Cytoplasmic Intermediates of Murein Biosynthesis
J. Am. Chem. Soc., Vol. 121, No. 6, 1999 1177
Results and Discussion
UDP-N-acetylmuramyl-L-alanyl-γ-D-glutamic Acid (5). Purified
3
was used as a starting material to synthesize 5. The reaction mixture
contained TAPS (50 mM, pH 8.0), ATP (600 mmol), MgCl (240
mmol), DTT (120 mmol), L-alanine (480 mmol), D-glutamic acid (600
mmol), and 3 (120 mmol). MBP fusion MurC (0.2 mg/ml) and MurD
2
Although cell wall precursors 3-7 will accumulate in bacteria
treated with specific inhibitors of the murein pathway, purifica-
tion of these compounds is inefficient and labor intensive.6
Chemical synthesis is not an easy route either, given the stereo-
chemical complexity of these intermediates, and only 1 and (the
(0.25 mg/ml) were added to initiate the reaction. The progress of the
reaction at 37 °C was followed by assaying for ADP activity as in the
case of 4. The reaction was complete within 5 h. The workup of the
reaction was carried out as in the case of 2 except that the MonoQ
anion-exchange column (10 × 10 cm, Pharmacia) was eluted with a
7
8
lysyl-containing version of) 7 have been prepared synthetically.
Although enzymatic syntheses and purifications of 2, 3, and 4
have been reported, the HPLC purification protocol limited the
4
nonlinear gradient from 0.02 to 1.0 M NH OAc, pH 9.0. The active
9
amount of material that could be processed. A larger scale,
fractions were pooled concentrated and lyophilized. The lyophilized
material was dissolved in 20 mL of water and 5 mL of it was applied
to the preequilibrated MonoQ column with a nonlinear gradient of
10
open-column chromatography method to purify 3 using trieth-
ylamine ammonium bicarbonate (TEAB) as solvent produced,
in our hands, a persistent contaminant of 317 amu (as revealed
0
4
.02-1M NH OAc pH 9.0 buffers. Fractions containing the product
1
1
were pooled and lyophilized. The lyophilized flocculent powder was
dissolved in water and lyophilized three times to remove ammonium
acetate. Finally, the residue was dissolved in water and stored at -80
by FAB mass spectral analysis). No high yield synthesis and
purification of 5, 6, or 7 by any method has been reported.
The drawbacks of literature protocols compelled us to devise
a generalized procedure for producing large quantities of each
cell wall precursor. Since recombinant Escherichia coli mur
genes can be overexpressed in soluble form in E. coli and
°
C. Product 5 (60 mg, 74%) was analyzed by FAB mass spectrom-
1
13
etry, HPLC, H and C NMR, and elemental analysis. MS (FD)
m/z 880.2 (100%, M + H); Anal. Calcd for C28 : C, 29.38;
43 5 23 2
H N O P
H, 6.43; N, 13.46; P, 5.41. Found: C, 29.38; H, 6.36; N, 13.05;
P, 5.13.
1
2
purified in gram quantities, enzymatic synthesis appeared to
be the most efficient way to proceed. In short, the target
compound was prepared by incubating 1 with the Mur enzyme-
(s) and their cosubstrates that preceded the target compound in
the metabolic sequence. Each intermediate could be produced
in turn, capitalizing on the in situ synthesis of the prior
UDP-N-Acetylmuramyl-L-alanyl-γ-D-glutamyl-m-diaminopimel-
ic Acid (6). To synthesize 6, purified 3 was used as a starting material.
The reaction mixture contained TAPS (50 mM, pH 8.0), ATP (225
2
mmol), MgCl (90 mmol), DTT (45 mmol), L-alanine (135 mmol),
D-glutamic acid (135 mmol), meso-diaminopimelic acid (135 mmol),
and 3 (22.5 mmol). MBP fusion MurC (0.2 mg/mL), MurD (0.25
mg /mL), and MurE (0.25 mg/mL) were added to initiate the reac-
tion. The progress of the reaction was followed by assaying for ADP
activity as in the case of 4 and 5. The reaction was complete within
13
intermediate. Thus, synthesis of 2 from 1 was straightforward
using MurA (Table 1). Developing a one-pot, two-enzyme
(MurA and MurB) synthesis of 3 from 1 to bypass the
purification of 2 was complicated by the sensitivity of MurB
5
h at 37 °C. The work up of the reaction was carried out as in case
of 2 except MonoQ anion-exchange column (10 × 10 cm Pharm-
acia) was eluted with a nonlinear gradient from 0.02 to 1 M NH OAc,
9
d
to substrate and product inhibition, which precluded the use
of high substrate concentration in the reaction. Using high
concentrations of MurB mitigated the substrate inhibition
problem but also revealed an intrinsic NADPH oxidase activity
4
pH 5.0. The active fractions were pooled, concentrated and lyophilized.
The lyophilized material was dissolved in 20 mL of water, and 5 mL
of it was applied to the preequilibrated MonoQ column with a nonlinear
gradient of 0.02-1.0 M NH
4
OAc, pH 9.0 buffers. Fractions containing
(6) (a) Flouret, B.; Mengin-Lecreulx, D.; van Heijenoort. J. Anal.
Biochem. 1981, 114, 59-63. (b) Kohlrausch, U.; Holtje, J. V. Fems.
