5
synthesis of a wide number of complex systems. Despite
the variety of procedures developed to effect such transfor-
mations, described as fundamental as the classical alkylation
of enolates, serious limitations concerning a lack of regio-
selectivity and versatility of the process or the need of
specific, usually toxic main group aryl reagents have been
Table 1. Selected R-Arylation Assays Performed on
Deoxybenzoin 3a
6
reported in many cases. However, the use of palladium
5
d,7
catalysts has emerged as a very promising alternative,
overcoming most of the problems related to this reaction,
historically difficult to conduct.
As a supporting step in this field, we wish to report an
easy, high yielding procedure for the coupling of aryl halides
4
with deoxybenzoins 3 catalyzed by palladium(II) acetate.
product
(%)a
entry
reaction conditions
t
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Pd(OAc)2, KO Bu, toluene, 90 °C, 3 hb
3a
3a
3a
3a
b
Pd(OAc)2, K2CO3, toluene, 90 °C, 23 h
Pd2(dba)3/BINAP, KO Bu, THF, 70 °C, 6 h
Pd2(dba)3/DPPF, KO Bu, THF, 70 °C, 6 h
PdCl2, K2CO3, DMF, 100 °C, 6 hd
PdCl2, Cs2CO3, DMF, 100 °C, 6 h
PdCl2/PPh3 K2CO3, DMF, 130 °C, 6 h
PdCl2/PPh3 K2CO3, DMF, 100 °C, 6 h
Pd(OAc)2/PPh3, K2CO3, o-xylene, 170 °C, 22 h
t
b,c
t
b,c
e
d,f
1a (20)
1a (24)
e
d,g
d,f,g
b,c
1a (55)
6
(29)
1a (52)
(35)
1
0
Pd(OAc)2/PPh3, Cs2CO3, DMF, 170 °C, 0.7 hb,c
6
1
1
1
2
Pd(OAc)2/PPh3, K2CO3, o-xylene, 150 °C, 9 hh
Pd(OAc)2/PPh3, Cs2CO3, DMF, 150 °C, 0.5 hh
1a (83)
1a (85)
a
Isolated yields measured on the basis of the starting amount of diaryl
ketone 3a. b 1.3 equiv of 4a, 2.5 equiv of base, and 0.02 equiv of palladium
As shown in Table 1, 1,2-bis(3,4-dimethoxyphenyl)-
catalyst were used. c 0.05 equiv of ligand was used. d 1.2 equiv of of 4a,
e
1
.2 equiv of base, and 0.05 equiv of PdCl2 were used. Complex mixtures
ethanone 3a was treated with bromobenzene 4a under the
action of different palladium catalyst/ligand/base systems in
order to promote phenylation of position 2 to give 1,2-bis-
f
of products were obtained. 1.2 equiv of iodobenzene 5 was used instead
of 4a. g 0.2 equiv of PPh3 was used. h 3a/4a/Pd(OAc)2/PPh3/Cs2CO3 ratio
was 1:1:0.02:0.08:2.5.
(
3,4-dimethoxyphenyl)-2-phenylethanone 1a.
Despite previous reports,5
d,7a-c,8
no target triaryl derivative
9
2
and co-workers have reported the PdCl -catalyzed arylation
1
a was obtained in the absence of ligand or by using bulky
of 1,2-diphenylethanone, but according to the latter results
this procedure seems to be seriously limited by the electronic
nature of the ketone precursor. Although better yields were
bidentate phosphine ligands such as BINAP or DPPF. In
addition, the use of the PdCl catalyst provided low yields
of phenylated 1a, even when iodobenzene 5 was employed
2
2 3 2 3
obtained from the system Pd(OAc) /PPh /Cs CO in both
as the haloarene reagent (Table 1, entries 6 and 8). Miura
DMF and o-xylene solvents, there still remained the draw-
7
d,e
back of the ortho-arylation side reaction to give diphe-
nylated derivative 6. This problem was ultimately overcome
by a careful choice of the temperature, reaction times, and
relative amount of bromobenzene 4a (Table 1, entries 11
and 12), thus affording 1a in good yields.
(
5) (a) Piers, E.; Oballa, R. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 5837-5860.
b) Ryan, J. H.; Stang, P. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 5061-5064. (c)
Muratake, H.; Hayakawa, A.; Natsume, M. Chem. Pharm Bull. 2000, 48,
558-1566. (d) Fox, J. M.; Huang, X.; Chieffi, A.; Buchwald, S. L. J.
(
1
Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 1360-1370 and references included therein.
(e) Deng, H. B.; Konopelski, J. P. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 3001-3004.
(6) (a) Beugelmans, R.; Boudet, B.; Quintero, L. Tetrahedron Lett. 1980,
2
1, 1943-1944. (b) Kessar, S. V. In ComprehensiVe Organic Synthesis;
Trost, B. M., Fleming, I., Semmelhack, M. F., Eds.; Pergamon Press: New
York, 1991; Vol. 4, Chapter 2.3. (c) Pinhey, J. T. Pure Appl. Chem. 1996,
6
8, 819-824. (d) Mino, T.; Matsuda, T.; Maruhashi, K.; Yamashita, M.
Organometallics 1997, 16, 3241-3242.
7) (a) Palucki, M.; Buchwald, S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119,
(
1
1
1
1108-11109. (b) Hamann, B. C.; Hartwig, J. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997,
19, 12382-12383. (c) Kawatsura, M.; Hartwig, J. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
999, 121, 1473-1478 (d) Satoh, T.; Kametani, Y.; Terao, Y.; Miura, M.;
Nomura, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 5345-5348. (e) Terao, Y.;
Kametani, Y.; Wakui, H.; Satoh, T.; Miura, M.; Nomura, M. Tetrahedron,
2
001, 57, 5967-5974. (f) Mutter, R.; Campbell, I. B.; Martin de la Neva,
E, V.; Merritt, A. T.; Wills, M. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 3284-3290. (g)
Sol e´ , D.; Vallverd u´ , L.; Peidr o´ , E.; Bonjoch, J. Chem. Commun. 2001,
Once DMF was elected as the most convenient solvent,
mainly because of its shorter required reaction time, the
1
888-1889. (h) Hamada, T.; Chieffi, A.; Åhman, J.; Buchwald, S. L. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 1261-1268.
8) (a) Mutter, R.; Martin de la Neva, E, V.; Wills, M. Chem. Commun.
000, 1675-1676. See also: (b) Shaughnessy, K. H.; Hamann, B. C.;
Hartwig, J. F. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 6546-6553.
(
2
(9) Satoh, T.; Inoh, J.-I.; Kawamura, Y.; Kawamura, Y.; Kametani, Y.;
Miura, M.; Nomura, M. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1998, 71, 2239-2246.
1592
Org. Lett., Vol. 4, No. 9, 2002