6018 J. Am. Chem. Soc., Vol. 122, No. 25, 2000
O’Neill et al.
2
+
such as Ca that also contain Brønsted acid sites upon thermal
reduced by protonation. In addition, the stability of some
nucleophiles like alkenes will be low within the strongly acidic
environment of the proton-exchanged zeolites.
46-49
activation.
This is primarily due to the fact that in the highly
acidic environment provided by acid zeolites, carbocations are
easily generated and, more importantly, are thermodynamically
stabilized to the extent that they can be readily examined by
steady-state techniques such as solid-state NMR,
diffuse reflectance,
To address these issues, we have recently developed a method
to generate reactive carbocations within nonprotic cation-
38-41
50
UV-vis
exchanged zeolites. With this technique, we can now examine
29-37
and UV-vis absorption spectros-
the reactivity of carbocations in various zeolite environments.
As well, the dynamics and mechanisms for the addition of
nucleophiles such as alcohols can be investigated without having
to take into account problems associated with the protonation
state and stability of the nucleophile. In the present work, we
describe results concerning the effect of the alkali metal
counterion, aluminum content, and framework morphology on
the absolute reactivity of the 4-methoxycumyl cation embedded
within the cavities of cation-exchanged zeolites. Our results
demonstrate for the first time that the carbocation lifetime is
indeed strongly influenced by the nature, and in particular the
nucleophilicity, of the active site within these alkali metal cation-
exchanged zeolites. We also address questions concerning the
effect of zeolite composition on the rate constant for bimolecular
reactions of carbocations with alcohol nucleophiles within the
zeolite lattice.
4
2,43
copy.
While tremendous advances in our understanding of the effect
of zeolite structure and morphology on the chemistry of
carbocations have been made from studies in acid zeolites,
studies using nonprotic alkali metal cation-exchanged zeolites
would be extremely useful in providing further insights into
the nature of the interactions between the zeolite framework
and the embedded carbocation. For example, the effect of
properties such as electrostatic field strength and cation size on
the chemistry of carbocations located within zeolite cavities can
be readily examined using alkali metal exchanged zeolites, but
not with Brønsted-acid zeolites, simply by looking at the
behavior of carbocations as a function of different exchangeable
counterions. Furthermore, the [Si-O-Al] bridges in nonprotic
cation-exchanged zeolites have distinctly enhanced Lewis base
(i.e. nucleophilic) activity that is expected to be strongly
Results
dependent on the nature of the counterion. Thus, the possibility
that reactions of unstable carbocations within zeolites involve
a direct interaction between the anionic sites on the framework
and the carbocation to generate framework bound alkoxy species
can be explored with alkali metal cation-exchanged zeolites by
looking at the absolute reactivity of the carbocation as a function
of the nature of the charge balancing cation. In addition,
nonprotic cation-exchanged zeolites are suitable media for
determining the dynamics of second-order reactions of co-
incorporated nucleophiles with carbocations. These reactions
are difficult to study in Brønsted zeolites due to the reversible
addition of nucleophiles such as water and alcohols in the highly
acidic environment, as well as the probability that the nucleo-
philicity of many common nucleophiles will be considerably
Formation of the 4-Methoxycumyl Cation in Dry Alkali
Metal Cation-Exchanged Zeolites. Laser photolysis of 4,4′-
dimethoxybicumene incorporated within the cavities of NaY
-
3
under vacuum (10 Torr) conditions leads to the formation of
5
0,51
the 4-methoxycumyl cation, λmax ) 360 nm.
The 4-meth-
oxycumyl cation is formed via rapid fragmentation of the 4,4′-
5
2-54
dimethoxybicumene radical cation
that is generated upon
laser-induced photoionization of zeolite-encapsulated 4,4′-
5
0
dimethoxybicumene, eq 1. The same laser-initiated photore-
(
31) Cano, M. L.; Cozens, F. L.; Fornes, V.; Garcia, H.; Scaiano, J. C.
J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 18145-18151.
