J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 5261-5262
5261
Scheme 1
The Dynamics of r-Anilino Carboxylate and
Related Cation Radical r-Heterolytic
Fragmentations
Zhuoyi Su, Daniel E. Falvey, Ung Chan Yoon,1 and
Patrick S. Mariano*
Table 1. Rate Constants for Decarboxylation and Retro-Aldol
Cleavage of Anilinium Radicals [p-X-C6H4NMeCHRE]•+
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry
UniVersity of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742
fragmentation rates
anilinium radical
k
dec (s-1)a or kra
ReceiVed NoVember 18, 1996
b,c
E
X
R
solvent
(M-1 s-1
)
R-Heterolytic fragmentation reactions of ion-radicals play a
major role in governing the chemoselectivities and efficiencies
of a wide variety of redox processes. The function of these
reactions (eqs 1 and 2) in SET-photochemistry is pivotal since
departure of an electrofugal or nucleofugal group from a
respective cation or anion radical often occurs in competition
with back electron transfer or alternative reaction modes. As a
result, knowledge about the dynamics of ion radical fragmenta-
tion reactions and their dependence on substrate structures and
redox potentials as well as the medium and additives is crucial
to the design of efficient SET-photochemical processes.
CO2NBu4
CO2NBu4
CO2NBu4
CO2NBu4 MeO
CO2NBu4 CF3
CO2NBu4
CO2NBu4
CH2OH
CH2OH
CH2OH
CH2OH
CH2OH
H
H
H
H
MeCN
EtOH
MeOH
MeCN
MeCN
1.7 ( 0.2 × 106
H
H
H
H
2.5 × 106
2.8 × 106
8.1 ( 0.3 × 105
1.2 ( 0.2 × 107
1.3 × 106
H
H
H
MeO
CF3
H
Me MeCN
Ph MeCN
H
H
H
Me 60% MeOH-MeCN
Ph 60% MeOH-MeCN
2.6 × 106
60% MeOH-MeCN
60% MeOH-MeCN
60% MeOH-MeCN
4.1 ( 0.6 × 104
2.0 ( 0.3 × 104
3.1 × 105
3.3 × 104
H
3.3 ( 0.7 × 105
a 25 °C. b 25 °C with nBuNOAc as base. c Errors were obtained by
evaluating data from 3-5 independent experiments.
To evaluate the dynamics of the aminium radical decarboxy-
lation and the related retro-aldol cleavage, we explored the SET-
photochemistry of precursors of these transients in order to
ensure that the respective fragmentation reaction pathways were
followed cleanly in these systems. Preparative irradiation (Pyrex
(λ > 300 nm N2, MeCN) of the anilinocarboxylate 1 (2.5 mM)
and DCB (2.5 mM) leads to clean production of a mixture the
diamine 3 (30%), adduct 4 (27%), and recovered DCB (55%)
(Scheme 1). Likewise, adduct 4 (32%) and recovered DCB
(63%) are produced when an MeCN solution containing the
anilino alcohol 2 (2.4 mM), DCB (2.4 mM) and tetra-n-
butylammonium acetate (TBAA) (0.3 M) is irradiated (Scheme
1). The results demonstrate that R-amino radical formation by
decarboxylation and retro-aldol cleavage is dominant for anilino
carboxylate and anilino alcohol cation radical decay.
