Please cite this article in press as: Guo et al., Efficient and Selective CO2 Reduction Integrated with Organic Synthesis by Solar Energy, Chem
into the solvent and then additional 1-phenylethanols from the solution bound to the
active sites to complete the reaction cycle. The mechanism of surface reaction pre-
sented here is quite different from our previous report of oxidizing alcohols to
carbonyl compounds in solution through a radical relay process.48 Notably, the en-
ergy barrier of Ca-H cleavage at S-vacancy of CdS (2.268 eV) was much lower than
that at Se-vacancy of CdSe (3.470 eV) (Figure 3C). This might be one of the reasons
for the significantly enhanced selectivity of pinacol production after introducing suit-
able thickness of CdS shell on CdSe QDs. The introduction of CdS shell simulta-
neously promoted CO2 reduction and CaÀH activation. As a result, the selectivity
of CO evolution and the yield of pinacol production were both dramatically
enhanced. The detailed mechanism diagram of CO2 reduction coupled with organic
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Solar-Light-Driven CO2 Reduction with Sacrificial Reagents49
First of all, 1.0 mL synthesized QDs solution was precipitated by adding excessive
amount of isopropanol. Subsequently, it was re-dispersed in 5.0 mL DMF, resulting
QDs DMF solution (c = 1.1 3 10À5 mol/L). Then, 1.0 mL TEA was added to 5 mL QDs
DMF solution. The solution was degassed by bubbling CO2 for 30 min to ensure the
dissolution of enough CO2 and 600 mL ultrapure CH4 was injected into the system to
work as the internal standard for quantitative GC analysis. Finally, the system was
irradiated under 450 nm LEDs (130 mW cmÀ2) at room temperature.
Solar-Light-Driven CO2 Reduction Integrated with Pinacol Synthesis50
First of all, 1.0 mL synthesized QDs solution was precipitated by adding excessive
amount of isopropanol. Subsequently, it was re-dispersed in 5.0 mL DMF, resulting
QDs DMF solution (c = 1.1 3 10À5 mol/L). Then, 60 mL (0.5 mmol) 1-phenylethanol
was added to 5 mL QDs DMF solution. 53 mg (0.5 mmol) Na2CO3 was employed
as the basic additive. The solution was degassed by bubbling CO2 for 30 min to
ensure the dissolution of enough CO2 and 600 mL ultrapure CH4 was injected
into the system to work as the internal standard for quantitative GC analysis.
Finally, the system was irradiated under 450 nm LEDs (130 mW cmÀ2) at room
temperature.
Quantification of Gas and Liquid Products
The generated gas in the reaction headspace for photocatalytic experiments were
quantified by a gas chromatograph (GC, Shimadzu GC2014CAFC/APC) equipped
˚
with a thermal conductivity detector and a 5 A molecular sieves GC column, argon
as a carrier gas. GC analysis revealed the production of CO and H2. Thus, CH4
was chosen as the internal standard for quantitative GC analysis. Under the experi-
mental condition, the response factors of CO/CH4 and H2/CH4 for GC analysis were
about 0.39 and 4.08, respectively, which were established by calibration with known
amounts of CO, H2 and CH4, and determined before and after measurements. On
the other hand, the produced liquid products were monitored by 1H NMR, 13C
NMR analysis (Avance-400) and liquid chromatograph-mass spectra (LC-MS,
Q-Exactive), revealing the major generation of pinacol. For further quantification
analysis, 0.1 mmol benzhydrol was added into CDCl3 solution as the internal stan-
dard. Error bars on CO, H2, and pinacol were calculated from at least three indepen-
dent experiments.
DFT Calculations
Taking CdSe (111) facet as an example, the first-principles calculations were per-
formed by the pseudopotential51 methods implemented in the package52 based
Chem 5, 1–12, October 10, 2019
9