Microbiol. Lett. 1991, 78, 253-258. (c) Allen, N. E.; Hobbs, J. N., Jr.;
Richardson, J. M.; Riggin, R. M. Fems. Microbiol. Lett. 1992, 98, 109-
product were pooled and lyophilized. The lyophilized flocculent powder
was dissolved in water and lyophilized three times to remove am-
monium acetate. Finally, the residue was dissolved in water and stored
at -80 °C. Product 6 (10.4 mg, 68%) was analyzed by FAB mass
1
16. (c) Michaud, C.; Blanot, D.; Flouret, B.; van Heijenoort, J. Eur. J.
Biochem. 1987, 166, 631-637. (d) Mizuno, Y.; Ito, E. J. Biol. Chem. 1968,
1
13
spectrometry, HPLC, and H and C NMR. MS (FD) m/z 1052.9
: C, 34.29; H, 6.49;
243, 2665-2672. (e) Anwar, R. Vlaovic, M. Biochem. Cell Biol. 1986, 64,
2
97-303.
54 7 26 2
(100%, M + H). Anal. Calcd for C35H N O P
(
7) Within eubacteria, the third position of the pentapeptide side chain
N, 13.71; P, 5.05. Found: C, 34.70; H, 6.29; N, 13.55; P, 4.65.
of 7 is the most variable. There is no easy formula to predict which amino
acid residue occurs in this position for a given bacterial species. Of the
more than nine different amino acid residues known to occupy this position,
the most common is meso-diaminopimelate (as in 7), which is probably
present in all Gram-negative bacteria. L-Lysine occurs frequently in the
MurNAc-pentapeptide of Gram-positive cocci. For a review, see: Schleifer,
K. H.; Kandler, O. Bacteriol. ReV. 1972, 36, 407-477.
UDP-N-Acetylmuramyl-L-alanyl-γ-D-glutamyl-m-diaminopime-
lyl-D-alanyl-D-alanine (7). To synthesize 7, purified 3 was used as a
starting material. The reaction mixture contained TAPS (50 mM, pH
8
2
.0), ATP (175 mmol), MgCl (70 mmol), DTT (35 mmol), L-alanine
(
(
105 mmol), D-glutamic acid (105 mmol), meso-diaminopimelic acid
105 mmol), D-alanine-D-alanine (105 mmol), and 3 (17.5 mmol). MBP
(8) (a) Heidlas, J. E.; Lees, W. L.; Pale, P. Whitesides, G. M. J. Org.
fusion MurC (0.2 mg/mL), MurD (0.25 mg/mL), MurE (0.25 mg/mL)
and MurF (0.25 mg/mL), were added to initiate the reaction. The
progress of the reaction was followed by assaying for ADP activity
as in the case of 4, 5, and 6. The reaction was complete within 5 h
at 37 °C. The workup of the reaction was carried out as in the case of
Chem. 1992, 57, 146-151. (b) Hitchcock, S. A.; Eid, C. N.; Aikins, J. A.;
Zia-Ebrahimi, M.; Blaszczak, L. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 1916-
1917.
(
9) (a) Falk, P. J.; Ervin, K. M.; Volk, K. S.; Ho, H. Biochemistry 1996,
3
5, 1417-1422. (b) Benson, T. E.; Marquardt, J. L.; Marquardt, A. C.;
Etzkorn, F. A.; Walsh, C. T. Biochemistry 1993, 32, 2024-2030. (c) Ho,
H. T.; Falk, P. J.; Ervin, K. M.; Krishnan, B. S.; Discotto, L. F.; Dougherty,
T. J.; Pucci, M. J. Biochemistry 1995, 34, 2464-2470. (d) Dhalla, A. M.;
Yanchunas, J., Jr.; Ho, H.-T.; Falk, P. J.; Villafranca, J. J.; Robertson, J.
G. Biochemistry 1995, 34, 5390-5402.
2
except that the MonoQ anion-exchange column (10 × 10 cm,
Pharmacia) was eluted with a nonlinear gradient from 0.02 to 1 M
NH OAc, pH 9.0. The active fractions were pooled, concentrated, and
4
lyophilized. The lyophilized material was dissolved in 20 mL of water,
and 5 mL of it was appilied to the pre-equilibrated MonoQ column
with a nonlinear gradient of 0.02-1.0 M NH OAc, pH 5.0 buffers.
4
(
10) Jin, H.; Emanuele, J. J., Jr.; Fairman, R.; Robertson, J. G.; Hail, M.
E.; Ho, H.-T.; Falk, P. J.; Villafranca, J. Biochemistry 1996, 35, 1423-1431.
11) Commercially available TEAB buffer and triethylamine base both
(
Fractions containing the product were pooled and lyophilized. The
lyophilized flocculent powder was dissolved in water and lyophilized
three times to remove ammonium acetate. Finally, the residue was
dissolved in water and stored at -80 °C. Product 7 (9.3 mg, 61%) was
contained a contaminant of the same mass. We suspect that this contaminant
is a product of light-activated polymerization of triethylamine that yields a
nonvolatile compound. Because of this problem, the TEAB solvent system
was not used to purify the murein substrates.
1
13
(12) Pryor, K. D.; Leiting, B. Protein Expression Purif. 1997, 10, 309-
19.
analyzed by FAB mass spectrometry, HPLC, and H and C NMR.
MS (FD) m/z 1194.4 (100%, M + H). Anal. Calcd for C41
C, 34.65; H, 6.81; N, 14.78; P, 4.36. Found: C, 34.81; H, 6.46; N,
4.52; P, 3.90.
3
64 9 28 2
H N O P :
(13) 1 is commercially available or it can be prepared: ref 8a or Leiting,
B.; Pryor, K. D.; Eveland, S. S.; Anderson, M. S. Anal. Biochem. 1998,
256, 185-191.
1