G. Bai et al. / Catalysis Communications 29 (2012) 114–117
115
determined by inductively coupled plasma (ICP) on a Thermo VISTA-
MPX spectrometer. BET surface areas and total pore volume of the
catalysts were identified using a Micromeritics Tristar II 3020 surface
reactions [11], we speculated that microwave radiation favors genera-
tion of 3-acetylindole by reducing side reactions as a consequence of
shortening the reaction time. In comparison, the conversion of indole
to and the selectivity for 3-acetylindole are only 76.2% and 73.4% over
pure tungstophosphoric acid under microwave radiation. So there
must be some synergistic effect between tungstophosphoric acid and
Hβ zeolite to cause the PW-Hβ zeolite to have the highest activity in
this reaction. Thus, PW-Hβ zeolite was chosen as the appropriate catalyst
for further investigation and microwave radiation was selected as the
best heating method for this reaction.
3
area and pore analyzer. NH temperature-programmed desorption
(
NH -TPD) experiments were performed on a TP-5000 instrument with
3
a thermal conductivity detector. Fourier Transform Infrared Spectrometer
after adsorption of pyridine (Py-IR) was recorded using a Bruker EQUI-
NOX55 spectrometer coupled to a conventional high vacuum system.
2
.3. Catalyst activity test
Moreover, a service life test was performed under the optimum reac-
tion conditions. It was found that the regenerated catalyst showed stable
catalytic activity in five subsequent cycles. The conversion of indole
remained above 95.0% and the selectivity to 3-acetylindole was up to
78.0% during the whole test. Thus, PW-Hβ zeolite was proven to have
good stability in this reaction.
Friedel–Crafts acylations of indole were carried out by two methods.
In a typical run of conventional heating, 2.5 mmol indole, 5 mmol acetic
anhydride, and 0.05 g zeolite were charged to a 25 mL round flask and
reacted at 120 °C for 3 h with stirring. The microwave-assisted reactions
were performed on a CEM Discover S-class. In a typical run, 2.5 mmol
indole, 5 mmol acetic anhydride, and 0.05 g zeolite were charged to a
A possible mechanism for indole acylation is proposed based on the
GC-MS results and previous literature [12] (Scheme 1). 3-Acetylindole is
the initial product as a result of preferential acetylation of the indole nu-
cleus. Further N-acetylation of 3-acetylindole will yield 1,3-diacetylindole
as the major by-product. On the other hand, if N-acylation occurs first, the
resultant N-acetylindole produced is resistant to further C-acylation
giving N-acetylindole as another possible by-product. Furthermore,
considering the polydentate strong nucleophilic nature of indole, compet-
ing side reactions such as Mannich-type indole oligomerizations, acyla-
tion of oligomerized products, and the less common formation of di-
indolylmethanes or the oxidation products are also possible competing
pathways that could reduce the yield of the desired 3-acetylindole.
Although it is documented that the 3-position of the indole nucleus is
most susceptible to electrophilic attack, the selectivity for 3-acetylindole
was still low under the conventional heating method. In contrast, micro-
wave radiation is shown to favor 3-acetylation of the indole nucleus,
reducing formation of 1,3-diacetylindole both over parent and acid mod-
ified zeolites. Exactly why this should be so is not absolutely clear to us
but we suggest that the increased rate of reaction under microwave
heating conditions simply reduces the amount of side reactions occurring,
as also reported by Kappe et al. [13].
1
0 mL microwave vessel equipped with a standard cap. After the vessel
was sealed, the sample was irradiated at 120 °C for 8 min, which was
plotted in Synergy software applying the power of 150 W or 200 W.
Reaction mixtures were analyzed by a gas chromatography using a
30 m SE-54 capillary column. The product structures were confirmed
1
using GC-MS (Agilent 5975C) and H NMR (Bruker Avance III 600 MHz).
3
. Results and discussion
3
.1. Catalyst selection
Friedel–Crafts acylation of indole leads to 1,3-diacylated material as
the major product, due to the rapid N-acylation of the 3-acylated inter-
mediate, so the selection of a suitable catalyst is crucial to the highly
efficient monoacylation of indole [10]. Therefore, we first chose several
different kinds of parent zeolites to investigate their catalytic activities
in this reaction and the results are listed in Table 1. Among the zeolites
studied, Hβ zeolite was found to show the best catalytic performance.
Noticeably, the reaction rate increased significantly when the reaction
was carried out in the presence of microwave radiation, compared
with conventional heating. With the combination of microwave radia-
tion and Hβ zeolite, the conversion of indole can achieve 77.8% and the
selectivity to 3-acetylindole is 70.7%, but still below our expectation.
Considering the benefits of acid modification, a series of acid modi-
fied Hβ zeolites were prepared and investigated under the same reaction
conditions (Table 2). As can be seen, some acid modified zeolites, espe-
cially a PW-Hβ zeolite, exhibited higher activities than parent Hβ zeolite.
Particularly, the conversion of indole and the selectivity to 3-acetylindole
are 100% and 82.9% over the PW-Hβ zeolite under microwave radiation
at 200 W. Combined with the mechanism of microwave-assisted organic
3.2. Catalyst characterization
XRD patterns of Hβ and PW-Hβ zeolites are shown in Fig. 1. The char-
acteristic diffraction peaks of PW-Hβ zeolite were at about 7.5° and 22.5°,
just like parent Hβ zeolite, indicating that no obvious structural changes
occurred under this acid treatment. Moreover, a characteristic diffraction
3
peak of WO was also detected at about 25° in the curve of PW-Hβ
Table 2
Effect of different acid modified zeolites and heating methods on Friedel–Crafts acylation
Table 1
of indole.
Effect of different zeolites and heating methods on Friedel–Crafts acylation of indole.
Catalyst Heating Conversion Selectivity (%)
method (%)
Catalyst
Heating Conversion Selectivity (%)
method (%)
1
-acetylindole 3-acetylindole 1,3-diacetylindole
1
-
3-
1,3-
HCl-Hβ
OA-Hβ
TA-Hβ
PW-Hβ
A
B
A
B
A
B
A
B
C
A
B
99.8
99.1
97.7
93.6
47.0
98.6
100
100
100
9.6
6.8
7.7
9.0
9.9
12.6
7.8
35.4
9.9
67.9
59.4
76.7
65.7
70.0
68.2
71.7
28.7
82.9
73.4
25.6
15.7
23.9
10.0
17.0
1.4
acetylindole acetylindole diacetylindole
MCM-41
ZSM-5(38)
ZSM-5(50)
HY
A
B
A
B
A
B
A
B
A
B
30.7
35.5
7.7
12.3
17.8
17.1
36.9
43.8
77.8
76.5
15.1
26.4
13.9
27.8
13.1
43.2
14.7
22.9
9.3
64.0
42.4
44.2
30.3
55.9
32.7
66.6
46.7
70.7
54.5
13.4
15.1
16.4
5.0
17.9
11.0
12.2
17.9
14.0
13.7
8.4
17.4
27.0
0.9
13.9
16.5
PW
76.2
93.8
7.6
33.8
Hβ
6.1
Reaction conditions: indole (2.5 mmol), acetic anhydride (5 mmol), catalyst (0.05 g),
120 °C.
Microwave heating 8 min at 150 W.
Conventional heating 3 h.
Microwave heating 8 min at 200 W.
Reaction conditions: indole (2.5 mmol), acetic anhydride (5 mmol), catalyst (0.05 g),
20 °C.
A
1
A
B
Microwave heating 8 min at 150 W.
Conventional heating 3 h.
B
C