N-Acetyl-b-D-glucosaminyl-PEG 900-stearate conjugate (4).
Copper sulfate (53.4 mg, 0.34 mmol) and sodium ascorbate
(73.0 mg, 0.37 mmol) were added into a stirred solution of
propargyl-2-acetamido-2-deoxy-b-D-glucopyranoside (0.113 g,
0.44 mmol) and azide-PEG 3 (0.4 g, 0.34 mmol) in water/THF
(1 : 1 v/v). The mixture was heated at 40 ꢀC and the reaction was
monitored by TLC. After 24 hours, the solution was concen-
trated under vacuum. The residue was taken up in methylene
chloride, filtered and concentrated. Pure C18PEG900GlcNAc 4
(0.35 g, 72%) was isolated after silica gel flash column chroma-
tography using methylene chloride : methanol (8 : 2 v/v) as
spectroscopy using pyrene (Py) as a probe.31 Measurements of
steady-state fluorescence of pyrene were performed in Milli-Q
water at 25.0 ꢀC. Stock solution of pyrene (1 mM) was prepared
in dry ethanol. An aqueous solution of pyrene (10ꢂ6 M) was then
prepared by adding 0.1 mL of the pyrene stock solution into
100 mL of Milli-Q water. The solutions were then prepared from
the stock solution containing pyrene (10ꢂ6 M) and they were
allowed to equilibrate for at least 12 h prior to the acquisition of
emission spectra. This procedure minimizes errors in the emis-
sion intensity occurring in alternative methodologies.
The steady-state fluorescence spectra of pyrene were recorded
on a Perkin-Elmer LS50B Spectrofluorimeter equipped with
a thermostatted cell holder set at 25.0 ꢀC. Both slits of excitation
and emission monochromators were adjusted for 2.5 nm. The
samples were excited at 335 nm and the emission intensity spectra
were recorded at 372.8 nm (I1) and 384.0 nm (I3). Typically, the
fluorescence spectrum was recorded after the addition of each
microlitre of amphiphilic solution. The relative intensities were
corrected for each sample dilution prepared from the pyrene
stock solution. The I1/I3 ratio was estimated by taking into
account the ratio of the maximum peak intensity.
1
eluent. H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6, ppm): d ¼ 7.93 (s, 1H,
triazolyl), 7.49 (d, 1H, J ¼ 8.6 Hz, NH), 4.80–4.40 (m, 8H), 4.13
(t, 2H, J ¼ 4.2 Hz), 3.82 (t, 2H, J ¼ 4.8 Hz) 3.61–3.50 (m, 82H,
CH2O), 3.15 (2H, J ¼ 4.8 Hz), 2.28 (t, 2H, J ¼ 4 Hz), 2.08
(s, 11H), 1.78 (s, 3H), 1.5 (m, 2H), 1.24 (m, 18H), 0.86 (t, 3H,
J ¼ 6.6Hz, CH3). 13C NMR: (75 MHz, DMSO-d6, ppm): d ¼
172.8, 168.9, 143.5, 124.2, 100.2, 77.0, 74.2, 71.6, 70.7, 69.7, 69.6,
69.5, 68.7, 68.3, 67.9, 62.9, 61.2, 61.1, 55.3, 33.4, 31.2, 29.0, 28.8,
28.6, 28.4, 24.4, 23.0, 22.0, 13.9. ESI-HRMS calcd for
C69H132N4O27: m/z 1471.89767 [M + Na]+; found: 1471.8958.
