), 46.44 (H-C-S),127.26, 135.30, 156.37, 162.48, 167.36,
3
169.21. For C10H12N OS calculated: Elemental Analysis: %C, 39.98;
4
3
%
H, 4.03; %N, 18.65; found: %C, 39.95; %H, 4.06; %N, 18.62. HRMS
(
m/z): [M+H]+ calculated 301.0246; found 301.0246.
%
C, 50.09; %H, 3.93; %N, 12.51. HRMS (m/z): [M+H]+ calculated
2
.1.8. N-(4-methylthiazol-2-yl)-2-((5-nitro-1H-benzimidazol-2-yl)
336.0294; found 336.0296. Solubility: practically insoluble in wa-
ter and anhydrous ethanol, soluble in hot ethanol, freely soluble in
DMSO.
thio)propanamide (3e)
m. p. 199–201 °C, yield 80 %, 1HNMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6,
ppm) δ 1.64 (d, J = 7.08 Hz, 3H, -CH -C-S), 2.33 (s, 3H, thiazole-
3
CH ), 4.88 (q, J = 7.11 Hz, 1H, H-C-S), 7.14 (s, 1H, Ar-H), 7.58
3
2.2. Antimicrobial activity
(
d, J = 8.85 Hz, 1H, Ar-H) 8.03 (dd, J = 2.28Hz, J = 6.57 Hz,
1
2
13
1
H, Ar-H), 8.29 (s, 1H, Ar-H). C-NMR (75 MHz, DMSO-d , ppm)
6
The antimicrobial activity of final compounds (3a-3i) com-
pounds was screened on eight bacterial and three fungal strains
according to the standard procedure of CLSI [26,27] as described
in the previous study [28]. The antibacterial activities of the syn-
thesized compounds were tested against Escherichia coli (ATCC
δ 11.57 (thiazole-CH ), 18.75 (-CH -C-S), 44.47 (H-C-S), 110.91,
3
3
114.10, 117.54, 127.14, 135.32, 142.14, 156.38, 156.92, 169.91. For
C14 H13N O S calculated: Elemental Analysis: %C, 46.27; %H, 3.61;
5
3 2
%
N, 19.27; found: %C, 46.25; %H, 3.64; %N, 19.29. HRMS (m/z):
[
M+H]+ calculated 364.0533; found 364.0534.
2
5922), Serratia marcescens (ATCC 8100), Klebsiella pneumoniae
(
ATCC 13883), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 27853), Enterococcus
2
.1.9. 2-((5-Methoxy-1H-benzimidazol-2-yl)thio)-N-(4-methylthiazol-
-yl)propanamide (3f)
faecalis (ATCC 2942), Bacillus subtilis (ATCC 6633), Staphylococcus
aureus (ATCC 29213), and Staphylococcus epidermidis (ATCC 12228).
Candida albicans (ATCC 24433), Candida krusei (ATCC 6258), and
Candida parapsilopsis (ATCC 22019) were used to test the antifun-
gal activity of the same compounds. Tetracycline (against bacte-
rial strains) and fluconazole (against candida strains) were used as
standard reference drugs.
2
m. p. 167–169 °C, yield 86 %, 1HNMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6,
ppm) δ 1.59 (d, J = 7.08 Hz, 3H, -CH -C-S), 2.33 (s, 3H, thiazole-
3
CH ), 3.77 (s, 3H, -OCH ), 4.68 (q, J = 7.02 Hz, 1H, H-C-S), 6.77 (dd,
3
3
J = 2.46Hz, J = 6.27 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 6.97 (s, 1H, Ar-H), 7.13 (s, 1H,
1
2
13
Ar-H), 7.35 (d, J = 8.73 Hz, 1H, Ar-H). C-NMR (75 MHz, DMSO-
d , ppm) δ 11.65 (thiazole-CH ), 18.78 (-CH -C-S), 44.85 (H-C-S),
6
3
3
5
5.91 (-OCH ), 97.36 (4 of benzimidazole), 111.23 (6 of benzimida-
3
2
.3. ADME parameters
zole), 115.52 (7 of benzimidazole), 126.85 (4 of thiazole), 135.28 (5
of thiazole), 148.07 (2 of benzimidazole), 155.89 (5 of benzimida-
zole), 157.01 (2 of thiazole), 170.23 (C=O). For C15H16 N O S cal-
The prediction of the physicochemical parameters of com-
4
2 2
pounds (3a-3i) was calculated using the SwissADME web-based
culated: Elemental Analysis: %C, 51.70; %H, 4.63; %N, 16.08; found:
program [29-31].
