Aromatic Borylation Ortho to CN
A R T I C L E S
separating steric and electronic effects. Nevertheless, a compel-
ling case can be made for steric directing effects as outlined
below.
Chart 1
1
6
There are several approaches for evaluating steric effects.
Following a course recommended by Ingold,17 Taft developed
a parameter, Es, to account for steric effects on hydrolysis and
esterification rates of o-benzoate esters.18 It was later shown
that Es values could be quantitatively related to van der Waals
1
9
radii, and values have been calculated for substituents absent
20
Table 2. Calculated Steric Enthalpies (∆∆H ) for o-Benzene
in Taft’s original work. Dubois later revised Taft’s definition,
introducing the Taft-Dubois steric parameter, E′s.2 Despite
their demonstrated utility, Es and E′s values are nonetheless
empirical, and the database of values is still limited. Alterna-
tively, the energy difference between equatorial and axial
conformers of monosubstituted cyclohexanes (the A value) has
been invoked as a measure of steric effects.22 Although the
equatorial site is indeed favored from a steric standpoint,
cyclohexane conformational energies are not immune to elec-
tronic effects. Hence, A values are poor predictors of steric
differences for electronically disparate substituents. For our
purposes, although there is no E′s value in the literature for CN,
the Es value that is typically quoted places CN between F and
Cl, which seems reasonable.23 Unfortunately, the value does
s
a
Substituents Z and Isomer Ratios for Borylation
1
1
%1:%2 calcdb
%1:%2 observedc
Z
∆∆H
s
(Z) kcal‚
mol-
H
CN
F
Cl
Br
I
CH3
OMe
SMe
NMe2
CO2Me
NHAc
CF3
0
-
-
-
-
8:92
81:19
97:3
>99:1
92:8
3.211
1.535
4.133
5.405
7.759
5.532
2.013
3.682
5.039
4.856
5.166
8.845
6:94
83:17
98:2
>99:1
98:2
31:69
66:34
96:4
94:6
96:4
>99:1
d
67:33
d
87:13
>99:1
>99:1
>99:1
>99:1
20
a
b
not appear in the primary literature that is cited. A values are
∆∆Hs(Z) values computed according to method in ref 25a. Reference
26. c GC-FID ratios from Table 1. d Isomer ratio was determined by NMR
integration.
2
4
of little help as the value for CN is lower than that of F, and
general agreement between A and Es values is poor.
Chart 2
Calculations of steric energies have been addressed using
modern computational methods. We felt that a good, albeit
crude, model for our purposes was that employed by Fujita and
co-workers for evaluating the steric effects in the acid-catalyzed
hydrolysis of o-benzamides. In essence, their approach
involves calculating the difference in enthalpies for 2-substituted
toluenes and tert-butylbenzenes relative respectively, to toluene
and tert-butylbenzene, to extract steric enthalpies, denoted as
2
5
∆
∆Hs(Z), for substituents Z, relative to that of hydrogen. For
selectivities for CO2Me, NMe2, and NHAc substituents are better
than the calculated values. To gauge whether aromatic borylation
is likely to be more sensitive to steric effects, it is instructive
to consider putative transition states for acid-catalyzed hydrolysis
of an o-benzamide (A) and Ir-catalyzed C-H activation (B) in
Chart 2.
First, transition state A more closely resembles the steric
model in Chart 1 from which ∆∆Hs(Z) values are calculated.
Moreover, transition state B should be more sensitive to the
sterics of Z because an Ir-C bond ultimately forms ortho to Z,
whereas attack by the less hindered water molecule is one carbon
removed in transition state A.
consistency, the dihedral angles for the methyl and tert-butyl
groups were constrained as shown in Chart 1.2 Since CN and
other substituents in Table 1 were not included in the pre-
vious report, we recalculated the series.26 Table 2 lists these
5a
∆
∆Hs(Z) values along with calculated and experimental ratios
27
of 2- and 3-borylated benzonitriles.
Agreement between the calculated and experimental isomer
ratios is surprisingly good. The halide data correlates best, while
(15) Comparisons to the pK
experimental results to estimate pK
a
of benzonitrile15b can be made by extrapolating
’s for fluoro- and chlorobenzene: (a)
a
Stratakis, M.; Wang, P. G.; Streitwieser, A. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 3145-
3
6
150. (b) Krizan, T. D.; Martin, J. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1983, 105, 6155-
The poorest agreement between calculated and observed
isomer ratios in Table 2 is for Z ) OMe, where the borylation
is favored at the more hindered position. Although this could
simply result from inherent deficiencies in the model, there is
reason to believe electronic effects contribute to the regiose-
lectivity. Specifically, while borylation of benzonitrile gives a
nearly statistical 2.15:1 ratio of meta to para isomers, anisole
borylation favors the meta isomer 4:1. After taking statistics
into account, this corresponds to a 2:1 preference for meta vs
157.
(
16) The following paper provides an excellent overview: White, D. P.; Anthony,
J. C.; Oyefeso, A. O. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 7707-7716.
17) Ingold, C. K. J. Chem. Soc. 1932, 1032.
(
(
(
(
(
18) Taft, R. W., Jr. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1952, 74, 3120-3128.
19) Charton, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1969, 91, 615-618.
20) Kutter, E.; Hansch, C. J. Med. Chem. 1969, 12, 647-52.
21) Macphee, J. A.; Panaye, A.; Dubois, J. E. Tetrahedron 1978, 34, 3553-
3
562.
(
22) Winstein, S.; Holness, N. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1955, 77, 5562-5578.
23) Hansch, C.; Leo, A.; Hoekman, D. Exploring QSAR: Hydrophobic,
Electronic, and Steric Constants; American Chemical Society: Washington,
DC, 1995; p 227.
(
(
24) Jensen, F. R.; Bushweller, C. H.; Beck, B. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1969, 91,
13b
para borylation. Given that CN and OMe groups are nearly
3
44-351.
(
25) A model for ortho substituent steric effects that correlates strongly with
hydrolysis of o-substituted benzamides has been reported: (a) Sotomatsu,
T.; Murata, Y.; Fujita, T. J. Comput. Chem. 1991, 12, 135-138. (b)
Sotomatsu, T.; Fujita, T. J. Org. Chem. 1989, 54, 4443-4448.
(27) Because the isomer ratios reflect differences in relative rates, values were
s s
calculated using 1:2 ) exp(-[ππH (Z) - ππH (CN)/RT]), T ) values from
Table 1. This should not be expected to reproduce the experimental values;
however, the net trend should be reflected in the data if a steric model is
appropriate.
(26) AM1 calculations were carried out on an SGI Origin 3400 supercomputer
using SPARTAN SGI, version 5.1.3, Wavefunction, Inc.: Irvine, CA.
J. AM. CHEM. SOC.
9
VOL. 127, NO. 30, 2005 10541