1976
A. Marinetti et al.
LETTER
pure 1,3-diols. For instance, the pure cyclic sulfates 3 with there are no guidelines to predict the efficiency of these
R = Et, t-Bu, cyclohexyl, CH2Ph have already been pre- and analogous chiral ligands as a function of the R substit-
pared and applied to phosphetane syntheses.4c,d Further uent, a large number of tests is still required to establish
developments are in progress.
the potential of phosphetanes 1.
In order to get insight into the potential of ligands 1 in More detailed studies are in progress. Investigations will
asymmetric catalysis, we considered a few rhodium pro- be extended also to other fields of organometallic cataly-
moted hydrogenation reactions. Our first concern was in sis, where the specific properties of the ferrocene back-
fact to compare these phosphetane-based ligands with the bone should emerge.
analogous 1,1’-bis(phospholano)ferrocenes described in
ref. 5, which showed high catalytic activity and moderate
In summary, the first members of a new class of optically
pure phosphetanes have been prepared, characterised and
enantioselectivities in the hydrogenation of selected ole-
successfully tested in the enantioselective rhodium-catal-
fins and carbonyl groups. Thus, we performed the hydro-
ysed hydrogenations of model substrates.10 Studies are
genation of the same substrates under analogous
under way to optimise the synthetic approach and to find
conditions, by using a rhodium catalyst formed in situ
significant catalytic applications.
from (COD)2RhOTf and the chiral ligands 1a or 1b. The
results are given in Table 1.
References and Notes
(1) For recent reviews see: Ferrocenes. Togni, A. and Hayashi, T.
Eds, VCH, Weinheim 1995. Richards, C.J.; Locke, A.J.
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1998, 9, 2377.
(2) Selected examples: (a) Hayashi, T.; Yamamoto, A.; Hojo, M.;
Kishi, K.; Ito, Y., Nishioka, E.; Miura, H.; Yanagi, K. J.
Organomet. Chem. 1989, 370, 129. (b) Zhang, W.; Hirao, T.;
Ikeda, I. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 4545. (c) Kang, J.; Lee,
J.H.; Ahn, S.H.; Choi, J.S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 5523.
(d) Schwink, L.; Knochel, P. Chem. Eur. J. 1998, 4, 950.;
(e) Perea, J.J.A.; Lotz, M.; Knochel, P. Tetrahedron:
Asymmetry 1999, 10, 375. (f) Reetz, M.T.; Beuttenmüller,
E.W.; Goddard, R.; Pasto, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40,
4977.
(3) Selected examples : Maienza, F.; Wörle, M.; Steffanut, P.;
Mezzetti, A.; Spindler, F. Organometallics 1999, 18, 1041.
Nettekoven, U.; Kamer, P.C.J.; van Leeuwen, P.W.N.M.;
Widhalm, M.; Spek, A.L.; Lutz, M. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64,
3996. Brunner, H.; Janura, M. Synthesis 1998, 45.
(4) (a) Marinetti, A. Kruger, V.; Buzin, F.-X. Tetrahedron Lett.
1997, 38, 2947. (b) Marinetti, A.; Kruger, V.; Buzin, F.-X.
Coord. Chem. Rev. 1998, 178, 755. (c) Marinetti, A.; Genêt,
J.-P.; Jus, S.; Blanc, D.; Ratovelomanana-Vidal, V. Chem.
Eur. J. 1999, 5, 1160. (d) Marinetti, A.; Jus, S.; Genêt, J.-P.;
Ricard, L. Tetrahedron, in press.
Concerning the catalytic activity of these phosphetane-
rhodium catalysts, we have not yet any reliable informa-
tion, because quite long reaction times have been applied
to ensure total conversion.
(5) Burk, M.J.; Gross, M.F. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 35, 9363.
(6) (R,R)-2,4-pentanediol and (R,R)-2,6-dimethyl-3,5-
heptanediol were conveniently prepared by ruthenium-
BINAP catalysed hydrogenations (see ref. 4c and references
therein).
(7) Tetraethyl 1,1’-(ferrocenyl)bisphosphonite bis-borane
complex:1H NMR (CDCl3): d 1.30 (t, JH-H = 7.1 Hz, Me), 3.9-
4.2 (m, CH2), 4.62 (CH), 4.63 (CH) ppm.
(8) The experimental procedure previously applied to the
preparation of other phosphetane-borane complexes4c,d has
been used here for the synthesis of 2. (S,S)-2a, 1H NMR
(CDCl3): d 1.00 (dd, JH-P = 15.8 Hz, JH-H = 7.4 Hz, Me), 1.46
(dd, JH-P = 18.8 Hz, JH-H = 7.4 Hz, Me), 2.2-2.4 (m, 4H), 2.6-
2.7 (m, 2H), 2.7-2.9 (m, 2H), 4.5 (m, 2H, Cp), 4.6 (m, 2H, Cp),
4.7 (m, 4H, Cp); 13C NMR (CDCl3): d 15.8 (Me), 15.9 (Me),
28.0 (1JC-P = 42.3 Hz, PCH), 29.2 (1JC-P = 41.0 Hz, PCH), 35.9
(2JC-P = 16.1 Hz, CH2), 67.7 (JC-P = 38.3 Hz, PC), 72.0 (JC-
P = 3.2 Hz, CH), 74.0 (JC-P = 5.5 Hz, CH), 74.7 (JC-P = 7.5 Hz,
CH), 75.8 (JC-P = 13.3 Hz, CH); 31P NMR (CDCl3): d 49 ppm.
MS (DCI/NH3) m/e 432 (M+NH4). [a]D = -35 (c = 0.5,
CH2Cl2). Anal. Calcd. For C20H34B2P2Fe: C, 58.04; H, 8.28.
Found: C, 58.02; H, 8.29. (S,S)-2b, 1H NMR (C6D6): d 0.51
(dd, JH-H = 6.6 Hz, JH-P = 0.7 Hz, Me), 0.72 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, Me),
0.90 (dd, JH-H = 6.6 Hz, JH-P = 0.5 Hz, Me), 1.1 (m, 2H), 1.32
As shown in Table 1, the enantioselectivity levels are
highly dependent on the nature of the R-substituent on the
phosphetane rings, however they are at least comparable
(entry 6) and sometimes higher (entries 1 and 4) than
those obtained with the phospholane analogues. 5 Thus, it
appears that in the series of 1,1'-disubstituted ferrocenes,
chiral phosphetane moieties can perform better than the
corresponding phospholanes in the enantioselective rhod-
ium-catalysed hydrogenations. On the whole, the prelim-
inary results reported in Table 1 are very promising, when
considering that they were obtained under non-optimised
conditions.
Moreover, it must be emphasized that many, variously
substituted phosphetanes 1 should be accessible. Thus, it
is likely that a “matching ligand” could be found for each
substrate, which would optimise both the catalytic activity
and stereoselectivity in the hydrogenation reactions. As
Synlett 1999, No. 12, 1975–1977 ISSN 0936-5214 © Thieme Stuttgart · New York