512
R. Yerrasani et al. / Journal of Molecular Liquids 216 (2016) 510–515
2.3. Physical measurements
ligand at 1631 cm−1 undergoes a hypsochromic shift to 1651 cm−1 in
all the complexes on account of zwitterionic formation; further, the ap-
pearance of a weak, broad band at 3189 cm−1 reflects the zwitterionic
(–C_N+H) nature of the ligand [22]. The vibrational modes of the coor-
dinating nitrate groups (C2v) appear at characteristic frequencies
around 1483–1467, 1290–1280 and 853–840 cm−1 in the LnIII com-
plexes [23]; the magnitude of splitting, 194–181 cm−1, at higher ener-
gies may be indicative of a bi-dentate ligation of the coordinated
nitrate groups [23,24]. The additional band observed at 1384 cm−1
may be attributed to the non-coordinated nitrate groups of the
complexes.
The 1H and 13C NMR spectra were recorded on a JEOL AL-300 MHz
FT-NMR multinuclear spectrometer; C, H, N contents were micro
analysed on Vario EL III Carlo Erba 1108 analyser. Infrared spectra
were recorded on JASCO FTIR (model-5300) spectrophotometer in
4000–400 cm−1 region. Mass spectrum was recorded on AB Sciex
TOF/TOF 5800 MALDI mass spectrometer. UV–VIS spectra were record-
ed on Shimadzu spectrophotometer, model, Pharmaspec UV-1700.
Emission spectra were recorded on JY HORIBA Fluorescence spectro-
photometer. The mesophases were identified by using polarized hot-
stage microscope (LOMO, USA) equipped with digital camera (Nikon
Coolpix 4500). Differential Scanning Calorimetry studies were made
on METTLER DSC-25 unit. Molar conductance of the complexes was de-
termined in 0.001 M solutions at room temperature on a CON 510 bench
conductivity metre (cell constant, K = 1.0). Thermogravimetric analysis
(TGA) (RT to 1000 °C) was performed on Perkin-Elmer-STA 6000 under
high purity nitrogen; The Raman spectrum of the ligand was recorded
on Raman spectrometer (Renishaw, UK) equipped with 785 nm lasers;
laser-induced heating in the sample was nullified by using 0.5% of the
diode laser (λ, 785 nm with maximum power of 300 mW) and the inci-
dent laser beam was focussed on the sample by a 50× long distance ob-
jective attached to a Leica DM 2500 M microscope; the Raman scattered
light was collected in back-scattering geometry by the same objective (a
grating of 1200 grooves/mm was used as the dispersion element); var-
iable temperature spectra ( 0.1 K) were recorded by using THM 600
hot stage and a dedicated computer with Wire 4.0 software.
3.2. 1H and 13C NMR spectral studies
The 1H and 13C{1H} NMR spectral data show that the phenolic–OH
signal at 14.09δ of the ligand disappears in the LaIII complex; during
coordination the phenolic protons of the ligand are shifted to the
imine nitrogens, which then get intra-molecularly hydrogen bonded
to the metal-bound phenolate oxygens giving rise to the zwitterionic
structure (_N+–H–O–) and the macrocycle under this condition is
designated as LH2 [25]. We found that the signal at 8.30δ of the imine
hydrogen (–CH_N) shifted to 7.93δ in the LaIII complex with the simul-
taneous formation of a new signal at 12.62δ, characteristic of –N+H res-
onance, in the latter; these observations are in good agreement with
systems reported previously [10,13,26]. The 13C NMR spectra show
a significant shift of the –N_CH– signal of the ligand (163.65δ) to
176.69δ in the LaIII complex. Shifts of similar magnitude were observed
in the case phenolate carbons (owing to direct attachment to the bond-
ing atom) while those observed for the other carbons were of lesser
magnitude. Thus, the NMR spectral data imply bonding through two
phenolate oxygens of the ligand in the zwitterionic form to the LaIII
metal ion.
3. Results and discussion
The structures of the ligand and the corresponding metal com-
plexes were studied by IR & NMR spectral techniques and elemental
analysis. The analytical data (Table 1) of the complexes corresponds
to 2:3 metal to ligand stoichiometry with the general formula
[Ln2(LH2)3(NO3)4](NO3)2. The IR and NMR spectral data imply
bidentate coordination through non-deprotonated zwitterionic form
of the ligand in the LnIII complexes. Further, molar conductance data
(160–165 Ω−1 cm2/mol) measured in 10−3 M DMF solutions corre-
sponds to 2:1 electrolytic behaviour [20] indicating the presence of
two of the six nitrate groups outside the coordination sphere.
3.3. Photophysical properties
The electronic spectra (Fig.1) of the ligand and the complexes were
recorded in chloroform and 3:1(v/v ratio) mixed solution of chloroform
and DMSO. Of the two intra-ligand bands, the one centred at 310 nm
may be due to π–π* transition localized on the aromatic ring while the
other at 405 nm is due to n–π* transition of the imine chromophore.
The spectra of the PrIII, SmIII, NdIII and DyIII complexes show consider-
able red shift in the λmax values in comparison with those of their corre-
sponding aqua ions [27]; these red shifts are presumably due to the
Nephelauxetic effect [28] and thus imply the extent of covalency of
the metal–ligand bond. Various bonding parameters (Table 3), viz.,
Nephelauxetic ratio (β), bonding parameter (b1/2), Sinha's parameter
(%δ) and covalency angular overlap parameter (η), calculated by the
procedures as reported in literature [29] suggest weak covalent nature
of the metal–ligand bonds.
3.1. IR spectral studies
The infrared spectral data assignments regarding bonding through
specific functional groups have been made by a careful comparison of
specific vibrational bands of H2L with the corresponding bands of the
LnIII complexes (Table 2). The broad band at 3441 cm−1 in the IR spec-
trum of the ligand, characteristic of phenolic–OH [21], may be under-
stood to involve considerable amount of intra molecular hydrogen
bonding with –C_N group. This band disappears in the spectra of the
complexes due to shifting of the phenolic proton to the azomethine
nitrogen resulting in the formation of zwitter ion. The νCN band of the
A photoluminescence spectrum of the ligand in CHCl3 solution,
when excited with monochromatic radiation of 390 nm, shows (Fig.1)
a λmax at 435 nm due to intra-ligand transition. The SmIII complex,
Table 2
IR spectral data of the lanthanide complexes of H2L.
H2L/Complex
ν(O–H) Phenolic
ν(N+H)
ν(C_O)
ν(C_N)
ν(C–O) phenolic
ν(NO3)
ionic
ν5
ν1
ν2
ν5–ν1
H2L
3441b
–
1728
1724
1728
1726
1731
1725
1724
1737
1631
1651
1650
1658
1651
1650
1651
1656
1142
1116
1118
1116
1117
1118
1118
1115
–
–
–
–
–
[La2(LH2)3(NO3)4](NO3)2
[Pr2(LH2)3(NO3)4](NO3)2
[Nd2(LH2)3(NO3)4](NO3)2
[Sm2(LH2)3(NO3)4](NO3)2
[Eu2(LH2)3(NO3)4](NO3)2
[Tb2(LH2)3(NO3)4](NO3)2
[Dy2(LH2)3(NO3)4](NO3)2
–
–
–
–
3189w
3189w
3193w
3193w
3193w
3179w
3196w
1384
1383
1383
1384
1383
1384
1384
1469
1467
1479
1479
1483
1469
1493
1280
1283
1287
1290
1289
1280
1312
846
846
845
853
841
846
846
189
184
192
189
194
189
181
–
b: broad, w: weak.