TABLE 1. Cleavage of Biphenyls from Resin 7a-da
SCHEME 2. Suzuki Cross-Coupling of Resin-Bound
Bromophenylbismuthane 5 and Aryl Boronic Acidsa
a Reagents and conditions: (a) TFA/CH2Cl2 (1:1), rt, 1 h; (b) 2 equiv of
Br2, CH2Cl2, 60 °C,12 h; (c) 2 equiv of I2, THF, 60 °C, 12 h. b Isolated
yields of analytically pure biphenyls after purification by column chroma-
tography.
a Conversion of resin-bound bis(bromophenyl) bismuthane 5 to biphenyls
after 12 h was determined by standardized GC-MS after cleavage from
the resin by treatment with TFA/CH2Cl2 (1:1) at rt for 1 h. “Conversion”
represents the relative amounts of bromobenzene and biphenyls after
cleavage.
were obtained in isolated yields from 48% to 83% over two
steps (calculated from starting resin 5). Halo-debismuthylation
takes place through three repetitive cycles of oxidation of BiIII
by halogen to BiV and subsequent reductive elimination.16-19
lated resin-bound aryl Grignard reagent 4, affording the resin-
bound bismuthane 5 with a loading of 1.9 mmol/g (based on
Br).4
Traceless cleavage was performed using TFA/CH2Cl2 (1:1)
at room temperature and afforded the biphenyls in yields from
58% to 68% over two steps (Table 1, entries 1-4). The
mechanism of proto-debismuthylation is not known in detail
but is probably similar to that of proto-desilylation.20 In
comparison to resin-bound silicon, traceless cleavage from resin-
bound bismuth seems to give significantly higher yields.9 As
mentioned earlier, both aryl groups of the bismuth linker can
be utilized in product formation, resulting in a high resin
loading.21,22
Both, triarylbismuthanes and boronic acids, act as donors in
palladium-catalyzed cross-coupling reactions with arylbro-
mides.13,14 Therefore, a chemoselective cross-coupling reaction
with arylbromides in the presence of both, a triarylbismuthane
and a boronic acid, would be difficult or even impossible in
solution phase. However, immobilization of the bromophenyl
bismuthane on solid phase prevents the bismuthane from
coupling with the resin-bound aryl bromide.
Mild reaction conditions were required for the Suzuki
coupling reaction in order to suppress side reactions of the
immobilized bismuthane. Therefore, different solvents, pal-
ladium sources, ligands, and promoters were screened. With
tetrahydrofuran as solvent, with the combination of Pd2dba3 and
tri-tert-butylphosphane as catalyst, and with potassium fluoride
as promoter, satisfactory conversion was obtained at 40 °C
within 12 h (Scheme 2). It was found that the solid-phase
approach required larger amounts of palladium catalyst and
promoter than similar cross-coupling reactions in solution.15 We
also compared the performance of different boronic acid
derivatives. Phenyl boronic acid performed better (87% conver-
sion) than its 1,3-propanolate derivative (51% conversion),
whereas with potassium phenyl trifluoroborate no conversion
was observed.
Functionalized biphenyls of potential pharmaceutical interest
have been synthesized using a chemo-selective Suzuki cross-
coupling reaction followed by multidirectional or traceless
cleavage with bromine, iodine, or trifluoroacetic acid from resin-
bound bismuthanes. Substituted biphenyls were obtained in
moderate to good overall yields over two steps. To the best of
our knowledge this report is the first use of resin-bound bismuth
in SPOS and the first example of a solid-phase strategy for the
achievement of chemo-selective cross-coupling reactions. In
addition, halo- and proto-debismuthylation reactions have been
used for the first time as synthetically useful tools.23 We would
also like to emphasize that dimetalated arenes, such as the resin-
bound bismuth-palladium arene intermediate, have rarely been
reported in the literature.24
The biphenyls were cleaved by halo-debismuthylation from
the resin-bound bismuthanes by treatment with a solution of
iodine or bromine in tetrahydrofuran or dichloroethane, respec-
tively (Table 1, entries 5-12). The halogen-substituted biphenyls
(16) Challenger, F.; Allpress, C. F. J. Chem. Soc. 1915, 107, 16-25.
(17) Challenger, F.; Wilkinson, J. F. J. Chem. Soc. 1922, 121, 91-104.
(18) Beveridge, A. D.; Harris, G. S.; Inglis, F. J. Chem. Soc. A 1966, 5,
520-528.
(19) Challenger, F. J. Chem. Soc. 1914, 105, 2210-2218.
(20) Chan, T. H.; Fleming, I. Synthesis 1979, 79, 761-786.
(21) Plunkett, M. J.; Ellman, J. A. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 6006-6007.
(22) Chenera, B.; Finkelstein, J. A.; Veber, D. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1995, 117, 11999-12000.
(23) In an earlier report, Kauffmann and Steinseifer investigated the halo-
debismuthylation of alkyldiarylbismuthanes (in solution) as a synthetic tool.
In this case the approach failed because of unselective halo-debismuthylation
reactions. Kauffmann, T.; Steinseifer, F. Chem. Ber. 1985, 118, 1031-
1038.
(10) Matano, Y.; Miyamatsu, T.; Suzuki, H. Organometallics 1996, 15,
1951-1953.
(11) Matano, Y.; Begum, S. A.; Miyamatsu, T.; Suzuki, H. Organome-
tallics 1999, 18, 5668-5681.
(12) Ikegami, T.; Suzuki, H. Organometallics 1998, 17, 1013-1017.
(13) Rao, M. L. N.; Yamazaki, O.; Shimada, S.; Tanaka, T.; Suzuki, Y.;
Tanaka, M. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 4103-4105.
(14) Barton, D. H. R.; Ozbalik, N.; Ramesh, M. Tetrahedron 1988, 44,
5661-5668.
(15) Littke, A. F.; Dai, C.; Fu, G. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 4020-
4028.
(24) Shimada, S.; Yamazaki, O.; Tanaka, T.; Rao, M. L. N.; Suzuki, Y.;
Tanaka, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 1845-1848.
J. Org. Chem, Vol. 71, No. 3, 2006 1231