curred at the 2-position of the xylyl linker in xylta4 appears to
be mostly due to the proximity effect of the metal center
depending upon their core structures in solution.
2
In summary, we have succeeded for the first time in the
regioselective hydroxylation of the xylyl linker of the carbox-
ylate-rich ligand (xylta4 ) by a Fe /CH
2
3+
CO /H O /H O
2
3 2 2 2
2
system. The reaction mimics the self-hydroxylation of a
phenylalanine side chain found for R2-W48F/D84E. Un-
fortunately, no intermediate was observed for the present
system due to the rapid hydroxylation of xylta4 , although a
peroxo intermediate has been detected for R2-W48F/D84E
system. The present ligands xylta4 and pyxyl afford two types
of the intramolecular diiron and intermolecular tetrairon
complexes, depending upon the side arms of the xylyl linker,
whose core structures seem to be responsible for hydroxylation
of the xylyl linker in this system.
2
2
Financial support of this research by the Ministry of
Education, Science, and Culture Grant-in-Aid for Scientific
Research to M. S. and Y. W. is gratefully acknowledged.
4
Fig. 1 ORTEP view (40% probability) of a complex anion of 1·Bu N.
Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity. Selected bond distances (Å) and
angle (°): Fe1…Fe2 3.458(1), Fe1–O1 2.017(1), Fe1–O2 1.982(2), Fe1–O4
Notes and references
1
2
2
.958(2), Fe1–O10 2.045(2), Fe1–O12 1.975(1), Fe1–N1 2.168(2), Fe2–O1
.029(1), Fe2–O6 1.981(1), Fe2–O8 1.955(2), Fe2–O11 1.970(2), Fe2–O13
.035(2), Fe2–N2 2.174(2); Fe1–O1–Fe2 117.43(6).
‡ Crystal data for 1·Bu
group P2 /a with Z = 4, a = 15.986(5), b = 17.475(3), c = 15.193(3) Å,
b = 91.69(2)°,V = 4243(1) Å , rcalcd = 1.418 g cm , R = 0.040, R
.061 for 6979 data with I > 3s(I). Crystal data for 2 at 2120 °C;
13Cl Fe 27, orthorhombic, space group Pnma with Z = 4, a =
4.961(2), b = 28.608(3), c = 12.617(4) Å, V = 9009(2) Å , rcalcd = 1.448
4
63 3 2
N at 2120 °C; C36H N Fe O16, monoclinic, space
1
3
23
w
=
0
C
2
75
H
83
N
4
4
O
4 2 2 3 2 4
complex, [Fe (O) (pyxyl) (CH CO )
]4+ (2), whose crystal
3
structure was determined by X-ray crystallography (Fig. 2).‡
Complex 2 has a dimer of dimer structure where two (m-
oxo)bis(m-acetato)diiron(III) cores are linked by a xylyl linker as
23
g cm , R = 0.064, R
w
= 0.106 for 6628 data with I > 3s(I). CCDC
2
00159 and 200160. See http://www.rsc.org/suppdata/cc/b3/b304171a/ for
crystallographic data in .cif format.
9
found for closely related complexes. The reaction of 2 with
H
2
O
2
in CH
3
CN/H
2
O (1 : 1) resulted in no hydroxylation of the
1 (a) M. Merkx, D. A. Kopp, M. H. Sazinsky, J. L. Blazyk, J. Müller and
S. J. Lippard, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2001, 40, 2782; (b) B. J. Wallar and
J. D. Lipscomb, Chem. Rev., 1996, 96, 2625; (c) E. I. Solomon, T. C.
Brunold, M. I. Davis, J. N. Kemsley, S.-K. Lee, N. Lehnert, F. Neese, A.
J. Skulan, Y.-S. Yang and J. Zhou, Chem. Rev., 2000, 100, 235.
xylyl linker of the pyxyl ligand and only original ligand was
recovered, which was confirmed by the ligand recovery
experiment. The results show a sharp contrast with those of the
xylta4 system. The reactivity of xylyl linkers in the xylta and
2
42
2
Bioinorganic Catalysis, 2nd edn,. eds. J. Reedijk and E. Bouwman,
Marcel Dekker, New York, 1999; Biomimetic Oxidations Catalyzed by
Transition Metal Complexes, ed. B. Meunier, Imperial College Press,
London, 1999; Metal-oxo and Metal-Peroxo Species in Catalytic
Oxidations, ed. B. Meunier, Springer, Berlin, 2000.
