subsequent cyclizations to yield 2. Therefore, it is likely that the
(13bH)- and (17bH)-configurations in 6/6/5- and 6/6/6/5-ring
systems are required for the completion of two ring-expansion
processes to give 9. This hypothesis agrees well with the
previous results2a,b that only 6 and 8 were trapped when the
squalene analogues having a hydroxy group were incubated
with the native SHC, but that 6A and 8A were not. The secondary
cation 9 has been assumed as an intermediate in hopene
biosynthesis, but no experimental evidence has been given.
Formation of 14 and 15 gave definitive evidence for the
involvement of intermediate 9. The 1,2-shift of 28-Me to the
C17 cation could give 14 (path a in Scheme 2), whereas
rearrangement of the isoprenoid side chain to the cation could
afford 15 (path b). Triterpenes 14 and 15 have never been
reported before. We propose to denote the prohopane skeleton
for 9, prohopene A for 14 and prohopene B for 15. It is
noteworthy that 8A is the biosynthetic intermediate of some plant
triterpenes.1 A looser binding near the C/D-ring could also
perturb the correct positioning of the D21 double bond in 9, thus
leading to the accumulation of 14 and 15; the appropriate
arrangement of the double bond could allow a further
cyclization to give 10 through the nucleophilic attack of the
double bond toward cation 9. Product 16 could be formed
perhaps due to the erroneous positioning of the deprotonation
site for introducing the D22,29 double bond of 2, which may have
also occurred concomitantly with the local change near the C/D-
rings.
With respect to the mutated I261V SHC, no abortive
cyclization product was found and the kinetic data were almost
the same as that of the wild-type SHC,7 but the mutant I261A
gave a looser affinity and a slower velocity for hopene
biosynthesis.7 Site-directed mutagenesis not only helps to
understand the fundamental issue of the reaction mechanism
(molecular recognition and catalytic function), but also gen-
erates the previously unknown ‘unnatural’ natural products,8a
as represented by 14 and 15. The rational genetic engineering of
the active and/or recognition sites is a promising tool for the
creation of novel natural products.4a,8b
Fig. 1 Structures of the enzymatic products by the mutated I261A SHC.
and from 21-Me for C17. The proton chemical shift of 21-Me
was 0.919 ppm (J 6.7 Hz) in CDCl3, which allowed the
assignment of 20R-stereochemistry.6 The EIMS spectrum of 14
was essentially the same as that of 15. The 6/6/6/6-fused
tetracyclic skeletons of 14 and 15 were revealed by NMR
analyses. An HMBC correlation between 28-Me and C13 was
observed for 15, but not for 14. A strong NOE was observed
between H16 and H19 for 15, while no NOE was seen for 14.
Product 16 differed from 2 only in the double bond position,
which was determined by the HMBC cross peaks of 28-Me/
C17, 29-Me/C21 and 30-Me/C2l.
Tricyclic 11 could be produced via 6A and two tetracyclics 12
and 13, via 8A (Scheme 2). Proton elimination from 21-Me of 8A
could give 12, but a hydride shift to C18 of 8A followed by
deprotonation of the 13H could afford 13. Formation of tri- and
tetra-cyclic skeletons 11–13 may have occurred owing to the
local change, especially near the site(s) responsible for the C/D-
ring formation; the mutated SHC replaced by a smaller bulk size
of Ala could not perfectly fit with 1.7 Compounds 11–13 were
accumulated, while the corresponding epimers 11A and 12A from
6 and 8 were not detected. This suggests that 6A and 8A cannot
undergo further cyclizations, whereas the intermediates 6 and 8,
which had been produced by this mutated SHC, could undergo
This work was supported by a Grant-in-Aid to T. H. (No.
11660104) from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and
Culture, Japan.
Notes and references
1 I. Abe, M. Rohmer and G. D. Prestwich, Chem. Rev., 1993, 93, 2189.
2 (a) T. Sato, T. Abe and T. Hoshino, Chem. Commun., 1998, 2617; (b) T.
Hoshino, M. Kouda, T. Abe and S. Ohashi, Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem.,
1999, 63, 2038.
3 T. Sato and T. Hoshino, Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem., 1999, 63, 2189.
4 (a) T. Hoshino and T. Sato, Chem. Commun., 1999, 2205; (b) T.
Merkofer, C. Pale-Grosdemange, M. Rohmer and K. Poralla, Tetra-
hedron Lett., 1999, 40, 2121; (c) C. Pale-Grosdemange, T. Merkofer, M.
Rohmer and K. Poralla, Tetrahedron Lett., 1999, 40, 6009.
5 For 11; K. Masuda, K. Shiojima and H. Ageta, Chem. Pharm. Bull., 1989,
34, 1140; for 12; H. Yamashita, K. Masuda, T. Kobayashi, H. Ageta and
K. Shiojima, Phytochemistry, 1998, 49, 2461; for 13; Y. Arai, K. Masuda
and H. Ageta, Chem. Pharm. Bull., 1982, 30, 4219; for 16, H. Ageta, K.
Shiojima and Y. Arai, Chem. Pharm. Bull., 1987, 35, 2705.
6 I. Abe and M. Rohmer, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans 1, 1994, 783.
7 Optimum catalysis was found at 55 °C for the mutants I261A, but at 60
°C for the wild-type and I261V. Kinetic values of Km and Vmax were
determined at 55 °C and pH 6.0 from Lineweaver–Burk plots as follows;
Km: 25.8, 34.7 and 178 mM; Vmax: 3.87, 3.57 and 0.43 nmol min21 mg21
,
respectively, for the wild-type, I261V, and I261A. The I261G mutant,
having the smallest size, also produced 11–13 in twice the quantity than
I261A, despite the cyclase activity being significantly decreased (the
amount of 2 was 17% of that of I261A), which further supports the
importance of a bulk size at 261 position for the stereoselective
cyclization reactions.
8 (a) Examples of ‘unnatural’ natural products by altering the active sites
of sesquiterpenes or polyketide synthases. D. E. Cane and Q. Xue, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 1996, 118, 1563; R. McDaniel, A. Thamchaipenet, C.
Gustafsson, H. Fu, M. Betlach, M. Betlach and G. Ashley, Proc. Natl.
Acad. Sci., USA, 1999, 96, 1846; (b) C. A. Roessner and A. I. Scott,
Chem. Biol., 1996, 3, 325.
Scheme 2
Communication b000711k
442
Chem. Commun., 2000, 441–442