Reactions of Nitrogen Oxides with Heme Models
A R T I C L E S
Scheme 3
The situation is more ambiguous with regard to scenario (ii),
which predicts system A formation of (15N)2O3 and Fe(TPP)-
(NO2)(15NO) (after isomerization of the initially formed nitrito
complex) and system B formation of Fe(TPP)(15NO2)(NO) and
N2O3. For each set of reaction conditions, products not predicted
by scenario (ii) were formed, Fe(TPP)(15NO2)(15NO) in system
A and Fe(TPP)(NO2)(15NO) in system B.
As outlined in greater detail in Supporting Information
Scheme S1, scenario iii predicts the formation of Fe(TPP)-
(15NO2)(15NO), Fe(TPP)(NO2)(15NO), and both doubly and
singly labeled dinitrogen trioxide for the conditions of system
A, and Fe(TPP)(15NO2)(NO), Fe(TPP)(NO2)(NO), and both
singly labeled and unlabeled dinitrogen trioxide for the condi-
tions of system B. The experimental results obtained are in
agreement with scenario iii with the exception that only one
type of dinitrogen trioxide was observed under each set of
conditions, namely (15N)2O3 for system A and N2O3 for system
B. A possible explanation of this inconsistency would be isotopic
scrambling of the monolabeled species O15NNO2 and ON15NO2
by reaction with the excess nitric oxide present (15NO in system
A and NO in system B). This would give dinitrogen trioxide
with the same nitrogen labeling as the added nitric oxide (15NO
and NO, respectively). This process should be facilitated by
the formation of dinitrogen trioxide species isomers at very low
temperatures.26 Consistent with this point of view is the absence
of published data describing the mixed isotope species as
O15NNO2 or ON15NO2.
•
The fundamental problem with scenario iii is that the NO3
radical is a high energy species,28 and although its formation
from 2 should be facilitated by the high thermodynamic stability
of 4, the first step in this sequence would appear to be
substantially uphill. However, an alternative step by which the
loss of an •NO3 equivalent might be effected would be the direct
reaction of the excess NO with the coordinated nitrate ligand.
In effect, this is equivalent to the reductive nitrosation of a
coordinated ligand identified recently with a copper(II) com-
plex29 in the context that the coordinated anion is nitrosated
concomitant with the reduction of the metal center (in this case
the reduced metal species is 4) as illustrated in eq 2. With X-
) nitrate and LmMn+ ) Fe(TPP)(NO), the concerted transfer
of a NO3 equivalent to NO to give some form of N2O4 and the
very stable 4 as intermediates would give the same product
distributions as scenario iii while avoiding the formation of the
very high energy nitrate radical.
[LmM-X:]n+ + NO f [LmM]n+ + X-NO
(2)
The possible exchange reaction between NO and N2O3 was
examined under closely related experimental conditions using
amorphous Ni(TPP) layers as adsorbent.27 Partly oxidized NO
was deposited on the Ni(TPP) layer at 80 K and warmed to
120 K, and then the system was evacuated to expel any free
NO and then cooled back to 80 K. This procedure led to the
formation of N2O3 which was manifested by IR bands at 1842,
1593, and 1292 cm-1 and a small amount of N2O4 in the layer
Hence, we believe that the most plausible mechanism for
formation of Fe(TPP)(NO2)(NO) (3) from 2 involves the
pathway represented in Scheme 3. Reaction of NO2 with the
nitrosyl complex 4 would rapidly give 3.6 Notably, the reaction
of NO with coordinated nitrate to give an ONONO2 species is
the microscopic reversal of a likely first step in the formation
of Ru(TTP)(ONO2)(NO) by the reaction of N2O4 with Ru(TTP)-
(CO).21
Higher Temperature Reactions of Fe(TPP)(NOx) Films
with NO. For system A, further warming of the layer does not
significantly change the intensity of the 1296 cm-1 band of Fe-
(TPP)(NO2)(15NO), but the νs(15NO2) and νa(15NO2) bands (1275
and 1422 cm-1, respectively) corresponding to the fully labeled
nitro nitrosyl complex Fe(TPP)(15NO2)(15NO) grow more
intense. An analogous pattern is observed for system B (excess
NO) where the intensity of the νs(15NO2) band for Fe(TPP)-
(15NO2)(NO) (1275 cm-1) grows only to a certain level while
intensities of the νs(NO2) and νa(NO2) bands of Fe(TPP)(NO2)-
(NO) (1296 and 1452 cm-1, respectively) continue to increase.
At the end of this stage of reaction, the layers consist mostly of
Fe(TPP)(15NO2)(15NO) and Fe(TPP)(NO2)(NO) for experiments
with excess 15NO and NO, correspondingly. This process can
be rationalized according to the hypothetical pathway presented
in Scheme 4. Other mechanisms involving oxidation of coor-
dinated NO by NO2, decomposition of a putative dinitro
with weak IR bands at 1734 and 1254 cm-1 22 15
NO was then
.
introduced into the cryostat, and the FTIR spectra of this system
were measured at various temperatures upon slow warming. This
procedure showed that isotope exchange reaction occurs at
temperatures as low as 140 K. Thus, under the experimental
conditions used in the NO reaction with 2 to give 3, the
suggested isotopic exchange reaction should indeed lead to
formation of dinitrogen trioxide species dominated by the
isotopic composition of the excess nitric oxide.
Hence, of the three scenarios described by Scheme 2, the
most plausible appears to be scenario iii, which is represented
as initiating by elimination of a •NO3 radical (however, see the
discussion below). Beside the experimental results given above,
there is additional, indirect evidence consistent with this
scenario. During the course of the reaction of Fe(TPP)(ONO2)-
(NO) (2) with NO to give Fe(TPP)(NO2)(NO) (3), a weak band
in the vicinity of 1675 cm-1 initially grows and then diminishes
in intensity (Figure 3). This can be interpreted in terms of
formation and decay of Fe(TPP)(NO) (4) as an intermediate
•
resulting from NO3 elimination.
(28) (a) The electron affinity of the NO3 radical has been reported27b to be 375
kJ mol-1. (b) Lias, S. G.; Barmes, J. E.; Holmes, J. L.; Levin, R. D.; Mallard,
W. G. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 1988, 17 (Suppl. 1), 1-86 as summarized
on p 43 in Huheey, J. E.; Keiter, E. A.; Keiter, R. L. Inorganic Chemistry,
4th ed.; Harper-Collins College Publishers: New York, 1993.
(29) (a) Tsuge, K.; DeRosa, F.; Lim, M. D.; Ford, P. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2004, 126, 6564-6565. (b) Ford, P. C.; Fernandez, B. O.; Lim, M. D.
CR0307289.
(25) Wayne, R. P., et al. Atmos. EnViron. 1991, 25A, 1-203.
(26) Fateley, W. G.; Bent, H. A.; Crawford, B. J. Chem. Phys. 1959, 31, 204-
217.
(27) (a) At low temperatures, sublimed layers of Ni(TPP) react with neither
NO nor NO2, while at room temperature NO2 oxidizes porphyrin ring with
formation of Ni(TPP)•+(NO2)- ion pair.26b (b) Martirosyan, G. G.; Kur-
tikyan, T. S. Zh. Prikl. Khim. (Russ.) 1998, 71, 1595-1598.
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 127, NO. 17, 2005 6221