Table 1. Antiproliferative activity of xylo-C-nucleoside 7.
IC50 (µM)a
Capan-1
Hap-1
HCT-116
NCI-H460
DND-41
HL-60
K-562
Z-138
Compound 7
Docetaxel
2.7±1.0
9.3±4.2
8.4±0.8
2.0±0.1
2.8±0.4
1.9±0.1
4.3±2.3
4.0±3.7
0.019±0.014
0.048±0.002
0.018±0.009
0.039±0.017
0.004±0.0004
0.037±0.016
0.007±0.004
0.024±0.002
0.014±0.009
0.023±0.014
0.047±0.005
0.019±0.009
0.016±0.0004
0.083±0.013
0.009±0.0006
0.018±0.010
Staurosporine
aIC50 indicates the half maximal inhibitory concentration.
It has been reported that the Birch reduction can also be used for
pancreatic adenocarcinoma (Capan-1), Hap-1 (chronic myeloid
leukemia), colorectal carcinoma (HCT-116), lung carcinoma
(NCI-H460), DND-41 (acute lymphoblastic leukemia), HL-60
(acute myeloid leukemia), K-562 (chronic myeloid leukemia),
and Z-138 (non-Hodgkin lymphoma). The inhibition of cell
proliferation induced by the tested compounds was calculated as
IC50, which is the half maximal inhibitory concentration. The IC50
was calculated by interpolation based on the semi-log dose
response. Compound 7 displayed antiproliferative activity against
23,24
the cleavage of benzyl groups.
sodium in liquid NH led only to the decomposition of the
starting material. Nonetheless, deprotected C-nucleosides 7 and
α could be obtained in a pleasing 80% overall yield by using
Pd(OH) on carbon (Pearlman’s catalyst) and cyclohexene as
hydrogen donor under reflux (Scheme 2).
However, treatment of 14 with
3
7
2
2
5,26
The two epimers
were separated by silica chromatography and target xylo-C-
nucleoside 7 was eventually isolated in 62% yield.
all above cell lines (Table 1), in particular exhibiting an IC50
=
The structures of compound 7 and its epimer 7α were
determined by NOESY NMR experiments. The main difference
between the two epimers is the direction of the nucleobase,
which is pointed upward and downward in 7 and 7α,
respectively, therefore resulting in different H,H-correlations. As
shown in Figure 5 (spectrum on the left), correlations between 8-
H and 2’-H as well as 1’-H and 4’-H were observed, which
provided the evidences needed for the characterization of
compound 7 as the β anomer. The existence of a NOESY
correlation between 1’-H and 5’-H (Figure 5, spectrum on the
right) together with the absence of any correlation between 8-H
and other protons further confirmed the configuration of 7α.
1.9 and 2.0 µM against HL-60 and NCI-H460 cells, respectively.
In contrast, no significant cytotoxicity was observed for 1’-
cyano-xylo-C-nucleoside 8.
In summary, a synthetic route was developed for the
preparation of novel xylo-C-nucleosides 7 and 8 featuring a
pyrrolo[2,1-f][1,2,4]triazin-4-amine base. Suitable reaction
conditions were established to accomplish a key debenzylation
step in the synthetic route. Furthermore, 2D NMR experiments
were performed to analyze the structures of the different C-
nucleoside epimers formed upon removal of the benzyl
functionalities. Both xylo-C-nucleosides 7 and 8 were evaluated
against different tumor cell lines. The results of this screening
Next, a cyano group was introduced at the 1’-position of
compound 12 upon reaction with TMSCN in the presence of
revealed that compound
7
possessed
a
micromolar
antiproliferative activity against a variety of tumor cells such as
HL-60 and NCI-H460, while compound 8 displayed no
significant cytotoxicity.
27
TMSOTf as promotor to provide nitrile compound 16 in 80%
yield (Scheme 3). Replacement of the thiomethyl group with an
amino functionality at the 4-position of 16 led to compound 17,
which then underwent removal of the benzyl protecting groups
Acknowledgments
by using BCl in DCM to afford a mixture of 8 and 8α (α:β = 2:1)
3
in an overall 45% yield. Benzyl deprotection by palladium
mediated hydrogenolysis was disappointing in this case, leading
to compounds 8 and 8α in poor yield. C-Nucleoside 8 was
isolated by silica chromatography in 15% and then further
purified by reverse phase HPLC chromatography.
P.N. would like to thank the China Scholarship Council (CSC)
for funding (grant No. 201506200062). We are grateful to Prof.
Jef Rozenski for recording HRMS spectra, Luc Baudemprez for
running the 2D NMR experiments, and Leentje Persoons for
excellent technical assistance.
References and notes
(
(
(
(
1) Darnall, K.; Townsend, L. B.; Robins, R. K. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S.
A. 1967, 57, 548.
2) Robins, R. K.; Townsend, L. B.; Cassidy, F.; Gerster, J. F.; Lewis, A. F.;
Miller, R. L. J. Heterocycl. Chem. 1966, 3, 110.
3) Gutowski, G. E.; Chaney, M. O.; Jones, N. D.; Hamill, R. L.; Davis, F.
A.; Miller, R. D. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1973, 51, 312.
4) Sweeney, M. J.; Davis, F. A.; Gutowski, G. E.; Hamill, R. L.; Hoffman,
D. H.; Poore, G. A. Cancer Res. 1973, 33, 2619.
(
(
5) Patil, S. A.; Otter, B. A.; Klein, R. S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 35, 5339.
6) Warren, T. K.; Jordan, R.; Lo, M. K.; Ray, A. S.; Mackman, R. L.;
Soloveva, V.; Siegel, D.; Perron, M.; Bannister, R.; Hui, H. C. Nature
Scheme 3. Synthesis of target xylo-C-nucleoside 8. Reagents and conditions:
2
016, 531, 381.
(g) TMSOTf, TMSCN, DCM, 0 °C, 2.5 h, 80%; (h) NH
3
/MeOH, 100 °C,
(
(
7) Lim, M. I.; Klein, R. S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1981, 22, 25.
8) Warren, T. K.; Wells, J.; Panchal, R. G.; Stuthman, K. S.; Garza, N. L.;
Van Tongeren, S. A.; Dong, L.; Retterer, C. J.; Eaton, B. P.; Pegoraro, G.
Nature 2014, 508, 402.
9) Patil, S. A.; Otter, B. A.; Klein, R. S. J. Heterocycl. Chem. 1994, 31, 781.
10) Li, Q.; Lescrinier, E.; Groaz, E.; Persoons, L.; Daelemans, D.;
Herdewijn, P.; De Jonghe, S. ChemMedChem 2018, 13, 97.
overnight, 86%; (i) BCl , DCM, 0 °C to rt, 2.5 h.
3
In order to evaluate the biological properties of the
synthesized xylo-C-nucleosides 7 and 8, both compounds were
screened against eight different tumor cell lines including
(
(