Chemistry Letters Vol.33, No.3 (2004)
291
12 h (Figure 2a). The widths of nanowires range from 20 to
200 nm and the length is more than 10 mm. Aspect ratio of nano-
wires exceeding 1000 is dominant in our samples. Moreover,
these nanowires are slightly transparent in the TEM images,
which indicates the thickness of nanowires is less than the width
(ratio of width and thickness is about 5). The nanowires are all
straight and flat which shows the stiffness characteristic of nano-
wires and indicates the promising application in the inorganic–
organic hybrid composites as a strengthening phase. This mor-
phology of strontium carbonate is distinct from the previous re-
port in which the nanowires are curved and assembled by some
tiny particles.5 Figure 2b shows the TEM image of sample syn-
thesized at 180 ꢂC. Comparing these two samples, the morphol-
ogy and size of products have no obvious difference when the
reaction temperature elevates. But at lower temperature (for ex-
ample 130 ꢂC), dendritic nanocrystals other than nanowires
formed as shown in Figure 2c. The width of trunk is 80 nm,
and the branch’s width is as small as 20 nm. Figure 2d is the typi-
cal morphology of strontianite dendritic crystal. SAED analysis
shows the different orientations of trunk and branches (inset in
Figure 2d), where trunk is along the [1-1-2] orientation and
branches are along the [11-2] orientation.
Figure 4. TEM image of barium carbonate nanowires, inset is
SAED pattern along [010] zone axis and (b) its corresponding
HR-TEM image.
peaks including (002), (004), and (006) are dramatically
strengthened, which corroborate the SAED and HRTEM results.
The exact growth mechanism of the nanowires is not fully
understood. We think the AET molecules added should play
an important role. Control experiments were performed with
no AET molecules while maintaining other condition. The re-
sultant strontium carbonate or barium carbonate is irregular ag-
glomerates rather than nanowires (not show here). The thiol and
amine groups in the organic molecule are always used to bind
metal cation to form complexes. Thus, directed adsorption of
AET molecules on the specified planes is reasonably proposed
to account for the anisotropic growth phenomena. Morphology
evolution from dendritic nanostructure to nanowire also should
be due to the different adsorption ability on different planes at
varied temperatures that results in the change in the growth rate
of different planes. It is interesting that the strontium carbonate
nanowires grow along a axis instead of c axis which was the
preferential orientation of barium carbonate nanowires although
these two materials have the same crystal structure. In order to
explore in depth the formation mechanism of carbonate nano-
wires and dendritic nanostructures, further studies are now in
progress in our laboratory.
Figure 3. (a) TEM image of single strontium carbonate nanowire
obtained at 160 ꢂC for 12 h, inset is SAED pattern along [001] zone
axis and (b) its corresponding HR-TEM image.
In conclusion, we herein introduce a novel method to syn-
thesize the high aspect ratio (more than 1000) strontium carbo-
nate nanowires with a axis orientation. Dendritic nanostructures
were also controllably formed at low temperatures. Moreover,
this method is feasible to be applied in the synthesis of barium
carbonate nanowires. The formation mechanism of resultant
morphology is proposed by directed adsorption of AET mole-
cule on specific crystal planes.
The strontianite nanowires’ growth habit seems to be differ-
ent from the dendritic nanostructure. The SAED pattern inserted
in Figure 3a is taken along the [001] zone axis, which illustrates
that the nanowires prefer to grow along the [100] orientation.
This anisotropic growth is well consistent with the XRD result
that peak of (200) plane largely enhanced when comparing with
the standard XRD spectrum. High resolution TEM image is also
presented here and clearly show that the (100) plane (interplanar
spacing is 0.52 nm) is the preferential growth plane (Figure 3b).
This orientation also is different from the strontium carbonate re-
ported whose preferential orientation is along c axis.5
We acknowledge Meiling Ruan for her guidance and help
with the TEM work.
The formation of carbonate process is proposed by follow-
ing equations that are often used to fabricate methane gas:
References
1
H. S. Nalwa, in ‘‘Nanostructured Materials and Nanotechnology,’’ ed. by
H. S. Nalwa, Academic Press, California (2000).
CH3COOꢃ þ OHꢃ ! CO32ꢃ þ CH4
ð1Þ
ð2Þ
2
a) J. Hu, T. W. Odom, and C. M. Lieber, Acc. Chem. Res., 32, 435
(1999). b) P. M. Ajayan, Chem. Rev., 99, 1787 (1999). c) Y. N. Xia,
P. D. Yang, Y. G. Sun, Y. Y. Wu, B. Mayers, B. Gates, Y. D. Yin,
F. Kim, and H. Q. Yan, Adv. Mater., 15, 353 (2003). d) C. N. R. Rao,
F. L. Deepak, G. Gundiah, and A. Govindaraj, Prog. Solid State Chem.,
31, 5 (2003).
Sr2þ þ CO23ꢃ ! SrCO3
Using this simple method, the barium carbonate nanowires
can also be synthesized. TEM image illustrates ultra-long nano-
wires as same as strontium carbonate nanowires were obtained.
The average width is about 320 nm and length is mostly longer
than 10 mm. SAED analysis indicates the nanowires preferential-
ly grow along the [001] orientation, which is consistent with the
previous reports.6b,6d HR-TEM image taken at the tip of nano-
wire further confirms the anisotropic growth (Figure 4b). The
crystal plane (001) whose lattice spacing is 0.63 nm is perpendic-
ular to the growth direction. In the XRD spectrum (Figure 1b),
3
4
Y. Xia and P. Yang, Adv. Mater., 15, 351 (2003).
C. M. Chan, J. S. Wu, J. X. Li, and Y. K. Cheung, Polymer, 43, 2981
(2002).
L. Wang and Y. Zhu, Chem. Lett., 32, 594 (2003).
a) D. Rautaray, S. R. Sainkar, and M. Sastry, Langmuir, 19, 888 (2003).
b) L. Qi, J. Ma, H. Cheng, and Z. Zhao, J. Phys. Chem. B, 101, 3460
(1997). c) D. Kuang, A. Xu, Y. Fang, H. Ou, and H. Liu, J. Cryst.
Growth, 244, 379 (2002). d) N. Zheng, Q. Wu, Y. Ding, and Y. Li,
Chem. Lett., 2000, 638.
5
6
Published on the web (Advance View) February 9, 2004; DOI 10.1246/cl.2004.290