Table 2 In situ oxidation–Wittig reaction on unactivated alcoholsa
In summary, we have shown for the first time that unactivated
primary alcohols can be efficiently oxidised using manganese
dioxide under in situ Wittig conditions. Similar results are
reported with ‘semi-activated’ alcohols producing a range of
synthetically useful a,b-unsaturated esters.
Substrate Product Solvent
t/h
Yield(%)
Configuration
14
16
18
20
22
a
15
17
19
21
23
toluene
toluene
toluene
CHCl3
toluene
24
24
6
20
24
80
70
86
51
< 1
> 95% E
> 95% E
> 95% E
> 99% E
We thank the EPSRC for a research fellowship (X. W.) and
research studentship (L. B.). We are also grateful to Pfizer for
additional financial support and to A. D. Campbell for carrying
out the conversion of 12 into 13.
Activated MnO2 (Aldrich, ca. 10 equiv.) was added in three equal
portions to a mixture of the alcohol and the stabilised Wittig reagent,
Ph3PCHCO2R (1.2 equiv.), in the specified solvent which was heated under
reflux for the specified time.
Notes and references
† In preliminary studies, we have shown that chromium dioxide (Mag-
trieve™) can also be used for in situ oxidation–Wittig reactions.
‡ All new compounds were fully characterised spectroscopically and by
HRMS.
alcohols. Both hexanol 16 and 1-phenylpropan-3-ol 18 fur-
nished the desired products 17 and 19, respectively, in excellent
yield. With cyclohexylmethanol 20, the expected product 21
was obtained in reduced yield (51%); it seems likely that alkyl
substitution at the b-position relative to the alcohol is responsi-
ble for the reduction in efficiency. A limitation to the process
was realised when secondary alcohols were studied. As shown
in Table 2, treatment of cyclohexanol 22 under the in situ
oxidation–Wittig conditions gave only trace amounts of the
desired enoate 23. Similar results were also observed with
pentan-3-ol and dihydrocholesterol, which both failed to yield
the corresponding enoates. These results were not unexpected
as both the oxidation of secondary alcohols and the Wittig
reactions of stabilised phosphoranes with ketones are known to
be difficult compared with the corresponding sequence com-
mencing with primary alcohols.
We have carried out preliminary studies to try to rationalise
these results. The most important point is that on treatment with
manganese dioxide in the absence of a Wittig reagent, but under
otherwise identical conditions, the primary alcohols gave only
low yields of the corresponding aldehydes: for example, after
reflux in toluene with manganese dioxide for 24 h, decanol gave
decanal in only 12% yield, unreacted alcohol accounting for the
balance of material. One possible explanation for the high
conversions observed in the presence of the stabilised phosphor-
anes is that the primary alcohols are being converted into the
corresponding aldehydes in small equilibrium quantities with
the in situ Wittig reagent immediately trapping out the
aldehyde. Alternatively it is possible that the phosphorane may
be activating the oxidant or the alcohol (or the intermediate
complex) to oxidation. Further mechanistic studies are in
progress.¶
§ Representative procedure: Activated manganese dioxide (0.3 g) was
added to a stirred solution of decanol (158 mg, 1 mmol) and ethoxy-
carbonylmethylenetriphenylphosphorane (418 mg, 1.2 mmol) in toluene
(25 ml) and the mixture was heated to reflux. Two further portions of
manganese dioxide (ca. 0.3 g each) were added to the reaction over the first
hour and then it was stirred and heated until TLC indicated that reaction was
complete (ca. 24 h). The manganese dioxide was removed by filtration
through Celite, the Celite was washed well with toluene, and the combined
organic portions were concentrated in vacuo to ca. 1–2 ml. Column
chromatography (light petroleum–Et2O 5+1) gave ethyl trans-dodec-
2-enoate (181 mg, 80%) as a colourless oil with spectroscopic data
consistent with those published (ref. 9).
¶ Addition of Ph3PO or pyridine to the manganese dioxide oxidation of
decanol under toluene reflux (24 h) increases the yield from 12 to ca.
40%.
1 A. J. Fatiadi, Synthesis, 1976, 65 and 133; Encyclopedia of Reagents for
Organic Synthesis, ed. L. A. Paquette, Wiley, Chichester, 1995, vol. 5,
p. 3229.
2 X. Wei and R. J. K. Taylor, Tetrahedron Lett., 1998, 39, 3815.
3 (a) A. G. M. Barrett, D. Hamprecht and M. Ohkubo, J. Org. Chem., 1997,
62, 9376; (b) C. C. Huang, J. Labelled Compd. Radiopharm., 1987, 24,
675; (c) D. Crich and X. Mo, Synlett, 1999, 67.
4 S. Shuto, S. Niizuma and A. Matsuda, J. Org. Chem., 1998, 63, 4489.
5 F. Cominetti, A. Deagostino, C. Prandi and P. Venturello, Tetrahedron,
1998, 54, 14603.
6 T. Morikawa, Y. Washio, S. Harada, R. Hanai, T. Kayashita, H. Nemoto,
M. Shiro and T. Taguchi, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1, 1995, 271.
7 H. Priepke, R. Bruckner and K. Harms, Chem. Ber., 1990, 123, 555.
8 S. B. Davies and M. A. McKervey, Tetrahedron Lett., 1999, 40, 1229.
9 J. A. Elix, D. A. Venables and A. W. Archer, Aust. J. Chem., 1994, 47,
1345.
Communication 9/03980E
1338
Chem. Commun., 1999, 1337–1338