5286 J. Agric. Food Chem., Vol. 54, No. 15, 2006
Gao et al.
about 2 h, the mixture was concentrated. Chromatographic purification
on silica (R ) 0.5, ethyl acetate:petroleum ether, 1:5) gave 2.5 g of
benzyl-3-[(()cyano[(()-(cis)-3-[(Z)-3-chloro-4,4,4-trifluorobut-1-enyl-
,2-dimethyl]cyclopropanecarbonyloxy]phenoxy]benzenepropanoate
Cwb-5) as a straw yellow sticky liquid; yield, 75%. 1H NMR
CDCl ): δ 1.28-1.33 [6H, t, (CH C], 2.01-2.05 (1H, d, CHCO),
.49-2.31 (1H, t, dCHCH), 2.67-2.72 (2H, t, COCH ), 2.95-2.99
2H, t, phCH CH ), 5.12 (2H, s, phCH O), 6.31, 6.37 (1H, s, CNCH),
.80-6.81 (1H, d, dCH), 6.92-7.39 (13H, m, ArH). Following the
above procedure for Cwb-5, the reaction of DCC (1.7 g, 8.2 mmol),
Dwb-3 (2.2 g, 7.4 mmol), and (()-(cis)-3-[(Z)-3-chloro-4,4,4-trifluo-
robut-1-enyl-2,2-dimethyl]cyclopropane carboxylic acid (2.41 g, 9.9
mmol) gave 2.57 g of 3-[(()cyano[(()-(cis)-3-[(Z)-3-chloro-4,4,4-
trifluorobut-1-enyl-2,2-dimethyl]cyclopropanecarbonyloxy]phenoxy]-
K
2
CO
3
in 11.5 mL of DMF. The mixture was heated to reflux at 150
f
°C for 10 h and then poured into 200 mL of ice water. A brown solid
was formed. The brown solid was dissolved completely in the solution
(ethyl acetate:petroleum ether ) 1:1) when heated. The solution was
kept in 4 °C overnight. After filtration, 2.1 g of 3-(4-nitrophenoxy)-
benzaldehyde (N-1) as a yellow solid was obtained; yield, 87%. H
3
NMR (CDCl ): δ 7.05-8.26 (8H, m ArH), 10.02 (1H, s, CHO).
Step J. (()Cyano 3-(4-aminophenoxy)phenyl-(()-cis-3-(Z-2-chloro-
3,3,3-trifluoroprop-1-enyl)-2,2-dimethylcycloproanecarboxylate (N-4)
was obtained according to the procedures of Shan et al. (11). Stannous
chloride hydrate (1.4 g, 6.2 mmol) was added to a stirred solution of
N-3 (0.6 g, 1.2 mmol) in 0.75 mL of ethanol (EtOH), and the mixture
2
(
(
2
(
1
3
3
)
2
2
2
2
2
6
was heated under N at 70-75 °C for 30 min. The mixture was cooled
and poured into a slurry of water, ether, and Celiet (0.4 g). NaHCO3
2
acetic acid benzyl ester (Dwb-4), yield 62%, which was a pea green
(1.4 g, 1.2 mmol) was added in portions and stirred until CO evolution
2
1
sticky liquid. H NMR (CDCl
3
): δ 1.23-1.34 [6H, t, (CH
3
)
2
C], 2.00-
ceased. The mixture was filtered, and solids were extracted with ether.
Combined ether extracts were stripped, and the residue was chromato-
graphed on a 5 g silica gel column (50% CH Cl /hexane f CH Cl )
2
2
.04 (1H, dd, CHCO), 2.21-2.28 (1H, q, dCHCH), 4.69 (2H, s, CH -
CO), 5.25 (2H, s, phCH ), 6.30-6.36 (1H, d, CNCH), 6.81-6.85 (1H,
2
2
2
2
2
d, dCH), 6.94-7.38 (9H, m, ArH). The reaction of N-2 (1.6 g, 5.9
mmol), (()-(cis)-3-[(Z)-3-chloro-4,4,4-trifluorobut-1-enyl-2,2-dimethyl]-
cyclopropane carboxylic acid (1.41 g, 5.3 mmol) and DCC (1.22 g,
to give 0.4 g of N-4, yield 70%, as a colorless viscous gum. TLC Rf
0.3 (CH Cl ). The TLC spot rapidly darkened on exposure to sunlight.
