3
54
J.-T. Li and M.-X. Sun
Table 2. Condensation of barbituric acid with aromatic aldehydes with and without the use of ultrasound
A, stirring without ultrasound; B, ultrasound irradiation
◦
◦
Compound
Ar
Time [min]
Yield [%]
mp [ C]
mp [ C] (Lit.)
A
B
A
B
8]
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
i
4-CH3OC6H4
2-CH3OC6H4
4-HOC6H4
3-CH3O-4-HOC6H3
4-ClC6H4
3-ClC6H4
4-CH3C6H4
C6H5
4-(CH3)2NC6H4
2-HO-3-CH3OC6H3
3,4-(OCH2O)C6H3
4-NO2C6H4
20
25
25
20
40
40
25
30
30
20
20
40
5
5
5
98
98
97
93
96
41
88
62
92
91
96
15
99
97
98
98
94
68
95
61
98
99
97
20
296–298
266–268
>350
307–310
300–301
267–268
277–279
267–268
280–283
>350
298–300[
[
7]
270–272
>350[
9]
9]
6]
8]
8]
8]
9]
4
309–313[
301–302[
10
10
10
10
5
5
5
15
[
274–278
278–280[
270–272[
[
282–284
10]
j
k
l
>350[
[
3]
326
306–308
320
307–310[
8]
gave a 95% yield of the same product within 10 nm. It is clear
that ultrasound can accelerate the condensation of some aromatic
aldehydes with barbituric acid.
From the results above the optimum reaction conditions
were chosen: aromatic aldehyde (1, 1 mmol), barbituric acid
lower than the level of the water. Observation of the surface of
the reaction solution during vertical adjustment of vessel depth
will show the optimum position by the point at which maximum
surface disturbance occurs. The reaction temperature was con-
trolled by the addition or removal of water from the ultrasonic
bath.
(
2, 1 mmol), silicotungstic acid (0.005 mmol), and water (3 mL).
Under these reaction conditions, a series of experiments for the
synthesis of 5-arylidene barbituric acids was carried out. Good
yields were obtained for all systems, except for 3f and 3l, within
General Procedure
Aldehyde(1, 1 mmol), barbituricacid(2, 1 mmol), SiO2·12WO3·
2
0–40 min (Table 2).
24H2O (0.005 mmol), and water (3 mL) were mixed in a 25 mL
When 4-aminoacetophenone, 4-nitroacetophenone, or 4-
round-bottomed flask.The reaction mixture was either stirred, or
irradiated in the water bath of an ultrasonic cleaner, at room tem-
perature for the period as indicated in Table 2. After completion
of the reaction, the reaction mixture was filtered, washed with
boiling H2O and then washed with EtOH, affording the known
products (3a–3l). The authenticity of the products was estab-
lished by spectroscopic data and by comparing their melting
methoxyacetophenone was used as a substrate, no product was
obtained despite the use of stirring, ultrasonic irradiation or
extending the reaction time. This indicates that the method has
some limitations with respect to some aromatic ketones, pos-
sibly due to steric hindrance around the carbonyl group which
inhibits the condensation.
The condensation of barbituric acid with aliphatic (cyclic)
ketones such as acetone, butanone, and cyclohexanone was also
carried out using either ultrasound radiation or stirring. In both
cases no reaction product was obtained.
[3,5–10]
points with literature values.
Acknowledgement
The project was supported by Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province
We have shown that the method presented here represents an
efficient procedure in terms of high yield, mild reaction condi-
tions, and easy workup. In addition, compared with the use of
stirring, ultrasonic irradiation can reduce the reaction time.
In conclusion, we have found a practical procedure for the
preparation of 5-arylidene barbituric acids from some aromatic
aldehydes and barbituric acid, catalyzed by silicotungstic acid
(
B2006000969), China.
References
[
1] (a) J. T. Bojarski, J. L. Mokrosz, H. J. Barton, M. H. Palu-
chowska, Adv. Heterocycl. Chem. 1985, 38, 229. doi:10.1016/S0065-
2725(08)60921-6
(b) B. S. Jursic, J. Heterocycl. Chem. 2001, 38, 655 and reference
therein.
(
SiO2·12WO3·24H2O).
[
2] (a)J. D. Figueroa-Villar, E. R. Cruz, L. N. DosSantos, Synth. Commun.
1
(
992, 22, 1159. doi:10.1080/00397919208021101
b) K. Tanaka, X. Chen, F. Yoneda, Tetrahedron 1988, 44, 3241.
doi:10.1016/S0040-4020(01)85957-3
Experimental
Materials and Measurements
Liquid aldehydes were purified by distillation before use. Melt-
ing points were uncorrected. IR spectra were recorded on a
Bio-Rad FTS-40 spectrometer (KBr). H NMR spectra were
measured on a Bruker AVANCE-400 (400 MHz) spectrome-
ter using TMS as internal standard and DMSO as solvent.
Mass spectra were determined on a VG-7070E spectrometer
[3] G. Alcerreca, R. Sanabria, R. Miranda, G. Arroyo, J. Tamariz,
F. Delgado, Synth. Commun. 2000, 30, 1295. doi:10.1080/
00397910008087151
1
[
[
[
4] S. K. Dewan, R. Singh, Synth. Commun. 2003, 33, 3081.
doi:10.1081/SCC-120022485
5] Y. Wan, J. Chen, Q. Y. Zhuang, D. Q. Shi, J. Xuzhou Normal Univ.
2
004, 22, 47.
6] X. Z. Hu, L. G. Hua, Chin. J. Nanjing Norm. Univ. (Nat. Sci. Ed.)
989, 12, 41.
(
EI, 70 eV). Sonication was performed in a Shanghai Branson-
BUG25–06 ultrasonic cleaner (with a frequency of 25 kHz and
a nominal power of 250W). The reaction flask was located in
the cleaner, where the surface of the reactant solution is slightly
1
[7] J. C. Li, G. S. Li, C. Wang, S. Feng, Chin. J. Hebei Univ. (Nat. Sci.
Ed.) 2001, 21, 269.