3
unsuccessful (<5% yield). We found the generation of dibromo
species 7, through the ylide from PPh3/CBr4/Et3N, to be <5% at
both 0.2 g and 1.4 g scale reaction. However, stirring the aldehyde
6 with K2CO3 in the presence of Bestmann–Ohira reagent afforded
saturation at around 120 mins. We also observed the TFA
(cyclopropene 11 was used as a TFA salt) and tetrazole ligation
product (Rt = 21 mins). Such carboxylic acid initialized tetrazole
ligation are known and has been utilized for protein ligation.39–41
the silica-gel stable terminal alkyne
8 in 78% yield.
To conclude, we have synthesized the second generation of
cyclopropene-analogs of the amino acid neurotransmitter
glutamate. They are stable in solution, on concentration, and in the
presence of high concentrations of the biological nucleophile L-
glutathione. Compared to the first generation of cyclopropene-
glutamate, inserting a methylene spacer or substituting the α-
proton with a methyl group significantly improves the stability of
cyclopropene-glutamates. This synthetic adjustment also makes
the corresponding starting material alkynes stable to silica-gel;
thereby, reducing the ten steps required for the first-generation
cyclopropene-glutamate synthesis to either four or six steps for the
second-generation. Overall, these improvements combined,
allowed us to obtain the cyclopropene-glutamate 4 and 11 in ~ 0.5
g scale quantities which is >100-fold higher than the first-
generation. Lastly, it opens the possibility of exploring additional
substituents at the α-position, e.g., fluorine, trifluoromethyl, to
study their biological properties. Future efforts in the lab are
dedicated to obtaining isolated diastereomers of the cyclopropene-
Cyclopropenation of the alkyne 8 by rhodium catalyzed addition
of ethyl diazoacetate via a syringe pump afforded the silica-gel
stable mixed-ester N,O-protected cyclopropene 9 as an inseparable
mixture of diastereomers (two major and two minor, Fig. S4 in the
ESI) in moderate yield of 29% (59% bsmr). Hydrolysis of mixed-
ester 9 under basic conditions in methanol afforded the stable free-
acid Boc-cyclopropene 10 in 84% yield. Finally, acid mediated
Boc-deprotection of 10 provided cyclopropene 11 in 80% yield as
a mixture of diastereomers. In our hands, we have obtained up to
~0.45 g of 4 from one reaction sequence. Like the cyclopropene-
analog 4, substitution of original α-proton to a methyl group also
makes this cyclopropene-glutamate analog 11 stable to
concentration, unlike the previous generation of cyclopropene-
glutamate analog.27 Like the cyclopropene-glutamate analog 4, we
determined, using an NMR-based assay, that 11 (10 mM) is also
stable to biological nucleophile reduced L-glutathione (10 mM) in
PBS at rt for at least 24 h (Fig. S5 in the ESI).
With these cyclopropene-glutamate derivatives in hand, we
tested their ability to ligate with popular bioorthogonal reagents
(Fig 3). First, we tested their ability to ligate with a tetrazine (3,6-
Di-2-pyridyl-1,2,4,5-tetrazine) via an inverse electron demand
Diels-Alder reaction by monitoring the characteristic tetrazine
absorbance peak at 520 nm. The ligation rate (second order rate
constant, k2) between Boc- and ester-protected 2 with is 0.0001 M-
1s-1 in MeCN (Fig. S6 in the ESI) which improves by 20-fold (k2 =
0.002 M-1s-1 1:1 PBS/MeOH) for cyclopropene-amino acid 4 (Fig.
S7 in the ESI) possibly due to both a relief in steric strain and
diminished electron-withdrawing ability of carboxylate relative to
the ethyl ester. Such an effect of cyclopropene-C3 substituent’s
electron-withdrawing nature by inductive effect is known.1,38
Next, we subjected the sterically strained (at C1) cyclopropene 9
to tetrazine ligation; however, we could not detect any measurable
ligation between cyclopropenes 9 (or 11) (Fig. S8–S9 in the ESI).
This suggests that inserting methylene units between the
cyclopropene-C1 and substituents at C1 improves the tetrazine
ligation.
glutamates by generating enantiomerically pure alkyne 842,43
,
resolving diastereomers at cyclopropne-C3 using a chiral reagent44
or testing the efficacy of chiral rhodium catalyst45 for mono-
substituted (at C3) cyclopropenes.
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. Bela Ruzsicska, Director of the analytical
instrumentation laboratory, Stony Brook University, and the Stony
Brook University Institute for Chemical Biology and Drug
Discovery for maintaining and acquiring high-resolution mass
spectrometry data. We thank Stony Brook University NMR
coordinators Francis Picart, Dr. James Marecek and Dr. Fang Liu
for maintaining the NMR facility. We thank Prof. Nicole S.
Sampson for access to the plate-reader for conducting kinetic
experiments, and graduate student Wang Yao in the lab of Prof.
Ming-Yu Ngai for carrying out chiral HPLC measurements.
Lastly, we thank John A. Mannone for assistance with this work.
This work was supported by a grant to S.T.L. from the National
Science Foundation 1451366.
On the other hand, photoclick chemistry presents an alternative
to utilize strained cyclopropenes such as 11 for bioorthogonal
applications.26 For this, we synthesized the 2-(4-methoxyphenyl)-
5-phenyl-2H-tetrazole and assayed its light-dependent ligation
with cyclopropene 11 using an HPLC/MS assay (Fig. S10–12 in
the ESI). We observed the expected ligation product (Rt ~18 mins),
as a mixture of diastereomers, between the cyclopropene-
glutamate 11 and the tetrazole in the first 15 mins, which reached
Supplementary Material
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
the online version, at
References and notes
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Ravasco JMJM, Monteiro CM, Trindade AF. Org Chem Front.
2017; 4: 1167–1198.
Kumar P, Laughlin ST. In Methods in Enzymology 2019; Vol. 621,
p 10.1016/bs.mie.2019.02.007.
Yu Z, Pan Y, Wang Z, Wang J, Lin Q. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl.
2012; 51: 10600–4.
An P, Lewandowski TM, Erbay TG, Liu P, Lin Q. J Am Chem Soc.
2018; 140: 4860–4868.
Yang J, Šečkutė J, Cole CM, Devaraj NK. Angew Chemie Int Ed.
2012; 51: 7476–7479.
Patterson DM, Nazarova LA, Xie B, Kamber DN, Prescher JA. J
Am Chem Soc. 2012; 134: 18638–43.
Kamber DN, Liang Y, Blizzard RJ, Liu F, Mehl RA, Houk KN,
Prescher JA. J Am Chem Soc. 2015; 137: 8388–8391.
Gahtory D, Sen R, Kuzmyn AR, Escorihuela J, Zuilhof H. Angew
Chemie Int Ed. 2018; 57: 10118–10122.
Späte A-K, Bußkamp H, Niederwieser A, Schart VF, Marx A,
Wittmann V. Bioconjug Chem. 2014; 25: 147–154.
Fig. 3. Bioorthogonal ligation of cyclopropene-glutamates with
popular bioorthogonal reagents.