SCHEME 1
Regioselective Synthesis of r-Methyl
2-Methyleneglutarate via a Novel
Lactonization-Elimination Rearrangement
David M. Bartley and James K. Coward*
Departments of Medicinal Chemistry and Chemistry, UniVersity
of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1055
ReceiVed September 2, 2005
A facile route to the R-methyl ester of 2-methyleneglutarate
via a three-step sequence from 3-hydroxymethylcyclopentene
is described. Regioselective formation of the monoacid from
a diester precursor proceeds via a novel fluoride-mediated,
tandem deprotection/rearrangement of O-silyl 2-(hydroxy-
methyl)dimethylglutarate.
carbinol, 4, as a glutarate surrogate leading to (2R)-2-(hydroxy-
methyl)glutaric acid, 3, was investigated
Racemic 4 (rac-4) and its sulfonate esters have been
investigated as precursors of delocalized carbonium ions, leading
to rearranged products on solvolysis.11 These authors reported
a multistep, low-yielding synthesis of rac-4, which has been
used by at least one other group but with no yields given.12 To
synthesize pseudopeptide 1 with the desired stereochemistry
(2S,2′S), a stereospecific synthesis of 3 was required which, in
turn, required a substituted cyclopentene precursor, e.g., 4, of
high stereochemical purity. The enantiomer of 4, (3R)-3-
(hydroxymethyl)cyclopentene (ent-4), has been described by
Maeda and Inouye.13 Thus, ent-4 was obtained from ethyl (2-
oxo)cyclopentane carboxylate via an enzyme-catalyzed dynamic
kinetic resolution to yield the (2R)-2-hydroxy ester, followed
by xanthate formation, pyrolytic elimination to form the cyclic
olefin, and finally reduction of the carboxylic acid ester to yield
ent-4. This compound is readily synthesized in high yield and
in large quantities if desired (see the Supporting Information
for details). To investigate the synthetic method outlined in
Scheme 1, ent-4, which is much more readily accessible than
4,9 was used in the research described in this paper.
Acrylic acids and acrylate esters substituted at C-2 are
synthetically useful intermediates, particularly in the synthesis
of natural products,1-3 pseudopeptides,4-6 and polymers.7 Our
interest in the design of phosphorus-containing pseudopeptides
as inhibitors of ATP-dependent ligases8,9 and Zn proteases10
has led us to develop new routes to both the R- and γ-monoesters
of 2-methyleneglutaric acid. As shown in Scheme 1, retrosyn-
thetic analysis suggested that the desired pseudopeptide, 1, could
possibly be obtained by either of two routes. These included
the stereoselective conjugate addition of a nucleophilic orga-
nophosphorus synthon to the differentially protected R-meth-
yleneglutarate, 2, bearing a chiral auxiliary (e.g., Evans’
oxazolidinone).5 In our hands, the diastereoselectivity of this
reaction was modest,9 so the possible use of ∆2-cyclopentenyl-
Protection of the alcohol as the O-silyl ether followed by
oxidative ring opening and concomitant methyl esterification
with the method of Marshall and Garafalo14 provided a mixture
of mono- and diesters. Following treatment with TMSCHN2,
diester 7 was obtained in 70% yield (Scheme 2). At this point,
the strategy was to remove the silyl ether (7 f 3) in order to
incorporate various phosphorus functionalities, which would be
converted to a nucleophilic reagent (PIII species, phosphorus
anion, phosphorus radical) for construction of the second P-C
bond required in the synthesis of 1. To our surprise, treatment
of 7 with TBAF resulted in a novel deprotection-rearrangement
reaction to give 5 in 84% yield.
* Address correspondence to this author. Phone: 734-936-2843. Fax: 734-
647-4865.
(1) Wolinsky, J.; Novak, R.; Vasileff, R. J. Org. Chem. 1964, 29, 3596-
3598.
(2) Wender, P. A.; Schaus, J. M.; White, A. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980,
102, 6159-6161.
(3) Nicolaou, K. C.; Gray, D. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 761-
763.
(4) Jackson, P. F.; Tays, K. L.; Maclin, K. M.; Ko, Y.; Li, W.; Vitharana,
D.; Tsukamoto, T.; Stoermer, D.; Lu, X. M.; Wozniak, K.; Slusher, B. S.
J. Med. Chem. 2001, 44, 4170-4175.
(5) Liu, X.; Hu, E.; Tian, X.; Mazur, A.; Ebetino, F. H. J. Organomet.
Chem. 2002, 646, 212-222.
(6) Yiotakis, A.; Georgiadis, D.; Matziari, M.; Makaritis, A.; Dive, V.
Curr. Org. Chem. 2004, 8, 1135-1158.
(7) Hatada, K.; Kitayama, T.; Ute, K. Prog. Polym. Sci. 1988, 13, 189-
276.
(11) Hanack, M.; Schneider, H. J. Tetrahedron 1964, 20, 1863-1879.
(12) Colombini, M.; Crotti, P.; Di Bussolo, V.; Favero, L.; Gardelli, C.;
Macchia, F.; Pineschi, M. Tetrahedron 1995, 51, 8089-8112.
(13) Maeda, K.; Inouye, Y. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1994, 67, 2880.
(14) Marshall, J. A.; Garofalo, A. W. J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 3675-
3680.
(8) Valiaeva, N.; Bartley, D.; Konno, T.; Coward, J. K. J. Org. Chem.
2001, 66, 5146-5154.
(9) Bartley, D. M.; Coward, J. K. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 6757-6774.
(10) Tsukamoto, T.; Flannery, J.; Rojas, C.; Slusher, B. S.; Valiaeva,
N.; Coward, J. K. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2002, 12, 2189-2192.
10.1021/jo051854a CCC: $33.50 © 2006 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 11/25/2005
372
J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 372-374