However, the instability of 1 under basic conditions10
has restricted its use in annulations with R,β-unsaturated
carbonyl derivatives, in which the reagent successively acts
as a Michael donor and a Michael acceptor.11,12 To over-
come this limitation, as well as the difficulties associated
with the preparation and purification of the Nazarov
reagent, more stable modified reagents substituted at the
olefinic carbons13 and suitable precursors allowing its in
situ generation14 have been developed. In contrast with the
original Nazarov reagent, the substituted reagents, exten-
sively used by Deslongchamps, react in their enolate form,
smoothly undergoing base-catalyzed double Michael
addition reactions to give cis-decalin derivatives.13
Scheme 2. Attempted Double Michael Addition with the
Nazarov Reagent, 1
In this letter we present a stable and practical synthetic
equivalent of the Nazarov reagent, the silyl derivative 2,
that we have developed in the context of our studies on the
use of tryptophanol-derived lactams in the enantioselective
synthesis of indole alkaloids.15 We envisaged a straightfor-
ward approach to pentacyclic yohimbine-type derivatives,
in which the carbocyclic E ring would be assembled by a
double Michael addition of the Nazarov reagent (1) to
unsaturated indoloquinolizidine lactams 4. These lactams,
which incorporate an additional activating electron-
withdrawing substituent, were prepared in good overall
yields by conventional methods from the known lactam
3,16 as outlined in Scheme 2.
Initial attempts to perform the annulation of the Nazarov
reagent 1 with unsaturated lactam 4a (Cs2CO3/ CH2Cl2
or KF/MeOH) were unsuccessful, resulting in complete
degradation of 1. When using lactam 4b, which bears a
benzenesulfonyl activating substituent, annulation occurred
to some extent, pentacycle 5b being isolated in very low
yield from the resulting complex mixture.
methyl substituted Nazarov reagent 617 with the above
lactams 4a and 4b to give the respective pentacyclic
derivatives 8a and 8b as single stereoisomers in excellent
yields18 (Scheme 3). Although it was possible to stereo-
selectively remove the benzenesulfonyl group of 8b with
retention of the configuration,19 the presence of the methyl
substituent in the carbocyclic E ring makes pentacyclic
derivative 9 unsuitable for the synthesis of yohimbine-type
natural products.
At this point, we decided to design a synthetic equivalent
of the Nazarov reagent that would overcome the incon-
veniences and limitations of the original reagent 1. Bearing
inmindthatR-silylatedvinylketoneshavebeenextensively
used as surrogate vinyl ketones in annulation reactions,20
we planned to prepare a Nazarov-type reagent, such as 2,
silylated at the R-position of the enone (Scheme 4). The
R-trimethylsilyl group would increase the electrophilicity
of the β-carbon, stabilize the R-anion formed upon
Michael addition, and slow down the polymerization due
to its steric bulk. Additionally, being R-ketonic in the final
compound, the silyl substituent could readily be removed
by nucleophiles.
Despite these unsatisfactory results, the viability of our
double Michael addition strategy was confirmed by the
successful Cs2CO3-mediated reaction of the more stable
(10) Benetti, S.; Carlo, S.; De Risi, C.; Pollini, G. P.; Veronese, A. C.;
Zanirato, V. Synlett 2008, 2609–2612.
(11) (a) For the double Michael addition of the Nazarov reagent to a
nitroalkene, see: Albertini, E.; Barco, A.; Benetti, S.; Risi, C. D.; Pollini,
G. P.; Romagnoli, R.; Zanirato, V. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 35, 9297–
9300. (b) However, see: Hoashi, Y.; Yabuta, T.; Yuan, P.; Miyabe, H.;
Takemoto, Y. Tetrahedron 2006, 62, 365–374.
(12) For the use of the Nazarov reagent in organocatalytic asym-
metric tandem Michael/MoritaÀBaylisÀHillman reactions, see: Cabrera,
ꢀ
S.; Aleman, J.; Bolze, P.; Bertelsen, S.; Jorgensen, K. A. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2008, 47, 121–125.
ꢀ
(13) (a) Lavallee, J.-F.; Deslongchamps, P. Tetrahedron Lett. 1988,
ꢀ
29, 5117–5118. (b) Lavallee, J.-F.; Spino, C.; Ruel, R.; Hogan, K. T.;
Deslongchamps, P. Can. J. Chem. 1992, 70, 1406–1426.
(14) (a) Ellis, J. E.; Dutcher, J. S.; Heathcock, C. H. Synth. Commun.
1974, 4, 71–77. (b) Wakselman, C.; Molines, H. Synthesis 1979, 622–623.
(c) Michael, J. P.; Zwane, M. I. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33, 4755–4758.
See also ref 10.
The silyl derivative 2 waspreparedfrom(1-bromovinyl)-
trimethylsilane (10) via the known21 allylic alcohol 11, by a
route inspired in the preparation of the Nazarov reagent
1.1b,c Dess-Martin oxidation of 11, followed by acylation
of the unstable acrolein derivative 12 with the enolate
(15) (a) Amat, M.; Santos, M. M. M.; Bassas, O.; Llor, N.; Escolano,
ꢀ
ꢀ
C.; Gomez-Esque, A.; Molins, E.; Allin, S. M.; McKee, V.; Bosch, J.
ꢀ
ꢀ
J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 5193–5201. (b) Amat, M.; Gomez-Esque, A.;
Escolano, C.; Santos, M. M. M.; Molins, E.; Bosch, J. J. Org. Chem.
ꢀ
2009, 74, 1205–1211. (c) Perez, M.; Arioli, F.; Rigacci, G.; Santos,
M. M. M.; Gomez-Esque, A.; Escolano, C.; Florindo, P.; Ramos, C.;
(18) When the reaction from 4b was conducted for shorter times,
mixtures of 8b and the intermediate Michael adduct 7b were formed.
(19) The cis D/E ring junction in 9 and 16 was evident from the
positive NOE effect between 15-H and 20-H.
(20) Stork, G.; Ganem, B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1973, 95, 6152–6153.
(21) Lipshutz, B. H.; Mollard, P.; Lindsley, C.; Chang, V. Tetra-
hedron Lett. 1997, 38, 1873–1876.
ꢀ
ꢀ
Bosch, J.; Amat, M. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2011, 3858–3863. (d) Amat, M.;
ꢀ
Ramos, C.; Perez, M.; Molins, E.; Florindo, P.; Santos, M. M. M.;
Bosch, J. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 1954–1956.
(16) Allin, S. M.; Thomas, C. I.; Doyle, K.; Elsegood, M. R. J. J. Org.
Chem. 2005, 70, 357–359.
(17) Pollet, P.; Gelin, S. Synthesis 1978, 142–143.
B
Org. Lett., Vol. XX, No. XX, XXXX