8477
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by CREST and RFTF. S.M. thanks the JSPS Research Fellowships
for Young Scientists.
References
1
. Review: (a) Shuttleworth, S. J.; Allin, S. M.; Wilson, R. D.; Nasturica, D. Synthesis 2000, 1035. For a recent
representative of polymer-supported asymmetric Lewis acid catalysts, see: (b) Annis, D. A.; Jacobsen, E. N. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 4147; (c) Heckel, A.; Seebach, D. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 163. See also, Refs.
6
d,e.
2
3
4
. Shibasaki, M.; Sasai, H.; Arai, T. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1997, 36, 1236–1256.
. For asymmetric catalysts with two or more 1,1%-binaphthyl ligands, see: Pu, L. Chem. Rev. 1998, 98, 2405.
. Attempts to immobilize ALB 1, which consists of Al, Li, and two BINOLs, by the standard approach failed.
Polymer-supported ALB, prepared from AlMe (1 equiv.), BuLi (1 equiv.), and polymer-supported-BINOL 19 (2
3
equiv.) catalyzed the Michael reaction of 15 with 14 to give product 16 in only 18% yield and 27% ee, while
homogeneous ALB catalyzes the same reaction to give 16 in 99% ee (Ref. 2). In this case, other species than the
desirable ALB species, CH AlꢀBINOL and lithiumꢀBINOL, might coexist and so yield and ee became low. The
3
homogeneous CH AlꢀBINOL complex prepared from Al(CH ) (1 equiv.) and BINOL (1 equiv.) did not
3
3 3
promote the Michael reaction. On the other hand, the mono-lithium salt of BINOL prepared from BINOL (1
equiv.) and BuLi (1 equiv.) promoted the Michael reaction, but afforded product 16 in only 3% ee. Sasai et al.
reported similar results concerning polymer-supported ALB. They also reported a different strategy to tackle this
Polymer-supported ALB
O
+
1
) AlMe (1.0 mol eq), THF
3
OH
OH
Polymer-supported CH Al-BINOL
3
2) BuLi (1.0 mol eq)
+
Polymer-supported Li-BINOL
2.0 mol eq 19
difficult immobilization, see: Annual Meeting of the Pharmaceutical Society of Japan, March, 2000. Seebach et
al. reported similar phenomena in the Diels–Alder reaction catalyzed by polymer-supported Ti-TADDOLates, in
which the active species seemed to contain two or more TADDOLs. See: Seebach, D.; Marti, R. E.; Hintermann,
T. Helv. Chim. Acta 1996, 79, 1710. Although Sodeoka et al. reported a polymer-supported binuclear m-hydroxo
Pd complex, which promoted the asymmetric Mannich-type reaction in high ee, the active species in the reaction
was monomeric (1:1 complex) according to their precise mechanistic studies. See: Ref. 6c and references cited
therein.
5
6
. (a) The structure of GaꢀLi-linked-BINOL complex 4 was elucidated by X-ray analysis and compared with GaLB
2
: Matsunaga, S.; Das, J.; Roels, J.; Vogl, E. M.; Yamamoto, N.; Iida, T.; Yamaguchi, K.; Shibasaki, M. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 2252. (b) La-linked-BINOL 5: Kim, Y. S.; Matsunaga, S.; Das, J.; Sekine, A.; Ohshima,
T.; Shibasaki, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 6506.
. For examples possessing the spacer at the 6-position, see: (a) Bayston, D. J.; Fraser, J. L.; Ashton, M. R.; Baxter,
A. D.; Polywka, M. E. C.; Moses, E. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 3137. (b) Nozaki, K.; Itoi, Y.; Shibahara, F.;
Shirakawa, E.; Ohta, T.; Takaya, H.; Hiyama, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 4051. (c) Fujii, A.; Sodeoka, M.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 8011. (d) Kobayashi, S.; Kusakabe, K.; Ishitani, H. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 1225. For
other recent examples at the 3,3%-position, see: (e) Yang, X.-W.; Sheng, J.-H.; Da, C.-S.; Wang, H.-S.; Su, W.;
Wang, R.; Chan, A. S. C. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 295. For examples at the 2-position, see: (f) Uozumi, Y.;
Danjo, H.; Hayashi, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 8303. Pu et al. reported excellent soluble BINOL and/or
BINAP polymers, see: (g) Huang, W.-S.; Hu, Q.-S.; Zheng, X.-F.; Anderson, J.; Pu, L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997,
1
19, 4313. (h) Yu, H.-B.; Hu, Q.-S.; Pu, L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 6500 and references cited therein.