2
2
1
H NMR (CDCl ): δ 1.22-1.39 [6H, t, (CH ) C], 2.01-2.05 (1H, d,
3
3 2
5
(
.9 mmol) gave 0.61 g of (()cyano[3-(4-nitrophenoxy)phenyl]methyl-
()-cis-3-(Z-2-chloro-3,3,3-trifluoroprop-1-enyl)-2,2-dimethylcyclopro-
pane carboxylate (N-3), yield 21%, which was a brown sticky liquid.
COCH), 2.21-2.27 (1H, t, dCHCH), 3.60 (2H, s, b, NH ), 6.28-6.35
(1H, d, CNCH), 6.68-6.70 (1H, d, dCH), 6.70-7.37 (8H, m, ArH).
2
Hapten Conjugation. Conjugates were synthesized according to
water-soluble carbodiimide and diazotization methods (11). Immuno-
gens were conjugates of haptens N-4, Cwb-6, or Dwb-5 with BSA.
Coating antigens were conjugates of haptens Cwb-6, N-4, or Dwb-5
with OVA.
Polyclonal Antibody Production. Female New Zealand white
rabbits were injected subcutaneously five times with 1 mg of BSA-
hapten conjugate at 2 week intervals. The first injection consisted of 1
mL of the conjugate mixed with 1 mL of complete Freund’s adjuvant.
Incomplete adjuvant was used instead of complete in the subsequent
boost injections. The rabbits were bled from the ear vein 10 days after
each injection except for the initial injection.
1
H NMR (CDCl
3
3 2
): δ 1.24-1.35 [6H, m, (CH ) C], 2.04-2.07 (1H, d,
CHCO), 2.24-2.31 (1H, q, dCHCH), 6.38-6.43 (1H, d, CNCH),
6
.79-6.83, (1H, d, dCH), 7.03-8.26 (8H, m, ArH).
Step F. 3-[(()Cyano[(()-(cis)-3-[(Z)-3-chloro-4,4,4-trifluorobut-1-
enyl-2,2-dimethyl]cyclopropane carbonyloxy]phenoxy]propanoic acid
(
Cwb-6) and 3-[(()cyano[(()-(cis)-3-[(Z)-3-chloro-4,4,4-trifluorobut-
-enyl-2,2-dimethyl]cyclopropane carbonyloxy]phenoxy]acetic acid
Dwb-5) were synthesized according to the procedure of Wengatz et
al. (18). The ester Cwb-5 (1.4 g, 2.3 mmol) in 1.5 mL of dry CH Cl
1
(
2
2
was treated with 20 µL of bis(trimethylsilyl)trifluoroacetamide (BSTFA)
followed by iodotrimethylsilane (TMSI, 0.18 mL). After 1.5 h, 5 drops
of water and 1 mL of CH
for 5 min. The organic phase was immediately flash-chromatographed
on 10 g of silica gel G450 (CH Cl f ethyl acetate). The product was
2
Cl
2
were added and the mixture was stirred
Enzyme Immunoassay. The method was identical to that reported
by Shan et al. (11) with the following modifications. The blocking
solution was 0.5% OVA in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). The
incubation step with goat anti-rabbit-IgG-HRP conjugate or analytes
was 30 min at 37 °C. The reaction of color was at 37 °C for 5-10
min. Standard curves were obtained by plotting absorbance against the
logarithm of analyte concentration. The curves were fitted to a four-
2
2
stripped from a thin-layer chromatography (TLC) plate (<1 mm) to
1
yield 0.9 g of Cwb-6, yield 76%, which was a pale yellow gum. H
NMR (CDCl
3
): δ 1.31 [6H, s, (CH
3
)
2
C], 2.01-2.06 (1H, d, CHCO),
CO), 2.93-2.98 (2H,
), 6.31 (1H, s, CNCH), 6.82-6.85 (1H, d, dCH), 6.93-7.40
2
.22-2.28 (1H, t, dCH), 2.66-2.71 (2H, t, CH
2
t, phCH
2
parameter logistic equation: y ) {(A - D)/ [1 + (x/C) ]} + D. A is
B
(8H, m, ArH), 10.50 (1H, S, b, COOH). Following the above procedure
the maximum absorbance at no analyte present. B is the curve slop at
the inflection point. C is the concentration of analyte giving 50%
inhibition. D is the minimum absorbance at infinite concentration of
for Cwb-6, the reaction of Dwb-4 (2.6 g, 4.8 mmol) gave 0.8 g of
1
Dwb-5, yield 35%, which was a yellow liquid. H NMR (CDCl
.19-1.29 [6H, t, (CH C], 1.97-2.01 (1H, d, CHCO), 2.18-2.24
1H, t, dCHCH), 4.38 (2H, s, CH ), 6.19-6.24 (1H, d, CNCH), 6.79-
.82 (1H, d, dCH), 6.82-7.19 (4H, m, ArH).
