Table 3 Conversion and selectivity for the reaction of o-amino-
alcohols with CO2 in the presence of np-CeO2 as catalyst. Reaction
In conclusion, in the present work we describe that fixation
of CO2 by bidentate o-aminoalcohols can be carried out
using nanoparticulated ceria as catalyst. High conversions
with good selectivity towards oxazolidinone were achieved
for N-alkyl substituted aminoethanols. Our report is of inter-
est in the context of Green Chemistry trying to develop new
processes using CO2 as a C1 feedstock.
conditions: o-aminoalcohol
= 2 mmol, ethanol = 35 mmol,
CO2 = 7 bar, np-CeO2 = 75 mg, reaction temperature = 160 1C,
reaction time 6h.
Substrate
Conv. (%)
Sel. (%)
2-Aminoethanol
3-Aminopropanol
4-Aminobutanol
58
30
20
87
79
76
Financial support by the Spanish Ministry of Science and
Innovation (CTQ2009-11586) is gratefully acknowledged.
R. J. thanks the Spanish Ministry of Education for a scholarship.
2-amino-1-propanol is widely available by dehydration and
amination of glycerol.17 Glycerol is a by-product of biodiesel
and a surplus of glycerol is expected. Thus, there is a large
incentive in developing products derived from glycerol such as
4-methyloxazolidin-2-one that is an nitrogenated analog of
glycerol carbonate.
Notes and references
z Materials. g-Al2O3, P25 TiO2, MgO, CeO2 (40 nm average size),
non-nanoparticulated CeO2 (non-np-CeO2) and amino alcohols were
commercial samples (Aldrich). nanoparticulated CeO2 (np-CeO2) and
ZrO2 were prepared by hydrolysis in aqueous solution of the corres-
ponding soluble salts at controlled pH. as reported in the literature.8
Au/CeO2 was obtained from HAuCl4 by a deposition–precipitation
method as reported.16
Reaction procedure. Catalytic experiments were performed in
reinforced glass reactors equipped with temperature and pressure
controllers. For each reaction, the reactant mixtures were dissolved
in ethanol (35 mmol) and placed into the reactor (2 mL capacity)
together with the corresponding catalyst (75 mg). n-Decane was used
as internal standard to determine conversions and selectivity. The
reactors were sealed and deeply introduced into the silicone bath
preheated at the required temperature. The reactions were conducted
at autogeneous pressure. During the experiment, the magnetic stirring
rate was fixed at 1000 rpm. Aliquots were taken from the reactor at
different reaction times. Once the catalyst particles were removed from
the solution by centrifuging at 12 000 rpm, the products were analyzed
by GC-MS (Hewlett-Packard, 35 m capillary column of cross-linked
5% phenyl methylsilicone).
Finally, the influence of the ring size of the resulting cyclic
carbamate was studied by using as starting materials the
parent 2-aminoethanol, 3-aminopropanol and 4-aminobutanol
to give 1,3-oxazolidin-2-one, 1,3-oxazinan-2-one and
1,3-oxazepinan-2-one, respectively. Table 3 show the data
corresponding to the highest product yield. Further increase
in o-aminoalcohol conversion leads to a decrease in the
selectivity toward the cyclic carbamate.
Table 3 shows that as the size of the resulting ring increases,
the corresponding heterocycle becomes disfavoured. It is
interesting to note that for 2-aminoethanol and 3-aminopropanol,
formation of a secondary product corresponding to a dimeric
condensation was observed. Detection of this by-product
supports our previous claims about decomposition of the
cyclic carbamate under the reaction conditions (Scheme 3).
Apparently in the case of secondary ethanolamines shown in
Table 2, self-decomposition is disfavoured with respect to
primary amines for steric reasons and the corresponding
oxazolidinones are more stable. In any case, the data of
Table 3 are again remarkable in the context of related CO2
fixation reactions with yields between 50 and 15%.
1 M. Aresta and A. Dibenedetto, Dalton Trans., 2007, 2975–2992.
2 D. Y. Dong, L. P. Yang and W. H. Hu, Prog. Chem., 2009, 21,
1217–1228.
3 T. Sakakura and K. Kohno, Chem. Commun., 2009, 1312–1330.
4 K. M. K. Yu, I. Curcic, J. Gabriel and S. C. E. Tsang,
ChemSusChem, 2008, 1, 893–899.
5 T. Sakakura, J. C. Choi and H. Yasuda, Chem. Rev., 2007, 107,
2365–2387.
6 M. Aresta, A. Dibenedetto, C. Pastore, C. B. Corrado, A. B. Brunella,
S. Cometa and E. De Giglio, Catal. Today, 2008, 137, 125–131.
7 W. L. Dai, S. L. Luo, S. F. Yin and C. T. Au, Appl. Catal., A, 2009,
366, 2–12.
´
8 R. Juarez, A. Corma and H. Garcia, Green Chem., 2009, 11,
949–952.
9 D. J. Ager, I. Prakash and D. R. Schaad, Aldrichim. Acta, 1997, 30,
3–12.
10 M. E. Dyen and D. Swern, Chem. Rev., 1967, 67, 197–246.
11 T. A. Mukhtar and G. D. Wright, Chem. Rev., 2005, 105, 529–542.
12 X. L. Li, R. Wang, Y. P. Wang, H. Chen, Z. W. Li, C. L. Ba and
J. C. Zhang, Tetrahedron, 2008, 64, 9911–9920.
13 M. Vargas-Sanchez, S. Lakhdar, F. Couty and G. Evano, Org.
Lett., 2006, 8, 5501–5504.
The reaction mechanism leading to the formation of cyclic
carbamates and the differences among the ceria samples were
studied by IR spectroscopy (see ESIw). It was observed that
after CO2 chemisorption and evacuation at 160 1C (the reaction
temperature) using CH3OH as probe to characterize the active
sites, np-CeO2 is the only sample having acid sites able to form
CH3+, while commercial CeO2 (40 nm) or Au/np-CeO2
lack these sites. These acids sites are required to effect the
esterification of carbamic acid into the cyclic carbamate.
14 V. V. Vintonyak, M. Cala, F. Lay, B. Kunze, F. Sasse and
M. E. Maiera, Chem.–Eur. J., 2008, 14, 3709–3720.
15 A. Corma, P. Atienzar, H. Garcia and J.-Y. Chane-Ching,
Nat. Mater., 2004, 3, 394–397.
16 R. Juarez, P. Concepcion, V. Fornes, A. Corma and H. Garcia,
´ ´
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2010, 49, 1286–1290.
17 A. Corma, S. Iborra and A. Velty, Chem. Rev., 2007, 107,
2411–2502.
Scheme 3 Proposed mechanism of cyclic carbamate decomposition
and formation of dimeric diamines.
ꢀc
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2010
Chem. Commun., 2010, 46, 4181–4183 | 4183