192
J. Chu et al. / Inorganica Chimica Acta 410 (2014) 191–194
Table 2
stirring. The resulting solution was neutralized with sodium ace-
tate (15%). The yellow product precipitated and then was filtered.
Finally, the product was purified by crystallization from ethyl ace-
tate to obtain a yellow crystalline solid. The yield was 75%. Anal.
Calc. for C12H9Cl2N3: C, 54.16; H, 3.41; N, 15.79. Found: C, 54.65;
H, 3.40; N, 15.37%. 1H NMR (CDCl3) d 10.14 (s, 1H), 7.66 (d,
J = 2.0 Hz, 2H), 7.39 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 2H), 7.26 (t, J = 2.0 Hz, 2H), 7.10
Selected bond distances (Å) and angles for complex 1.
Pd(1)–Pd(1–2)
Pd(1)–N(3–2)
N(1)–N(2)
N(1)–N(2)–N(3)
N(1)–Pd(1)–Pd(1–2)
N(2)–N(1)–Pd(1)
2.4228(3)
Pd(1)–N(1)
Pd(1)–Cl(2–2)
N(2)–N(3)
N(1)–Pd(1)–N(3–2)
N(3–2)–Pd1–Pd(1–2) 87.671(52)
2.0311(19)
2.4939(6)
1.3044(28)
173.497(80)
2.0125(20)
1.2969(24)
114.937(4)
85.828(51)
126.358(48) N(2)–N(3)–Pd(1–2)
125.187(51)
104.272(52)
(t, J = 2.0 Hz, 2H). UV–Vis [CH2Cl2, kmax/nm (
e
/L molÀ1 cmÀ1)]:
Cl(2–2)–Pd(1)–N(3–2) 82.231(52)
Cl(2–2)–Pd(1)–N(1)
241 (1.65 Â 104), 355 (1.91 Â 104).
3. Results and discussion
2.2.2. Synthesis of complex 1
3.1. Synthesis and characterization
To a solution, containing 1,3-bis[(2-chloro)benzene]triazene
(HL) (0.28 g, 1 mmol) and triethylamine (0.10 g, 1 mmol) in aceto-
nitrile/tetrahydrofuran (20 mL, 1:1), [Pd(CH3CN)4]Cl2 (0.34 g,
1.0 mmol) was added and the mixture was stirred for 15 min.
The solution was allowed to slowly evaporate, affording deep red
crystals, which were collected and dried in vacuo (46.8%). Anal.
Calc. for C24H16Pd2Cl4N6: C, 39.27; H, 2.20; N, 11.45. Found: C,
38.78; H, 2.17; N, 11.21%. 1H NMR (CDCl3) d 7.31 (d, J = 2.0 Hz,
4H), 7.27 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 4H), 7.14 (t, J = 2.0 Hz, 4H), 7.00 (t,
In the presence of Et3N, the reaction of 1,3-bis[(2-chloro)ben-
zene]triazene (HL) and [Pd(CH3CN)4]Cl2 affords red crystals of
complex 1 in 46.8% yield. During the course of the synthesis of 1,
the Pd(II) was reduced by one electron to Pd(I) ion. At this time,
we do not have experimental data concerning this process. It is
well-known, however, that the reduction of Pd(II) starting materi-
als to Pd(I) is common [25]. Palladium(I), which has the d9 config-
uration, is expected to exhibit paramagnetic behavior. Complex 1,
however, is diamagnetic and amenable to NMR analysis (Figs. S1
and S2). It is assumed that the d9 Pd(I) centers are spin-coupled
through a Pd–Pd bond, as observed in other dinuclear Pd(I)
complexes [25].
J = 2.0 Hz, 4H). UV–Vis [CH2Cl2, kmax/nm (e
/L molÀ1 cmÀ1)]: 229
(8.68 Â 104), 300 (8.83 Â 104), 378 (6.67 Â 104), 485 (0.71 Â 104).
2.3. X-ray crystallography
3.2. Crystal structures
Data were collected with a Bruker SMART CCD area detector
using graphite monochromated Mo Ka radiation (0.71073 Å) at
room temperature. All empirical absorption corrections were ap-
plied by using the SADABS program [23]. The structures were solved
using direct methods and the corresponding non-hydrogen atoms
were refined anisotropically. All the hydrogen atoms of the ligands
were placed in calculated positions with fixed isotropic thermal
parameters and included in the structure factor calculations in
the final stage of full-matrix least-squares refinement. All calcula-
tions were performed using the SHELXTL computer program [24]. Ta-
ble 1 lists details of the crystal parameters, data collection and
refinement for complex 1. Table 2 lists the selected bond distances
and angles for complex 1.
Single crystal X-ray diffraction analysis reveals the solid state
structure of the complex
1 to be a di-palladium complex
[Pd2(L)2]. The molecular structure of the complex [Pd2(L)2] is de-
picted in Fig. 1. The palladium complex [Pd2(L)2] consists of two
metal centers bridged by two triazenido ligands in an
l, , -
g1 g1
fashion, with approximately linear two coordinate geometries
[N(1)–Pd1–(N3–2): 173.497o] with the deviation caused by the
metal atom moving away from each other.
Complex 1 is formed by the two N3-ligands and the {M2} unit
(M = Pd). The Pd–N bond distances in [Pd2(L)2] are within the ex-
pected ranges for terminal M(I)–N bonds [Pd–N: 2.0311(19) and
2.0125(20) Å] [25]. Similarly the N–N bond lengths within the tria-
zenido ligands [N(1)–N(2): 1.2969(24) Å, N(2)–N(3): 1.3044(28) Å
are also comparable to those observed in related systems [25].
The Pd–Pd distances of 2.4228(3) Å in complex 1 is consistent with
Table 1
Crystal data and structure refinements for complex 1.
Parameter
Complex 1
C24H16Pd2Cl4N6
744.26
0.71073
Empirical formula
Formula weight
k (Å)
Crystal system
Space group
a (Å)
monoclinic
P2(1)/c
8.4645
b (Å)
10.5335
c (Å)
14.0155
a
(°)
90.000
b (°)
93.451
c
(°)
90.000
1247.4
2
2.923
739.9
2.19–27.57
8275/2860
2860/0/163
1.032
V (Å3)
Z
Dc (Mg mÀ3
F(000)
h (°)
Reflections collected/unique
Data/restraints/parameters
Goodness-of-fit (GOF) on F2
)
Final R indices [I > 2
R indices (all data)
r(I)]
R1 = 0.0241, wR2 = 0.0598
R1 = 0.0329, wR2 = 0.0379
Fig. 1. Molecular structure of complex 1.