pyxyl ligand seems to be regulated by their structures in
solution; ESI-TOF/MS spectroscopy of 2 in CH CN revealed
3
that the tetranuclear unit remains intact (Fig. S5).† The crystal
structure of 2 indicates that the closest carbon atom of the xylyl
linker is apart from the diiron core by ~ 5 Å, which is too far for
3 J. Baldwin, W. C. Voegtli, N. Khidekel, P. Moënne-Loccoz, C. Krebs, A.
S. Pereira, B. A. Ley, B. H. Huynh, T. M. Loehr, P. J. Riggs-Gelasco, A.
C. Rosenzweig and J. M. Bollinger Jr., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2001, 123,
the hydroxylation. In contrast, the hydroxylated carbon atom of
the xylyl linker in xylta42 is expected to be close to the diiron
7
017.
core as postulated for the hydroxylation of [Cu
2
(XYL–H)]2
+
4
M. Fontecave, S. Ménage and C. Duboc-Toia, Coord. Chem. Rev., 1998,
with dioxygen.5a Thus the regioselective hydroxylation oc-
1
2
78–180, 1555; M. Costas, K. Chen and L. Que Jr., Coord. Chem. Rev.,
000, 200–202, 517; K. Chen, M. Costas and L. Que Jr., J. Chem. Soc.,
Dalton Trans., 2002, 672.
5
(a) K. D. Karlin, Y. Gultneh, J. C. Hayes, R. W. Cruse, J. W. McKown,
J. P. Hutchinson and J. Zubieta, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1984, 106, 2121; E.
Pidcock, H. V. Obias, C. X. Zhang, K. D. Karlin and E. I. Solomon, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 1998, 120, 7841; (b) Bioinorganic Chemistry of Copper, eds.
K. D. Karlin and Z. Tyeklár, Chapman & Hall, New York, 1993.
(a) S. Ménage, J.-B. Galey, G. Hussler, M. Seité and M. Fontecave,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1996, 35, 2353; S. Ménage, J.-B. Galey, J.
Dumats, G. Hussler, M. Seité, I. G. Luneau, G. Chottard and M.
Fontecave, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1998, 120, 13370; (b) S. J. Lange, H.
Miyake and L. Que Jr., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1999, 121, 6330; M. P. Jensen,
S. J. Lange, M. P. Mehn, E. L. Que and L. Que Jr., J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
6
7
2
003, 125, 2113.
The electronic spectral change for the reaction of 80 equiv. of H
a yellowish green aqueous mixture ( ~ 0.83 mM/[Fe ]) containing
xylta, Et N, FeCl , and CH CO Na (1 : 4 : 2 : 6) was very similar to
that for the reaction of 1 with 80 equiv. H in the presence of 4 equiv.
of CH CO Na at 0 °C (Fig. S2),† suggesting that both changes are due to
2 2
O with
2
H
4
3
3
3
2
2 2
O
3
2
the same reaction. The spectral change of 1 seems to be the formation of
a peroxo species having a phenolate bridge similar to that generated from
a closely related diiron(III) complex.8 Therefore the hydroxylation of
xylta4 seems to proceed very rapidly and the observed spectral change
Fig. 2 ORTEP view (40% probability) of a complex cation of 2. Hydrogen
atoms are omitted for clarity. Selected bond distances (Å) and angle (°):
Fe1…Fe2 3.117(1), Fe1…Fe1* 9.336(1), Fe1…Fe2* 10.259(1),
Fe2…Fe2* 9.614(1), Fe1–O1 1.791(3), Fe1–O2 2.073(3), Fe1–O4
2
2 2
may be due to the reaction of 1 with H O .
2
1
2
.038(3), Fe1–N1 2.246(3), Fe1–N2 2.173(3), Fe1–N3 2.177(4), Fe2–O1
.800(3), Fe2–O3 2.022(3), Fe2–O5 2.030(3), Fe2–N4 2.211(3), Fe2–N5
.200(3), Fe2–N6 2.141(3); Fe1–O1–Fe2 120.4(1). The atoms asterisked
8 B. P. Murch, F. C. Bradley and L. Que Jr., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1986, 108,
5027.
9 H. Toftlund, K. S. Murry, P. R. Zwack, L. F. Taylor and O. Anderson, J.
Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1986, 191; J. L. Sessler, J. D. Hugdahl, V.
Lynch and B. Davis, Inorg. Chem., 1991, 30, 334.
are those of the counter part of the dimer and generated by the symmetry
transformations: x, 1/2 2 y, z.
CHEM. COMMUN., 2003, 1900–1901
1901