b-Lactosyl-PEG 900-stearate conjugate (5). Copper sulfate
(61 mg, 0.39 mmol) and sodium ascorbate (79.2 mg, 0.40 mmol)
were added to a stirred solution of propargyl-b-lactoside
(0.190 g, 0.5 mmol) and azide-PEG900 3 (0.456 g, 0.39 mmol) in
Dynamic light scattering (DLS). The size and polydispersity of
the nanoparticles were accessed using DLS measurements. The
experiments were performed using an ALV Laser Goniometer,
which consists of a cylindrical 22 mW HeNe linear polarized
laser with l ¼ 632.8 nm and an ALV-5000/ALV Multiple Tau
Digital Correlator with a 125 ns initial sampling time.32 The
samples were kept at 25 ꢀC. The accessible scattering angle of the
equipment ranges from 20ꢀ to 150ꢀ. All samples were systemat-
ically studied at 90ꢀ and some of them were studied at different
scattering angles varying from 40ꢀ to 140ꢀ. The solutions were
put in ordinary 10 mm in diameter glass cells. The minimum
sample volume required for an experiment was 1 mL. The data
were acquired with the ALV-Correlator Control Software and
the counting time for each sample was in average 300 s. The
distributions of relaxation times—A(t)—were obtained by using
the CONTIN analysis of the auto-correlation function C(q,t).33
The relaxation frequency, G ¼ 1/s is a function of the scattering
angle.34 The apparent diffusion coefficient (Dapp) of the nano-
particles at a given copolymer concentration (Cp) is calculated
from eqn (1).
ꢀ
water/THF (1 : 1 v/v). The mixture was heated at 40 C and the
reaction was monitored by TLC. After 24 hours, the solution
was concentrated under vacuum. The residue was taken up in
methylene chloride, filtered and concentrated. Pure
C18PEG900Lac 5 (0.403 g, 67%) was isolated after silica gel flash
column chromatography using methylene chloride : methanol
1
(7 : 3 v/v) as eluent. H NMR: (400 MHz, DMSO-d6, ppm):
d ¼ 8.03 (1H, triazolyl), 4.91–4.32 (m, 12H), 4.12 (t, 2H, J ¼ 4.9
Hz), 3.82 (2H, J ¼ 4.8 Hz, CH2O) 3.58–3.50 (m, 78H, CH2O),
3.33 (2H, J ¼ 4.8 Hz), 2.29–2.27 (m, 2H), 1.5 (m, 2H), 1.24 (m,
28H), 0.86 (t, 3H, J ¼ 6.6Hz, CH3). 13C NMR: (75 MHz,
DMSO-d6, ppm): d ¼ 172.68, 143.39,124.35, 103.72, 101.71,
80.62, 77.06, 75.41, 74.85, 73.18, 73.03, 71.53, 70.48, 69.68,
69.54, 69.46, 68.61, 68.23, 68.03 67.81, 62.89, 61.53, 60.51,
60.29, 49.25, 33.34, 31.18, 28.90, 28.75, 28.56, 28.29, 24.36,
21.96, 13.83. ESI-HRMS calcd for C75H143N3O33: m/z
1636.95016 [M + Na]+; found: 1636.9507.
ꢀ
where q is the wave vector defined as
G
q2
ꢀ
q/0 ¼ Dapp
(1)
Nanoparticles preparation
ꢁ ꢂ
The nanoparticles suspensions (aqueous micellar solutions—
Cp ¼ 0.1–1.5 mg mLꢂ1) were prepared by direct dissolution of
the amphiphiles 3, 4 and 5 in Milli-Q water or in phosphate
buffered saline solution (PBS, 10 mM, pH 7ꢀ.2, 1 mM CaCl2,
1 mM MnCl2) and stirred for 24 hours at 25 C. The solutions
were then filtered using 0.45 mm pore size nylon membrane
filters in order to remove dust and large non-micellar aggre-
gates.
4pn
q
q ¼
sin
(2)
l
2
l being the wavelength of the incident laser beam (632.8 nm),
n the refractive index of the sample, and q the scattering angle.
The hydrodynamic radius (RH) (or diameter, 2RH) was calcu-
lated from the Stokes–Einstein relation given in eqn (3).
KBT
KBT
RH
¼
q2 ¼
(3)
6phG
6phDapp
Characterization of the nanoparticles
where kB is the Boltzmann constant, T is the temperature of
the sample and h is the viscosity of the solvent (water in this
case).35
Fluorescence spectroscopy. The critical micelle concentration
(CMC) of 3,
4 and 5 was determined by fluorescence
This journal is ª The Royal Society of Chemistry 2011
Soft Matter, 2011, 7, 3453–3461 | 3455