J.-S. Yoo et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 16 (2006) 4889–4892
4891
1
Figure 2. Key H– H COSY, HMBC, and NOE correlations of
1
macrolactin N.
1
3
the (R)-and (S)-MTPA ester of 1 by modified Mosher
1
4
method, which was the same as that of C-7 of macrolac-
1
Figure 3. The mechanism of inhibition of Staphylococcus aureus PDF
by 1 with respect to f-MAS. The values are represented as means ± SD
in triplicate.
5
tin A. Thus, the structure of 1 was determined as shown
in Figure 1.
Compound 1 is a new derivative dehydroxylated at
1
6
with a MIC (lg/ml) of 100, while inhibiting weaker bac-
terial growth against S. aureus and B. subtilis with a
MIC50 (lg/ml) of 100, respectively.
C-13 of macrolactin F. A class of macrolactin is a
4-membered lactone compound and 15 macrolactin
2
compounds such as macrolactins A-M, 7-O-suc-
cinoylmacrolactin A, and 7-O-succinoylmacrolactin F
1
5–17
In summary, macrolactin N is a new 24-membered lac-
tone compound isolated from B. subtilis. Macrolactin
N strongly inhibited S. aureus PDF and also showed
antibacterial activity against E. coli, B. subtilis, and
S. aureus. Macrolactin N may serve as a new class of
PDF inhibitors for development of antibacterials.
have been reported so far.
Compound 1, however,
is the first macrolactin dehydroxylated at C-13. Macro-
lactin compounds have been isolated from an unclassifi-
able deep-sea bacterium, Actinomadura sp., or Bacillus
sp. They have been reported to exhibit weak antibacte-
rial activity against S. aureus and B. subtilis and antiviral
1
5–17
activities.
Acknowledgments
The inhibitory activity of 1 against S. aureus PDF was
1
8
evaluated according to our previously reported method
with some modifications as follows; assays contained
0 mM Hepes (pH 7.5), 10 mM NaCl, 20 lg/ml bovine
We express our thanks to Ms. Eun-Hee Kim at Korea
Basic Science Institute for NMR measurements (Avance
00, Bruker). This work was supported by the 21C
Frontier Microbial Genomics and Application Center
Program, Ministry of Science and Technology (Grant
MG05-0308-3-0), Republic of Korea.
5
8
serum albumin, 2 mM N-formylmethionine-alanine-
serine (f-MAS), 20 lM NAD, 0.00025 U formate dehy-
drogenase, and 54.3 nM S. aureus PDF in half-area,
9
6-well microtiter plates. Compound dissolved in
dimethylsulfoxide was added to each well. The rate of
increase in the amount of NADH in each reaction well
was measured at 340 nm at 30 ꢁC by a microtiter ELISA
reader using SOFTmax PRO software (Molecular
Devices, California, USA). The inhibitory activity was
calculated by the following formula: % of inhibi-
tion = 100 · [1 À (rate in the presence of compound/rate
in the untreated control)].
References and notes
1
2
3
4
. Bax, R.; Mullan, N.; Verhoef, J. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents
000, 16, 51.
. Miesel, L.; Greene, J.; Black, T. A. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2003,
, 442.
. Yuan, Z.; Trias, J.; White, R. J. Drug Discov. Today 2001,
, 954.
. Waller, A. S.; Clements, J. M. Curr. Opin. Drug Discov.
Devel. 2002, 5, 785.
5. Jain, R.; Chen, D.; White, R. J.; Patel, D. V.; Yuan, Z.
2
4
6
Compound 1 inhibited S. aureus PDF in a dose-depen-
dent manner with an IC50 (lM) value of 7.5 lM. The
inhibition pattern of PDF by 1 with respect to the sub-
strate, f-MAS, was examined with a Lineweaver–Burk
plot analysis. As shown in Figure 3, 1 exhibited compet-
itive inhibition with f-MAS and its K and K values for
Curr. Med. Chem. 2005, 12, 1607.
6
. Chen, D.; Yuan, Z. Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs 2005, 14,
107.
7. Hu, X.; Ngujen, K. T.; Verlinde, C. L. M. J.; Hol, W. G.
1
i
m
À6
À4
PDF were 2.16 · 10 M and 1.8 · 10 M, respectively.
The antibacterial activity of 1 against S. aureus
J.; Pei, D. J. Med. Chem. 2003, 46, 3771.
8
9
. Howard, M. H.; Cenizal, T.; Gutteridge, S.; Hanna, W. S.;
Tao, Y.; Totrov, M.; Wittenbach, V. A.; Zheng, Y.
J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47, 6669.
. Davies, S. J.; Ayscough, A. P.; Beckett, R. P.; Bragg, R.
A.; Clements, J. M.; Doel, S.; Grew, C.; Launchbury, S.
B.; Perkins, G. M.; Pratt, L. M.; Smith, H. K.; Spavold, Z.
(
(
RN4220), B. subtilis (KCTC 1021), and Escherichia coli
KCTC 1924) was examined using microdilution broth
method. Compound 1 showed stronger antibacterial
activity against E. coli than S. aureus and B. subtilis.
Compound 1 inhibited bacterial growth against E. coli