Please do not adjust margins
ChemComm
Page 4 of 5
COMMUNICATION
Journal Name
apoptosis cells in a dose-dependent manner, which was much
greater than those of TPP-CSeD or X-Ray alone (Fig. S9). These
results revealed that under X-Ray irradiation, TPP-CSeD trigged
cancer cells death mainly through inducting apoptosis and a
small amount of G2/M phase cell arrest. It’s well known that
mitochondrial dysfunction acts as critical role in inducing
apoptotic.18 Hence, we used mitochondrial probe to
dynamically observe the morphological changes of
mitochondria in real time. As shown in Fig. 4d and Fig. S7d, the
mitochondria in the control group extended to the whole
cytoplasm in a filamentous manner. But in the Caski and HUVEC
cells treated with TPP-CSeD and X-Ray, obvious mitochondrial
fragmentation and rupture were observed. These results
commonly suggested that the combination of TPP-CSeD and X-
Ray irradiation plays an important role in inducing
mitochondrial dysfunction and triggering cell apoptosis. Many
studies reported that caspases, as a family of proteases, plays
an important role in initiating and executing apoptosis.19
Therefore, we next examined the caspase activities including
caspase-3/8/9 trigged by different concentrations of TPP-CSeD
and X-Ray in combination. A dose-dependent manner increase
in caspase 3/8/9 activities were observed after the treatment
(Fig. 4b and S7b). Western blot analysis further showed that
treatment of Caski cells with TPP-CSeD and X-Ray also caused
dose-dependent increase in activation of caspase-3, caspase-8
and caspase-9 (Fig. S10). Taken together, apoptosis mediated
by TPP-CSeD and X-Ray is mainly dependent on caspase
pathway, mainly through death receptor-mediated and
mitochondrial-mediated pathways.
In summary, TPP-labile CSeD prodrug was successfully
designed and synthesized by using -OH group from CA-4 and -
COOH group from azide SeD via esterification process. TPP
could serve as a trigger to react with CSeD for releasing SeD and
CA-4 via Staudinger reaction, thus achieving bioorthogonal
cleavage reactions. Compound CSeD showed higher safety in
the blood circulation compared with CA-4 and the anticancer
efficiency of TPP-CSeD was also highly superior to that of CA-4.
Moreover, TPP-CSeD displayed excellent radiosentization
properties and enhanced the inhibition effect for cancer cells
migration, invasion and angiogenesis. The mechanism of cell
death suggested TPP-CSeD with X-Ray illumination induced
mitochondrial dysfunction and activated of caspase activities,
thus triggering cell apoptosis. Taken together, this study
provides a new approach for the rational design of late-stage
activation multiple chemotherapeutic prodrugs that showed
bioorthogonal bioactivity enhancement for simultaneous
anticancer and antiangiogenesis therapy.
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that there are no confliDctOsI:o1f0i.n10te3r9e/Dst0.CC05498D
Notes and references
1. E. M. Sletten, C. R. Bertozzi, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48,
6974-6998.
2. C. Bednarek, I. Wehl, N. Jung, U. Schepers, S. Brase. Chem.
Rev. 2020, 120, 4301-4354.
3. N. K. Devaraj, ACS Cent. Sci. 2018, 4, 952-969;
4. E. M. Sletten, C. R. Bertozzi, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48,
6974-6998.
5. J. Li, P. R. Chen, Nature Chem. Biol. 2016, 12, 129-137.
6. P. Klan, T. Solomek, C. G. Bochet, A. Blanc, R. Givens, M.
Rubina, V. Popik, A. Kostikov, J. Wirz. Chem. Rev. 2013, 113,
119-191.
7. J. Li, J. Yu, J. Zhao, J. Wang, S. Zheng, S. Lin, L. Chen, M. Yang,
S. Jia, X. Zhang, P. R. Chen. Nat. Chem. 2014, 6, 352;
8. M. Tomas-Gamasa, M. Martinez-Calvo, J. R. Couceiro, J. L.
Mascarenas, Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 12538;
9. X. Wang, Y. Liu, X. Fan, J. Wang, W. S. C. Ngai, H. Zhang, J. Li,
G. Zhang, J. Lin, P. R. Chen, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141,
17133-17141.
10 H. Zhang, Y. Ma, X-L. Sun, Chem. Commun. 2009, 3032-3034;
11. M. Azoulay, G. Tuffin, W. Sallem, J.-C. Florent, Bioorg. Med.
Chem. Lett. 2006, 16, 3147-3149.
12. Z. S. Seddigi, M. S. Malik, A. P. Saraswati, S. A. Ahmed, A. O.
Babalghith, H. A. Lamfon, A. Kamal, Med. Chem. Commun.
2017, 8, 1592.
13. C. M. Weekley, H. H. Harris, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2013, 42, 8870.
14. Huang W., Chen Z., Hou L., Feng P., Li Y., & Chen T. Dalton
Transactions, 2020, 49(33), 11556-11564.
15. M. Bio, P. Rajaputra, I. Lim, P. Thapa, B. Tienabeso, R. E. Hurst,
Y. You, RSC Chem. Commun., 2017, 53, 1884-1887.
16. G. Dark, S. A. Hill, V. E. Prise, G. M. Tozer, G. R. Pettie, Cancer
Res., 1997, 57, 1829-1834.
17. C. Dumontet, M. A. Jordan, Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2010, 9, 790–
803.
18. L. He, H. Lai, T. Chen, Biomaterials, 2015, 51, 30-42.
19. C. Zhang, Q. Hu, G. Feng, R. Zhang, Y. Yuan, X. Lu, B. Liu, Chem.
Sci., 2015 6(8), 4580-4586.
This work was supported by Natural Science Foundation of
China (21602078, 21877049), the Pearl River talent program of
Guangdong Province (Youth top-notch talent, 2017GC010302),
Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation
(2019A1515011743), National Program for Support of Top-
notch Young Professionals (W02070191), the Fundamental
Research Funds for the Central Universities.
4 | J. Name., 2012, 00, 1-3
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 20xx
Please do not adjust margins