X. Shang et al. / Journal of Molecular Structure 1010 (2012) 52–58
57
Fig. 6. Molecular orbital level of compound 1 and 2, (a) HOMO; (b) LUMO.
(7.84 ppm) slowly shifted to the upfield when the anion concentra-
tion was less than 1 equiv. With the further addition of anion, the
signals of Ha, Hb and Hc exhibited significant upfield shift. The
as a red shift in the UV–vis spectrum. In particular, a tautomeric
equilibrium occurred during the anion recognition process. The dif-
ferent electronic properties of the tautomer are responsible for the
observed color and spectral changes. While, compound 2 contain-
above results observed likely indicated the H2POÀ ion exhibited a
4
hydrogen-bonding interaction with 2. Thus, the results of 1H
ing two –Br groups at the ortho and para positions can bind H2POÀ
4
NMR titration also corroborated the above supposition of the inter-
ion in the form of phenol and the anion binding ability is stronger
than compound 1, exiting in the form of tautomerization, phenol-
hydrazone, in recognition process.
actions between the host and H2POÀ ion. The possible binding
4
mode in the solution was shown in Scheme 3.
Acknowledgment
4. Theory
This work was supported by the Nature Science Fund of Henan
Province (2010B150024, 112300410104), Young Teacher Fund of
Henan Province and Doctorial Starting Fund of Xinxiang Medical
University.
The geometries of compound 1 and its tautomer were optimized
(Fig. 5) using Density functional theory at B3LYP/3-21G level with
Gaussian03 program [43]. The calculation results on total energy
and the energy gap of ELUMO, EHOMO of 1 and its tautomer were listed
in Table 2. From Table 2, one can see that (1) the total energy of com-
pound 1 is higher than that of its tautomer by 80.26 kJ molÀ1; (2) the
References
energy gap DE(ELUMO–EHOMO) of compound 1 is larger than that of its
[1] D.A. Jose, P. Kar, D. Koley, B. Ganguly, Inorg. Chem. 46 (2007) 5576.
[2] R. Velu, V.T. Ramakrishnan, P. Ramamurthy, J. Photoch. Photobiolo. A: Chem.
217 (2011) 313.
[3] S.-H. Kim, I.-J. Hwang, S.-Y. Gwon, S.M. Burkinshaw, Y.-A. Son, Dyes Pigments
88 (2011) 84.
[4] W. Yang, Z. Yin, Z. Li, J. He, J.-P. Cheng, J. Mol. Struct. 889 (2008) 279.
[5] J.L. Sessler, D.G. Cho, V. Lynch, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128 (2006) 16518.
[6] J. Shao, X. Yu, X. Xu, H. Lin, Z. Cai, H.K. Lin, Talanta 79 (2009) 547.
[7] Z. Yang, K. Zhang, F. Gong, S. Li, J. Chen, J.S. Ma, L.N. Sobenina, A.I. Mikhaleva,
B.A. Trofimov, G. Yang, J. Photochem. Photobiolo. A: Chem. 217 (2011) 29.
[8] F. Sancenon, R. Martinez-Manez, M.A. Miranda, M.J. Segui, J. Soto, Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed. 4 (2003) 647.
[9] C.R. Bondy, S.J. Loeb, Coord. Chem. Rev. 240 (2003) 77.
[10] P.A. Gale, Coord. Chem. Rev. 240 (2003) 191.
[11] J. Shao, H. Lin, H.K. Lin, Dyes Pigments 80 (2009) 259.
[12] K. Shin-ichi, Tetrahedron Lett. 43 (2002) 7059.
[13] J.M. Tomich, D. Wallace, K. Henderson, K.E. Mitchell, G. Radke, T. Brandt, C.A.
Amber, A. Scott, J. Ganthan, L. Sullivan, T. Iwamoto, Biophys. J. 74 (1998) 256.
[14] P.A. Furman, J.A. Fyfe, M.H. Clair St, K. Weinhold, J.L. Rideout, G.A. Freeman,
et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 83 (1986) 8333.
[15] V. Král, J.L. Sessler, Tetrahedron 51 (1995) 539.
[16] A. Ojida, Y. Mito-oka, K. Sada, I. Hamachi, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126 (2004) 2454.
[17] P.A. Gale, Chem. Commun. 30 (2005) 3761.
[18] G.W. Lee, N. Singh, D.O. Jang, Tetrahedron Lett. 49 (2008) 1952.
[19] J. Shao, H. Lin, X.F. Shang, H.M. Chen, H.K. Lin, J. Inclusion Phenom., Macrocycl.,
Chem. 59 (2007) 371.
[20] J.L. Jimenez Blanco, P. Bootello, J.M. Benito, C. Ortiz Mellet, J.M. Garcia
Fernandez, J. Org. Chem. 71 (2006) 5136.
[21] D.A. Jose, S. Mishra, A. Ghosh, A. Shrivastav, S.K. Mishra, A. Das, Org. Lett. 9
(2007) 1979.
[22] T. Gunnlaugsson, M. Glynn, G.M. Tocci, P.E. Kruger, F.M. Pfeffer, Coord. Chem.
Rev. 250 (2006) 3094.
tautomer. The above results imply the tautomer of 1 (keto-hydra-
zone) is more stable than compound 1 in solid. Compound 1
(keto-hydrazone) converts to the tautomer (phenol-hydrazone),
which participates the anion recognition process in the solution.
In addition, selected frontier orbitals for compounds are shown
in Fig. 6. We introduced molecular frontier orbital in order to ex-
plain UV–vis absorption spectra in host–guest interacted process
by electron transition of frontier orbital. The highest HOMO den-
sity and the highest LUMO density in compound 1 are both local-
ized on the whole molecule, only the electron cloud density in
one benzene ring of HOMO is less than LUMO. This demonstrates
it is the electron transition of the highest HOMO to arouse the
red shift phenomenon in UV–vis spectra of 1-anion. In the case
of compound 2, the highest HOMO density is localized on one ben-
zene ring and hydrazine, while, the highest LUMO density is local-
ized on the whole molecule. Therefore, the result is as well as
compound 1: it is the electron transition of the highest HOMO to
induce the red shift phenomenon in UV–vis spectra of 2-anion.
On the whole, the electron cloud density of compound 1 is stronger
than that of compound 2, which qualitative suggests the anion
binding ability of the former containing –NO2 is weaker than that
of the latter containing -Br. This theoretical result is constituent
with the previous text in affinity constant.
[23] M. Zhang, M.Y. Li, F.Y. Li, Y.F. Cheng, J.P. Zhang, T. Yi, C. Huang, Dyes Pigments
76 (2008) 408.
5. Conclusions
[24] V. Amendola, D. Esteban-Gomez, L. Fabbrizzi, M. Licchelli, Acc. Chem. Res. 39
(2006) 343.
In summary, the presence of anions such as H2POÀ gave birth to
4
changes in the color of solution of 1 from yellow to orange, as well
[25] J. Shao, H. Lin, M. Yu, Z.S. Cai, H.K. Lin, Talanta 75 (2008) 551.