Time-resolved laser spectroscopy was used to determine the
dynamics of these R-fragmentation reactions. Laser excitation
(308 nm, 6 ns, 50-60 mJ) of solutions containing (Table 1)
tetra-n-butylammonium anilino carboxylates (ANC, 0.5 mM)
and DCB (50 mM) in each case leads to initial generation
(Figure 1) of a 1:1 (known2h molar absorptivities) of two
transients characterized as DCB•- (340(s), 430(w) nm) and
ANC•+ (ca. 460 nm).2h,6 Analysis of the decay profiles for
ANC•+ employed a kinetic treatment which takes into account
competitive diffusion controlled2h SET between ANC•+ and
DCB•- and unimolecular decarboxylation of ANC•+. This
analysis when combined with the known2h,6 molar absorptivities
The importance of this information is evidenced by the
expanding number of investigations in which the rates of ion
radical reactions have been directly measured.2 Our initial
efforts2h in this area focused on the R-deprotonation reactions
of tertiary amine cation radicals and the related R-silylamine
cation radical desilylation process.3 We demonstrated that laser
flash irradiation of solutions containing 1,4-dicyanobenzene
(DCB) and N,N-dialkylanilines generates spectroscopically
detectable anilinium radicals which decay by (1) back electron
transfer with DCB•- at diffusion controlled rates, (2) base
induced R-deprotonation with second order rate constants that
are dependent on base strength and the nature of R- and arene
ring-substituents, or (3) silophile induced R-desilylation. Re-
cently, we initiated a more broad study of aminium radical
R-heterolytic fragmentation reactions in order to determine if
the trends noted earlier are general. Our plan was to determine
the rates of the known,3 but relatively unstudied,4 unimolecular
decarboxylation reactions of R-amino carboxylates (eq 3), to
compare these rates to the bimolecular rates of the related
deprotonation,2h desilylation,2h and retro-aldol fragmentation (eq
3),5,2b and, finally, to ascertain if substituent effects on the rates
of these aminium radical fragmentation can be generalized.
of the transients yields the unimolecular rate constants (kdec
)
for ANC•+ decarboxylation. Decarboxylation rates were mea-
sured for a series ring- and R-substituted systems and in aprotic
and protic solvents (Table 1). In addition, counter cation effects
on the rates of ANC•+ decarboxylation were evaluated. Rep-
resentative data for the metal cation type dependence of kdec
are given in Table 2.
(1) Department of Chemistry, College of Natural Science, Pusan National
University, Pusan 607-728, Korea.
(2) (a) Johnston, L. J.; Schepp, N. P. AdVances in Electron Transfer
Chemistry; Mariano, P. S., Ed.; JAI Press: Greenwich, CT, 1996; Vol. 5,
pp 41-102. (b) Lucia, L. A.; Burton, R. D.; Schanze, K. S. J. Phys. Chem.
1993, 97, 9078. Burton, R. D. Bartberger, M. D.; Zhang, Y.; Eyler, J. R.;
Schanze, K. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 0000. (c) Albini, A.; Fasani,
E.; Freccero, M. AdVances in Electron Transfer Chemistry; Mariano, P. S.,
Ed.; JAI Press: Greenwich, CT, 1996; Vol. 5, pp 103-140. Anne, A.;
Fraoua, S.; Hapiot, P.; Moiroux, J.; Saveant, J.-M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995,
117, 7412. (d) Anne, A.; Fraoua, S.; Moiroux, J.; Saveant, J.-M. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 3938. (e) Dinnocenzo, J. P.; Banach, T. E. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 8646. (f) Parker, V. D.; Tilset, M. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1991, 113, 8778. (g) Maslak, P.; Vallombroso, T. M.; Chapman, W.
H.; Narvaez, J. N. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1994, 33, 73 and references
therein. (h) Zhang, X.; Yeh, S.-R.; Hong, S.; Freccero, M.; Albini, A.;
Falvey, D. E.; Mariano, P. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1994, 116, 4211.
(3) Davidson, R. S.; Steiner, P. R. J. Chem. Soc. (C) 1971, 1682.
Davidson, R. S.; Harrison, K.; Steiner, P. R. J. Chem. Soc. (C) 1971, 3480.
(4) Photolysis of thiopyridyl esters of R-amino acids can also be used to
generate R-amino radicals, see: Barton, D. H. R.; Herve, Y.; Potier, P.;
Thierry, J. Tetrahedron 1987, 43, 4297.
(5) Davidson, R. S.; Orton, S. P. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1974,
209. For a review of more recent studies see Gaillard, E. R.; Whitten, D.
G. Acc. Chem. Res. 1996, 29, 292.
(6) Jones, G.; Malba, V. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1985, 119, 105. Robinson,
E. A.; Schulte-Frohlinde, D. J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 1 1973, 69,
707.
S0002-7863(96)03988-1 CCC: $14.00 © 1997 American Chemical Society