a
Table 1 Addition of acid is necessary for reduction of imine 6a by 2 .
b
c
Time/h Conversion (%) Ee (%)
d
Entry Acid
pK
a
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1
1
1
1
a
HCOOH
HCOOH
3.75
3.75
0.5
1
23
1
23
1
23
1
23
1
96
96
. 99
. 99
39
73
39
78
. 99
. 99
26
29
—
91
85
78
75
69
84
94
89
80
78
82
80
—
HBF
HBF
4
4
0.5
CF
CF
3
COOH 0.52
COOH 0.52
Scheme 2 Stoichiometric reaction between 2 and imine 6 does neither
3
form any complex, nor reduce the substrate.
CH COOH 4.76
3
CH COOH 4.76
3
Sc(OTf)
Sc(OTf)
3
0
1
2
3
3
23
23
coordinates to 3, formed from 2, to give a stable Ru–amine
complex.{ To investigate this complexation we mixed stoichio-
metric amounts of 2 with an imine. To our surprise, neither a Ru–
amine complex, nor free amine was observed (Scheme 2, Path A).
PhCOOH
4.2
Me
—
3
COOH 5.03
—
23
e
31
Unless otherwise noted, 35 mmol of imine was mixed with acid
1 equiv. followed by 2 2 equiv. in CH Cl under argon. The reaction
mixture was worked up with 2 M NaOH, extracted with CH
Both the chemical shifts and the integrals (400 MHz, CD
Cl ) of
2 2
2
2
2
b
Cl
2
,
the hydride signal of 2 at d 25.87 (s, 1 H) and the benzyl
hydrogens at d 4.66 (s, 2 H) and methyl group at d 2.29 (s, 3 H) of
imine 6a remained unchanged. In a similar experiment with imine
dried (Na
2
SO
4
)
values apply to dilute aqueous solutions and are taken from ref. 19.
and purified by bulb-to-bulb distillation. pK
a
c
d
Conversion determined by NMR.
determined by GC analysis. 4 equiv. of 2 were used.
(S)-configuration, ee
e
6b the signals of the methyl groups of the imine at d 3.83 (s, 3 H),
d 3.29 (s, 3 H) and d 2.19 (s, 3H) also remained unchanged. The
singlet of ferrocene at d 4.12 was used as an internal standard.
Even with a large excess of imine (10 equiv.) no reaction
between hydride 2 and the imine occurred after 12 hours
The Swedish Research Council is gratefully acknowledged for
financial support.
(Scheme 2, path A).{,§ This is in sharp contrast to the reaction
of ketones, where treatment of 2 with a tenfold excess of acetone
Notes and references
(
R 5 Me Scheme 2, path B) instantaneously gave the 16 electron
6
species 3 and 2-propanol. Since formic acid/triethylamine is used
{
The corresponding Ru–amine complexes of bifunctional catalyst 4 have
recently been reported by us and Casey, see refs. 16 and 17.
Slow decomposition of the hydride was detected, but this also occurred in
for catalytic transfer hydrogenation of imines we argued that the
activation barrier is too high to overcome without acidic activation
of the imine by protonation. This was supported by the fact that
addition of one equivalent of formic acid to the reaction mixture
afforded the corresponding amine (Table 1, entry 1).
{
the absence of imine.
§ To prove that this was not due to unfavorable thermodynamics, attempts
were made to study the reverse reaction by mixing the coordinatively
2 2
unsaturated 16 electron species 3 and amine 7a in CD Cl . A tenfold excess
1
of amine did not produce any detectable amounts (by H NMR) of
dehydrogenation products.
To confirm that the formic acid was not working as hydrogen
donor we performed the hydrogenation of imines 6 by 2 with
different Brønsted acids and one Lewis acid. Interestingly, most of
these acids worked well to promote the hydrogenation. The use of
tetrafluoroboric acid afforded the amine in excellent yield (Table 1,
entry 3). Trifluoroacetic as well as acetic acid gave high yields after
prolonged reaction times (Table 1, entries 6 and 8). Scandium
triflate, which has been used for activation of imines in reductive
1 A. N. Collins, G. N. Sheldrake and J. Crosby, Editors, Chirality
in Industry II: Developments in the Commercial Manufacture and
Applications of Optically Active Compounds, Wiley, Chichester, 1997.
2
J. S. M. Samec, J.-E. B a¨ ckvall, P. G. Andersson and P. Brandt, Chem.
Soc. Rev., 2006, 35, 237; S. Gladiali and E. Alberico, Chem. Soc. Rev.,
2006, 35, 226; H.-U. Blaser, C. Malan, B. Pugin, F. Spindler,
H. Steiner and M. Studer, Adv. Synth. Catal., 2003, 345, 103;
S. E. Clapham, A. Hadzovic and R. H. Morris, Coord. Chem. Rev.,
20
amination, also gave an excellent yield in the reaction between
imine 6a and catalyst 2 (Table 1, entry 9). This further supports the
proposal that the role of the acid is to activate the imine. Only the
sterically hindered benzoic and pivalic acid gave moderate yields in
this transformation (Table 1, entries 11 and 12). The striking
difference when using no acid is still evident, since no amine is
formed, even after 31 hours (Table 1, entry 13). All yields and ee
values are comparable to those of the catalytic version (cf. 72%
2
004, 248, 2201.
3 R. Noyori, M. Yamakawa and S. Hashiguchi, J. Org. Chem., 2001, 66,
931.
G. Z. Wang and J.-E. B a¨ ckvall, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1992,
80.
7
4
5
6
9
N. Uematsu, A. Fujii, S. Hashiguchi, T. Ikariya and R. Noyori, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 1996, 118, 4916.
K.-J. Haack, S. Hashiguchi, A. Fujii, T. Ikariya and R. Noyori, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1997, 36, 285.
R. Noyori and S. Hashiguchi, Acc. Chem. Res., 1997, 30, 97.
E. Mizushima, M. Yamaguchi and T. Yamagishi, J. Mol. Catal. A:
Chem., 1999, 148, 69; J. S. M. Samec and J.-E. B a¨ ckvall, Chem.–Eur. J.,
7
8
5
yield and 77% ee after 36 h).
Based on our studies, we conclude that the concerted pathway
7,13
2002, 8, 2955.
previously reported (Fig. 2) does not operate for imines. Acidic
activation of the imine is required and further studies on how the
protonated imine is hydrogenated by hydride 2 are currently
underway.
9
J. Mao and D. C. Baker, Org. Lett., 1999, 1, 841; M. Albrecht,
R. H. Crabtree, J. Mata and E. Peris, Chem. Commun., 2002, 32.
0 J. R. Miecznikowski and R. H. Crabtree, Polyhedron, 2004, 23,
1
2857.
2
772 | Chem. Commun., 2006, 2771–2773
This journal is ß The Royal Society of Chemistry 2006