Step G. Bromoacetic acid (1.1 g, 7.8 mmol) was added to a stirring
solution of 0.6 g of NaOH in 4.8 mL of H O in a 50 mL vessel cooled
3
): δ
1
(
6
3
)
2
the analyte. The I50 value and the limit of detection (LOD) (I ) were
15
2
found through the logistic equation.
Antiserum Characterization and Assay Optimization. After an
immune procedure, eight antisera were procured. However, the anti-
serum N-2 was hemolytic and not good to used in the immunoassay.
Titers of other seven antisera were tested against three different coating
antigens according to the procedure of Shan et al. (11). All seven
antisera showed higher titers in a homologous system than those in
the heterologous system, which was consistent with the findings of
Shan et al. (11) and Wengatz et al. (18). The titers of different antisera
varied with immnogens and coating antigens. The titer of CWB-C/
Cwb-OVA (antiserum/coating antigen) was the highest titer among all
of the tested combinations of the seven antisera with different coating
antigens. The homologous systems, whose absorbance was higher than
0.75, were tested for cyhalothrin inhibition (Table 1). The I50 values
ranged from 56 to 107 µg/L (Table 2), and the CWB-C/Cwb-OVA
was the lowest I50, which was chosen to be further optimized. Antisera
dilution and coating antigens concentrations were further optimized in
a two-dimensional titration (Table 3). The combination of antiserum
dilution/coating antigen dilution (4000/1000) giving the highest value
was selected for further assay development.
2
with an ice bath. After 3-hydroxybenzaldehyde (0.9 g, 7.4 mmol) was
added, the solution was refluxed for 2 h. The mixture was cooled with
an ice bath, and the pH was adjusted with HCl to pH 1. Filtration under
vacuum and then recrystallization in water gave 0.9 g of (3-formyl-
1
phenoxy)acetic acid (Dwb-1); yield, 68%. H NMR (CDCl
3
): δ 4.79
(
2H, s, CH
2
), 7.25-7.56 (4H, m, ArH), 9.98 (1H, s, CHO), 13.10 (1H,
s, b, COOH).
Step H. 1-(Chloromethyl)benzene (3.8 g, 30 mmol) and triethylamine
(1.3 g, 12.5 mmol) were added to a stirred solution of Dwb-1 (4.5 g,
2
5 mmol) and NaH (1.2 g, 50%) in 30 mL of dried N,N-dimethylfor-
mamide (DMF). After the solution refluxed at 150 °C for 5 h, the
solution was cooled, diluted with 100 mL of ethyl acetate, washed with
water five times, and then dried by adding anhydrous MgSO into the
4
collected organic phase overnight. Chromatographic purification on
silica (G450, ethyl acetate:petroleum ether ) 1:6) and solvent removal
gave 3.4 g of 3-formyl-phenoxy acetic acid benzyl ester (Dwb-2); yield,
1
5
1%. H NMR (CDCl
3
): δ 4.74 (2H, s, CH
2
CO), 5.25 (2H, s, phCH
2
O),
After the optimizing procedure, the conditions of the ELISA for
cyhalothrin were found, and the inhibition curve was found (Figure
1). The I50 and LOD were 37.2 and 4.7 µg/L, respectively, and the
calibration linear range was 5-500 µg/L.
7
.20-7.53 (9H, m, ArH), 9.94 (1H, s, CHO).
Step I. 3-Hydroxy-benzaldehyde (1.6 g, 14.4 mmol) and 1-choro-
4
-nitrobenzene (1.2 g, 7.7 mmol) were added to a solution of 1.4 g of