32) Cano, M. L.; Cozens, F. L.; Garcia, H.; Vicente, M.; Scaiano, J. C.
J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 18152-18157.
33) Garcia, H.; Garcia, S.; Perez-Prieto, J.; Scaiano, J. C. J. Phys. Chem.
996, 100, 18158-18164.
34) Cozens, F. L.; Garcia, H.; Scaiano, J. C. Langmuir 1994, 10, 2246-
249.
(
(
1
2
1
(
action readily generates the 4-methoxycumyl cation within other
alkali metal cation-exchanged Y zeolites (LiY, KY, RbY, and
CsY), and within zeolites that differ in their Si/Al ratio and
framework morphology (NaX, Si/Al ) 1.2; NaMordenite, Si/
Al ) 6.5; and Naâ, Si/Al ) 18), Table 1. In each case, the
transient diffuse reflectance spectrum is dominated by the
presence of a strong absorption band centered at 360 nm, Figure
(35) Cozens, F. L.; Garcia, H.; Scaiano, J. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993,
15, 11134-11140.
(36) Cozens, F. L.; Bogdanov, R.; Regimbald, M.; Garcia, H.; Marti,
V.; Scaiano, J. C. J. Phys. Chem. B 1997, 101, 6821-6829.
37) Liu, X. L.; Iu, K.; Thomas, J. K.; He, H.; Klinowski, J. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1994, 116, 118111-11811.
38) Nicholas, J. B.; Haw, J. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 11804-
1805.
39) Xu, T.; Barich, D. H.; Goguen, P. W.; Song, W.; Wang, Z.; Nicholas,
J. B.; Haw, J. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 4025-4026.
40) Haw, J. F.; Nicholas, J. B.; Xu, T.; Beck, L. W.; Ferguson, D. B.
(
(
1
(
1
, which is the known absorption maximum for the 4-meth-
oxycumyl cation, that behaves in a manner consistent with the
formation of the carbocation. In particular, the transient species
is not affected by the addition of molecular oxygen, but decays
more rapidly in the presence of nucleophiles such as water and
alcohols (vide infra). The possibility that the transient is the
4,4′-dimethoxybicumene radical cation can be ruled out as
(
Acc. Chem. Res. 1996, 29, 259-267.
(
(
41) Tao, T.; Maciel, G. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 12889-12890.
42) Kiricsi, I.; Tasi, G.; Fejes, P.; Forster, H. J. Chem. Soc., Faraday
Trans. 1993, 89, 4221-4224.
(
7.
43) Forster, H.; Kiricsi, I.; Hannus, I. J. Mol. Struct. 1993, 296, 61-
6
(
(
(
44) van Santen, R. A.; Kramer, G. J. Chem. ReV. 1995, 95, 637-660.
45) Kazansky, V. B. Acc. Chem. Res. 1991, 24, 379-383.
(50) Cozens, F. L.; O’Neill, M.; Schepp, N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997,
119, 7583-7584.
46) Kao, H.; Grey, C. P.; Pitchumani, K.; Lakshminarasimhan, P. H.;
Ramamurthy, V. J. Phys. Chem. A 1998, 102, 5627-5639.
47) Pitchumani, K.; Joy, A.; Prevost, N.; Ramamurthy, V. Chem.
Commun. 1997, 127-128.
48) Pitchumani, K.; Lakshminarasimhan, P. H.; Turner, G.; Bakker, M.
G.; Ramamurthy, V. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 371-374.
49) Pitchumani, K.; Ramamurthy, V. Chem. Commun. 1996, 2763-
764.
(51) McClelland, R. A.; Chan, R. A.; Cozens, F. L.; Modro, A.; Steenken,
S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1991, 30, 1337-1339.
(52) Maslak, P.; Chapman, W. H., Jr. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 2647-
2656.
(53) Maslak, P. Top. Curr. Chem. 1993, 168, 1-65.
(54) Maslak, P.; Chapman, W. H., Jr. Tetrahedron 1990, 46, 2715-
2724.
(
(
(
2