4024 J. Am. Chem. Soc., Vol. 121, No. 16, 1999
Drouin and Kukolich
ethylene ligand. Numerous theoretical studies15-17 have been
performed to assess the degree to which the tetracarbonyl iron
fragment can activate olefins. When detailed structural data are
available, the accuracy of the theoretical analyses can be better
evaluated. Further exploitation of the theory may help to
elucidate the remarkable properties of this molecule, including
a rich photochemistry,18 and catalytic activity in the isomer-
ization of alkenes.2
calculations in an effort to further test the application of DFT
in predicting gas-phase structures of organometallic complexes.
Experimental Section
The sample was prepared using the method of Murdoch and Weiss7
with only small modification. One gram of Fe2(CO)9 was placed in a
40 mL stainless steel bomb reactor with 10 mL of pentane. The bomb
was charged with 30 atm of ethylene by condensing 1.2 L of ethylene
at 1 atm into the bomb at -196 °C. The reaction was run for at least
2 days and then the excess ethylene was vented and the solvent was
removed under vacuum at -80 °C. The rest of the sample manipulation
was performed in a darkened laboratory, due to the high light sensitivity
of this compound.17 Exposure to fluorescent light caused rapid
decomposition as indicated by the production of a dark green compound
(Fe3(CO)12).
It is well-documented that one byproduct of this reaction, Fe(CO)5,
is extremely difficult to remove10,13 from the product C2H4Fe(CO)4.
Due to the nature of the microwave experiment, a highly pure sample
was not necessary for measurements of strong microwave transitions.
Therefore, a typical sample preparation involved only a partial
separation of the products. After solvent removal under vacuum at -80
°C, the bomb reactor was slowly warmed and the contents were
removed under vacuum into two fractions. The first fraction, containing
mostly pentacarbonyliron, was collected up to a temperature of -35
°C. The second fraction, containing mostly tetracarbonylethyleneiron,
was then collected from -35 to 0 °C. At this point little or no material
was observed to be leaving the bomb. Infrared analyses of the different
fractions revealed significant amounts of each product in both fractions,
and the overlap of peaks in the C-O and Fe-C stretching regions
was significant.
Microwave measurements were made in the 4-12 GHz range using
a Flygare-Balle type pulsed-beam Fourier transform microwave spec-
trometer.28 The sample from the second fraction was maintained at -35
°C, as the tetracarbonylethyleneiron was distilled into a small glass
sample cell by applying vacuum through the attached pulsed valve and
placing a small cup of liquid nitrogen (-196 °C) around the sample
cell. The pulse valve was then closed and the sample chamber filled
with 1 atm of Ne carrier gas. The cell was warmed to 0 °C. At lower
frequencies a pressure of 1.5 atm was seen to increase signal intensity.
Transitions measured are somewhat broadened due to unresolved
Doppler components and perhaps even unresolved spin-rotation cou-
pling. Greater broadening was observed for the perdeuterated sample,
presumably due to unresolved quadrupole splitting. The standard
deviations listed for the measured transitions listed in Tables 1-3 are
1σ. Systematic errors in the frequencies are expected to be much less
(1 part in 109) than the reported random errors because the spectrometer
is periodically calibrated to the frequency standard broadcast from
WWVH in Boulder, CO.
The title compound is structurally similar to the series of
dihydrides19-21 previously studied by this group, particularly
H2Fe(CO)4.20 The ethylene replaces the two hydride ligands
bound to the tetracarbonylferrate base. Both of these molecules
are thermal, light, and air sensitive. Chemically, the molecule
is much more similar to the η4- and η5-bound Fe systems also
studied by microwave spectroscopy.14,22-25 The tricarbonylcy-
clobutadieneiron,11,21 tricarbonylbutadieneiron,11,14 and tricar-
bonylcyclooctatetraeneiron23 species are all η4 type “piano-stool”
complexes with increasing stability in the order listed. The
sandwich compounds chloro- and bromoferrocene24,25 are both
very stable in comparison with the diene-iron-carbonyls, but
are less stable than the parent compound, ferrocene. Complete
gas-phase structures have been published for H2Fe(CO)419 and
14
C4H6Fe(CO)3 along with some structural data for C4H4Fe-
(CO)3 and the haloferrocenes.24,25 Previous electron diffrac-
21
tion11 work has shown that structural comparisons between these
species provide valuable insight into the characteristics of the
compounds and their reactivity. In the present work microwave
spectra for a large number of isotopomers are given and a very
detailed structure of the η2-bound ethylene complex is presented.
