7194
P. Karthikeyan et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 54 (2013) 7193–7197
Table 2
catalyst in the solvents used for extraction of the product on the
one hand and high solubility in the reaction medium on the other
hand.9 This strategy was applied to Suzuki reaction providing high
yields and good recyclability of the catalyst.10,11
The objectives of the present study are to: (i) develop an effi-
cient synthetic process for the facile conversion of Suzuki–Miyaura
reaction. (ii) The present method developed for the Suzuki–Miya-
ura reaction offers many advantages including high conversion,
short duration, and the involvement of non-toxic reagent.
The palladium complex catalyzed Suzuki–Miyaura reaction was
carried out using phenyl boronic acid and bromo benzene as a
model reaction to investigate different parameters, such as effects
of solvent and duration, diverse bases, different catalysts, and its
concentration. Initially, the influence of different bases on the
model reaction was studied and these results are summarized in
Table 1. It was observed that, organic bases showed maximum con-
version over the inorganic bases. Moreover, this reaction was
unsuccessful in the absence of base (Table 1, entry 1). There was
no product formation between phenyl boronic acid and bromo
benzene in the presence of pyridine and imidazole (Table 1, entries
2 and 3). Furthermore, Suzuki–Miyaura reaction was carried out
using K2CO3, KOH, NaOH, and Et3N; from the results the formation
of biphenyl increases from 40% to 94% (Table 1, entries 4–7). After
standardizing the best catalyst systems, we further optimized the
reaction conditions in the presence of Et3N.
The experimental results show that the decrease of reaction
time from 20 h to 1 h gave full conversion and 94% yield (Table 1,
entries 8–13). However, the yields dropped appreciably on
decreasing the time from 1 h to 0.25 h (Table 1, entries 14–16).
From these experimental results it was concluded that 1 mmol
Et3N is sufficient to complete the reaction in 1 h at 25 °C.
Subsequently, in order to find a suitable solvent for the reaction,
the coupling of bromo benzene and phenyl boronic acid was car-
ried out with different solvents and Et3N. According to publications
from Wang,4 Hou,5 Wang,6 and Iranpoor7 polar, aprotic solvents
tend to give the best results. Among the previous reports, catalysis
in the presence of 1-aminoethyl-3-methyl imidazolium bromide
Effect of the solvent on the Suzuki–Miyaura reactiona
Br
B(OH)2
[Gmim]Cl-Pd(II)
+
25°C/Base
[Aemim]Br
Entry
Solvent
Temp (°C)
Time (h)
Yieldb (%)
TONc
TOFc
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Methanol
Ethanol
DCM
CHCl3
THF
CH3CN
DMF
[Aemim]Br
[Aemim]Br
[Aemim]Br
Water (5 mL)
50
65
35
50
50
60
130
25
20
35
90
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
1
Trace
Trace
Trace
Trace
Trace
51
67
94
90
95
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
510
670
940
900
950
430
21
27
940
900
950
17
1
1
24
10
11
43
a
Reaction condition: Bromo benzene (1 mmol), phenyl boronic acid (1.2 mmol),
solvent (5 mL), Et3N (1 mmol), solvent (1 mL), and [Gmim]Cl-Pd(II) (0.1 mol %)
stirring at different temperatures (see Table 2).
b
Yield determined by HPLC.
c
TON, turnover number; TOF, turnover frequency (mol product molÀ1 catalyst
hÀ1).
Table 3
Effect of various catalysts on Suzuki–Miyaura reactiona
Br
B(OH)2
[Gmim]Cl-Pd(II)
+
25°C/Base
[Aemim]Br
Entry
1
Catalyst
-Glycine
Time (h)
Yieldb (%)
TONc
—
TOFc
—
24
Trace
L
2
3
4
5
6
7
Chloroglycine [Cl-gly]
PdCl2/[Cemim]Br
PdCl2/[Aemim]Br
PdCl2/[Gmim]Cl
[Gmim]Cl-Pd(II)
[Gmim]Cl-Pd(II)
24
24
24
24
1
Trace
65
70
75
94
—
—
27
29
31
940
470
650
700
750
940
940
2
94
a
Reaction condition: Bromo benzene (1 mmol), phenyl boronic acid (1.2 mmol),
Table 1
triethylamine (1 mmol), [Aemim]Br (1 mL), and catalyst (0.1 mol %) stirring at
Effect of the base and time on Suzuki–Miyaura reactiona
25 °C.
b
Br
Yield determined by HPLC.
B(OH)2
[Gmim]Cl-Pd(II)
+
c
TON, turnover number; TOF, turnover frequency (mol product molÀ1 catalyst
hÀ1).
25°C/Base
[Aemim]Br
Entry
Base
Time (h)
Yieldb (%)
TONc
TOFc
[Aemim]Br was the most productive, as compared with the polar
and non-polar solvents (Table 2). This may be due to the easy coor-
dination of complex with organic co-solvents. It has also been re-
ported that water molecule sometimes is required to activate the
Pd(II) catalyst. In our case, carrying out the reaction in H2O
(5 mL) 90 °C gave a negative effect on the product yield in compar-
ison with [Aemim]Br. This lower yield could be due to decomposi-
tion of the complex under aqueous conditions.
Next, in order to optimize the conditions for this coupling reac-
tion of bromo benzene and phenyl boronic acid, the reaction was
executed in the presence of Et3N using different catalysts and the
results are given in Table 3. When the reaction was carried out
using various catalysts such as chloroglycine, PdCl2/1-carboxy
ethyl-3-methyl imidazolium bromide [Cemim]Br, PdCl2/[Ae-
mim]Br, and PdCl2/[Gmim]Cl with Et3N, it gave trace to 75% of
product respectively (Table 3, entries 1–5). When the same reac-
tion was conducted with [Gmim]Cl-Pd(II) as a catalyst it gave good
yield of the product in short duration (Table 3, entry 6). No further
increase in yield was observed on increasing the reaction time
(Table 3, entry 7).
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
—
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
20
18
12
6
3
1
0.75
0.50
0.25
Trace
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
20
20
22
39
47
52
Imidazole
Py
—
KOH
K2CO3
NaOH
Et3N
Et3N
Et3N
Et3N
Et3N
Et3N
Et3N
Et3N
Et3N
Et3N
48
50
55
94
94
94
94
94
94
94
90
86
83
480
500
550
940
940
940
940
940
940
940
900
860
830
78
156
313
940
1200
1720
3320
a
Reaction condition: Bromo benzene (1 mmol), phenyl boronic acid (1.2 mmol),
different base (1 mmol), [Aemim]Br (1 mL), and [Gmim]Cl-Pd(II) (0.1 mol %) stirring
at 25 °C.
b
Yield determined by HPLC.
c
TON, turnover number; TOF, turnover frequency (mol product molÀ1 catalyst
hÀ1).