%
C, 51.73; %H, 4.60; %N, 16.11. HRMS (m/z): [M+H]+ calculated
349.0787; found 349.0794. Solubility: practically insoluble in wa-
2
.4. Docking study
ter and anhydrous ethanol, soluble in hot ethanol, freely soluble in
DMSO.
The crystal structure of the DNA gyrase enzyme was retrieved
from the Protein Data Bank server (PDB code: 5NPK). The protein
preparation process, ligand preparation process, grid generation,
docking, and visualization studies were worked on Schrodinger’s
Maestro molecular modeling package [32].
2
2
.1.10. 2-((5-Methyl-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)thio)-N-(4-methylthiazol-
-yl)propanamide (3g)
m. p. 100–102 °C, yield 78 %, 1HNMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6,
ppm) δ 1.48 (d, J = 7.02 Hz, 3H, -CH -C-S), 2.34 (s, 3H, thiazole-
3
The water molecules were removed from the crystal structure.
Ligands were set to the physiological pH (pH = 7.4± 1.0) at the pro-
tonation step. In molecular docking simulations: Glide/SP docking
protocols were applied for the prediction of topologies of 3f and 3i
at the allosteric pocket of the target structure [33], after the prepa-
ration steps, the molecules were docked to the allosteric pocket of
5NPK. The docking study was used here to predict the relationship
between structure and inhibition of DNA gyrase enzyme. After de-
termination of the best poses, strain energy calculation and rescor-
ing function [34] was performed for the ligands with more than
4 kcal/mol energy difference between the docked and free confor-
mations received to eliminate the calculation errors.
CH ), 3.55 (s, 3H, triazol-CH ), 4.27 (q, J = 6.99 Hz, 1H, H-C-S),
3
3
.15 (s, 1H, Ar-H), 8.62 (s, 1H, Ar-H), 12.20 (brs, 1H, -NH). 1 C-NMR
3
7
(
75 MHz, DMSO-d , ppm) δ 11.58 (thiazole-CH ), 18.17 (-CH -C-
6 3 3
S), 31.47 (triazol-CH ), 45.32 (H-C-S), 127.23, 135.44, 147.06, 147.15,
3
156.15, 169.50. For C10H13N OS calculated: Elemental Analysis: %C,
5 2
4
2.38; %H, 4.62; %N, 24.71; found: %C, 42.38; %H, 4.62; %N, 24.71.
HRMS (m/z): [M+H]+ calculated 284.0634; found 284.0637.
2
.1.11. 2-((1H-benzimidazol-2-yl)thio)-N-(4-methylthiazol-2-yl)
propanamide (3h)
m. p. 181–183 °C, yield 82 %, 1HNMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6,
ppm) δ 1.62 (d, J = 7.08 Hz, 3H, -CH -C-S), 2.33 (s, 3H, thiazole-
3
CH ), 4.82 (q, J = 7.08 Hz, 1H, H-C-S), 7.13 – 7.18 (m, 3H, Ar-H),
3
7
.45 – 7.48 (m, 2H, Ar-H), 12.60 (brs, 1H, -NH). 13C-NMR (75 MHz,
3. Results and discussion
DMSO-d , ppm) δ 11.57 (thiazole-CH ), 18.85 (-CH -C-S), 44.65
6
3
3
3
.1. Chemistry
(
H-C-S), 114.51, 122.20, 127.16, 135.33, 149.03, 156.35, 169.93. For
C14 H14 N OS calculated: Elemental Analysis: %C, 52.81; %H, 4.43;
4
2
The compounds 3a-3i were synthesized as summarized in
%N, 17.60; found: %C, 52.84; %H, 4.40; %N, 17.63. HRMS (m/z):
M+H]+ calculated 319.0682; found 319.0691.
Scheme 1. Initially, the 4-methylthiazole-2-amine (1) resulted
from the reaction of thiourea with 1-chloropropan-2-one. Then,
the obtained compound 1 was acylated to gain 2-chloro-N-(4-
methylthiazol-2-yl)propanamide (2). Lastly, the mercapto deriva-
tives and compound 2 were reacted in acetone to obtain N-(4-
methylthiazol-2-yl)propanamide derivatives as the core structure.
The structures of synthesized compounds (3a-3i) were confirmed
[
2
.1.12. 2-(Benzothiazol-2-ylthio)-N-(4-methylthiazol-2-yl)
propanamide (3i)
m. p. 194–196 °C, yield 82 %, 1HNMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6,
ppm) δ 1.67 (d, J = 7.05 Hz, 3H, -CH -C-S), 2.34 (s, 3H, thiazole-
3
CH ), 4.91 (q, J = 7.05 Hz, 1H, H-C-S), 7.16 (s, 1H, Ar-H), 7.36 –
3
3