The experimental results, along with the DFT calculations
performed, provide a more complete view of structure and
bonding for the olefin-iron systems.
Density functional calculations are becoming increasingly
accurate and useful for describing structures of organometallic
systems. Previously the BPW9126 methods of Gaussian27 were
shown to reproduce the gas-phase structure of H2Fe(CO)419 with
great accuracy. It is useful to test the accuracy of quantum
chemical theories with relatively small systems to determine if
their application to larger structures is valid. Many of the iron
systems studied in this laboratory have been modeled using DFT
(15) Axe, F. U.; Marynick, D. S. J. Am.Chem. Soc. 1984, 106, 6230.
(16) Li, J.; Schreckenbach, G.; Ziegler, T. Inorg. Chem. 1995, 34, 3245.
(17) Albright, T. A.; Hoffman, R.; Thibeault, J. C.; Thorn, D. L. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1979, 101, 3801.
(18) Mitchener, J. C.; Wrighton, M. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1983, 105,
1065.
Interference was not expected from the major contaminant, iron
pentacarbonyl, since it is not expected to exhibit a microwave spectrum
because it has no permanent dipole moment. The microwave spectrum
of C2H4Fe(CO)4 was most readily measured from the second fraction
when the sample cell was held at 0 oC. Evidence for Fe(CO)5
contamination in the early part of the experiment was revealed by a
slowly growing signal intensity as the Fe(CO)5 distilled off. Often, after
several hours of scanning the signal intensity would grow to 3-10
times the initial intensity, this would last for about an hour, and then
the signal would drop to below half of the initial intensity. This behavior
is attributed to the gradual fractionation of the more volatile Fe(CO)5
out of the sample chamber, leaving mostly C2H4Fe(CO)4. Since this
molecule is highly volatile even at 0 °C, the purified sample rapidly
evaporates leaving only a small portion mixed with decomposition
products. The primary decomposition products, ethylene and Fe3(CO)12,
are also volatile and can thus diminish signal intensity also. The samples
were stored at -196 °C, and appeared to be thermally stable up to
-20 °C for extended periods of time, but low volatility of C2H4Fe-
(CO)4 at this temperature required the scanning to be done above -10
(19) Kukolich, S. G.; Sickafoose, S. M.; Breckenridge, S. M. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 205.
(20) Drouin, B. J.; Kukolich, S. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 6774.
(21) Lavaty, T. G.; Wikrent, P.; Drouin, B. J.; Kukolich S. G. J. Chem.
Phys. In press.
(22) Roehrig, M. A.; Wikrent, P.; Huber, S. R.; Wigley D. E.; Kukolich,
S. G. J. Mol. Spectrosc. 1992, 154, 355.
(23) Kukolich, S. G.; Breckenridge-Estes, S. M.; Sickafoose, S. M. Inorg.
Chem. 1997, 36, 4916.
(24) Drouin, B. J.; Cassak, P.; Kukolich, S. G. Inorg. Chem. 1996, 36,
2868.
(25) Drouin, B. J.; Lavaty, T. G.; Cassak, P. A.; Kukolich, S. G. J. Chem.
Phys. 1997, 107, 6541.
(26) (a) Becke, A. D. Phys. ReV. 1988, A 38, 3098. (b) ACS Symp. Ser.
1989, 394, 165. (c) Int. J. Quantum Chem. Symp. 1989, No. 23, 599. (d)
Perdew, J. P.; Wang, Y. Phys. ReV. 1992, B 45, 13, 244.
(27) Gaussian 94, Revision B.3; Frisch, M. J.; Trucks, G. W.; Schlegel,
H. B.; Gill, P. M. W.; Johnson, B. G.; Robb, M. A.; Cheeseman, J. R.;
Keith, T.; Petersson, G. A.; Montgomery, A. J.; Raghavachari, K.;
Al-Laham, M. A.; Zakrzewski, V. G.; Ortiz, J. V.; Foresman, J. B.; Peng,
C. Y.; Ayala, P. Y.; Chen, W.; Wong, M. W.; Andres, J. L.; Replogle, E.
S.; Gomperts, R.; Martin, R. L.; Fox, D. J.; Binkley, J. S.; Defrees, D. J.;
Baker, J.; Stewart, J. P.; Head-Gordon, M.; Gonzalez, C.; and Pople, J. A.
Gaussian, Inc.; Pittsburgh, PA, 1995.
(28) Bumgarner, R. E.; Kukolich, S. G. J. Chem. Phys. 1987, 86, 1083.