W. Weng et al. / Electrochimica Acta 92 (2013) 392–396
393
Table 1
Crystal data and structure refinement of complex 1a.
Formula
MW
Cryst. syst.
T (K)
C7H13BrN2O2S
269.16
Triclinic
a (Å)
b (Å)
c (Å)
˛ (◦)
ˇ (◦)
Z
6.7476(2)
7.5071(2)
11.0657(3)
101.982(1)
92.5430(1)
2
1.722
0.0262, 0.0751
0.0267, 0.0774
150(2)
0.71073 A
˚
Wavelength
Space group
Fig. 1. Resonance structures of DMSO (left) and representative solvents containing
O groups (right).
P − 1
4.133
272
S
ꢀ (mm−1
F(0 0 0)
GoF
)
ꢁ (g cm−3
)
R1, wR2 [I > 2(I)]
R1, wR2 (all data)
1.193
R1 = ꢂ ||Fo| − |Fc||/ꢂ|Fo|; wR2 = [ꢂw(Fo − Fc2)2/ꢂw(Fo2)2]1/2
;
2
2. Experimental
GoF = [ꢂw(Fo − Fc2)2/(Nobs − Nvar)]1/2
.
2
2.1. Chemical and materials
2.2.3. Synthesis of [ImC2HSO2CH3][TFSI] (2a)
All manipulations were carried out under a nitrogen atmo-
sphere, using standard Schlenk techniques and dried solvents. All
reagents were purchased from Aldrich and used as received. 1H and
13C NMR experiments were performed on a Bruker model DMX 500
NMR spectrometer (11.7 T).
To a solution of [ImC2HSO2CH3]Br (12.36 g, 0.046 mol) in
distilled water (30 mL) was added lithium bis(trifluorometha-
nesulfonyl)imide (13.2 g, 0.046 mol). The reaction mixture was
stirred for 24 h at ambient temperature. Distilled water (100 mL)
was added to the mixture and the bottom layer was extracted
with dichloromethane. The organic layer separated was washed
with fresh distilled water, dried over MgSO4. The crude solution
was stirred with decolorizing charcoal and filtered through a plug
of celite and then a plug of activated alumina. The solution was
concentrated by removing the solvent under reduced pressure and
dried at 100 ◦C under vacuum. Yield: 12 g (62%). 1H NMR (500 MHz,
CD3CN): ı 8.49 (s, 1H), 7.45 (br, s, 1H), 7.34 (br, s, 1H), 4.59 (t, J = 7 Hz,
2H, N CH2), 3.82 (s, 3H, N CH3), 3.57 (t, J = 7 Hz, 2H, CH2SO2), 2.95
(s, 3H, SO2CH3). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CD3CN): ı 136.7 (s), 123.8 (s),
2.2. Ionic liquid synthesis
2.2.1. Synthesis of 2-Bromoethyl methyl sulfone [9]
PBr3(20 g, 0.074 mol) was added slowly to 2-methylsulfonyl
ethanol (25 g, 0.2 mol) with vigorous stirring under Ar atmosphere.
The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 4 days
to afford a dark-blue solution. Millipore water (30 mL) was care-
fully added to quench the reaction. The aqueous solution was
stored frozen for 1 h and crystalline compounds were formed from
slow thawing at ambient temperature. Yield: 16 g (43%). 1H NMR
(500 MHz, CDCl3): ı 3.70 (t, J = 7 Hz, 2H, BrCH2), 3.54 (t, J = 7 Hz, 2H,
CH2SO2), 3.00 (s, 3H, SO2CH3). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CD3Cl): ı 56.9
(s, BrCH2), 41.9 (s, CH2SO2), 21.1 (s, SO2CH3).
1
122.7 (s), 119.7 (q, JC–F = 319 Hz, TFSI), 52.6 (s), 42.8 (s), 41.1 (s),
36.0 (s).
2.2.4. Attempted synthesis of [ImC2MeSO2CH3]Br (1b)
A mixture of 1,2-dimethylimidazole (7.2 g, 0.075 mol) and 2-
bromoethyl methyl sulfone (14 g, 0.075 mol) was charged into a
round-bottom flask equipped with a condenser. The mixture was
stirred at 60 ◦C for 24 h. The resulting yellow and viscous oil was
analyzed by 1H NMR, which showed that 2a constitute ca. <20% of
the resulting mixture. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): ı 7.95 (d, J = 2 Hz,
1H), 7.46 (d, J = 2 Hz, 1H), 4.77 (t, J = 6 Hz, 2H, N CH2), 3.92 (t, J = 6 Hz,
2.2.2. Synthesis of 1-methyl-3-(2-(methylsulfonyl)ethyl)-
1H-imidazol-3-ium bromide, [ImC2HSO2CH3]Br (1a)
A
mixture of 1-methylimidazole (2 g, 0.024 mol) and 2-
2H, CH2SO2). Identification and assignment of the full set of the 1
NMR resonance of 1b was not possible because of the presence of
other compounds.
H
bromoethyl methyl sulfone (4.62 g, 0.024 mol) was charged into a
round-bottom flask equipped with a condenser. The mixture was
stirred at 60 ◦C for 24 h. The resulting yellow and viscous oil was
washed with CH3CN and then dried under vacuum. Yield: 4.54 g
(83%). 1H NMR (500 MHz, d6-DMSO): ı 9.22 (s, 1H), 7.84 (t, J = 2 Hz,
1H), 7.72 (t, J = 2 Hz, 1H), 4.66 (t, J = 7 Hz, 2H, N CH2), 3.85 (s, 3H,
2.3. Instrumentation and Procedures
N
CH3), 3.82 (t, J = 7 Hz, 2H, CH2SO2), 3.01 (s, 3H, SO2CH3). 13C NMR
2.3.1. Electrochemical testing
The charge–discharge cycling performance was tested on a
Maccor Electrochemical Analyzer using 2032 coin cells with
(125 MHz, d6-DMSO): ı 137.3 (s), 123.6 (s), 122.7 (s), 52.5 (s), 42.6
(s), 41.0 (s), 35.9 (s).
Fig. 2. Reaction scheme for the synthesis of sulfone-functionalized ionic liquid.