SCHEME 1. Syn th esis of Dia m in es 2a -c fr om
(-)-Cytisin e
at -78 °C for 5 h followed by warming to room temper-
ature, cyclooctene oxide 5 gave bicyclic alcohol (-)-6 in
84% yield and with 83:17 er (entry 1), virtually identical
with that reported by Hodgson et al. (81% yield, 85:15
er5) under comparable conditions. When the reactions
were carried out with diamines 1 and 2a -c (entries 2-5),
bicyclic alcohol (+)-6 was the major product (opposite
enantioselectivity to (-)-sparteine) and enantioselectivity
comparable to that obtained with (-)-sparteine (entry 1)
was observed with diamines 1 (81:19 er) and 2a (82:18
er) (entries 2 and 3), i.e., ligands that have the least
sterically demanding N-alkyl substituents. In contrast,
as the steric size of the N-alkyl group increased, the
enantioselectivity was compromised (entries 4-5): di-
amine 2c with the most sterically hindered N-alkyl group
t
(N-CH2 Bu) gave bicyclic alcohol (+)-6 in 53% yield and
with 66:34 er (entry 5). From this, we conclude that
sterically undemanding N-alkyl groups (e.g. N-Me in
1 and N-Et in 2a ) in (-)-cytisine-derived diamines
or conformationally constrained bispidines such as
(-)-sparteine are optimal for high enantioselectivity in
the R-lithiation rearrangement of cyclooctene oxide 5.
Next, the palladium(II)/diamine catalyzed oxidative
kinetic resolution of 1-indanol was used to evaluate the
enantioselectivity with the different diamines. The use
of palladium(II)/(-)-sparteine/oxygen as reagents for the
kinetic resolution of secondary alcohols (by oxidation to
the corresponding ketones) was independently reported
by the groups of Sigman6 and Stolz7 in 2001. Since then,
extensive efforts from both groups have resulted in
additional mechanistic insight17 (e.g., the role of excess
(-)-sparteine) and the development of new reagent
systems18 (e.g., the use of carbonate bases, tert-butyl
alcohol, as solvent or additive). In particular, these efforts
culminated in Bagdanoff and Stolz’s report of an opti-
mized room-temperature system that utilizes palladium-
(II)/(-)-sparteine/cesium carbonate in chloroform and
air.19 Surprisingly, despite all of the developments to
reaction conditions and significant efforts in addressing
substrate scope, there has been only one example of
ligand variation ((-)-R-isosparteine17d) since those in the
original disclosures6,7 (where (-)-sparteine was identified
as the optimum chiral ligand).
We limited the initial study described here to the
conditions originally reported by Ferraira and Stolz7 and
selected the resolution of 1-indanol rac-7 (actually one
of the worst substrates) as representative. Thus, 1-in-
danol rac-7 was subjected to reaction with palladium-
(II)/diamine/oxygen in toluene at 60 °C for 54 h and the
selectivity factor (s) was calculated by using the percent
conversion (C) to ketone 8 and the percent ee of the
unreacted 1-indanol 7.20 The results obtained with
the different diamines are shown in Table 2. With
(-)-sparteine, indanol (R)-7 was obtained as the major
TABLE 1. Eva lu a tion of Dia m in es in th e r-Lith ia tion
r ea r r a n gem en t of Cycloocten e Oxid e
entry
diaminea
major product yield (%)b
erc
1
2
3
4
5
(-)-sparteine (-)-6
84
70
72
53
53
83:17 (85:15)
19:81
18:82
27:73
34:66
1
(+)-6
(+)-6
(+)-6
(+)-6
2a
2b
2c
a
Reaction conditions: 2.4 equiv of sBuLi, 2.4 equiv of diamine,
b
Et2O, -78 °C, 5 h. Isolated yield of (-)- or (+)-6 after purification
by column chromatography. c Enantiomer ratio determined by
chiral HPLC (Daicel Chiralpak AD) of the 2,4-dinitrobenzoate (the
value in parentheses is the literature er under essentially the same
reaction conditions5).
of sec-butyllithium (or isopropyllithium) and 2.5 equiv of
(-)-sparteine (or (-)-R-isosparteine) in Et2O at -90 °C
(or -98 °C). For the R-lithiation rearrangement of cy-
clooctene oxide 5 into bicyclic alcohol 6, we carried out
our comparative study using commercially available sec-
butyllithium at the more convenient reaction tempera-
ture of -78 °C. The results are presented in Table 1. With
use of 2.4 equiv of sec-butyllithium/(-)-sparteine in Et2O
(13) For some representative examples, see: (a) Hodgson, D. M.;
Buxton, T. J .; Cameron, I. D.; Gras, E.; Kirton, E. H. M. Org. Biomol.
Chem. 2003, 1, 4293. (b) Hodgson, D. M.; Gras, E. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2002, 41, 2376. (c) Hodgson, D. M.; Stent, M. A. H.; Stefane, B.;
Wilson, F. X. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2003, 1, 1139. (d) Hodgson, D. M.;
Maxwell, C. R.; Miles, T. J .; Paruch, E.; Stent, M. A. H.; Matthews, I.
R.; Wilson, F. X.; Witherington, J . Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41,
4313. (e) Hodgson, D. M.; Maxwell, C. R.; Matthews, I. Tetrahedron:
Asymmetry 1999, 10, 1847. (f) Hodgson, D. M.; Robinson, L. A. Chem.
Commun. 1999, 309. (g) Hodgson, D. M.; Robinson, L. A.; J ones, M. L.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 8637.
(14) For a review, see: Hodgson, D. M.; Gras, E. Synthesis 2002,
1625.
(15) Hodgson, D. M.; Cameron, I. D.; Christlieb, M.; Green, R.; Lee,
G. P.; Robinson, L. A. J . Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 2001, 2161.
(16) (a) Hodgson, D. M.; Galano, J .-M.; Christlieb, M. Chem.
Commun. 2002, 2436. (b) Hodgson, D. M.; Galano, J .-M.; Christlieb,
M. Tetrahedron 2003, 59, 9719.
(17) (a) Mueller, J . A.; J ensen, D. R.; Sigman, M. S. J . Am. Chem.
Soc. 2002, 124, 8202. (b) J ensen, D. R.; Sigman, M. S. Org. Lett. 2003,
5, 63. (c) Mueller, J . A.; Sigman, M. S. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125,
7005. (d) Trend, R. K.; Stolz, B. M. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 4482.
(18) (a) Bagdanoff, J . T.; Ferreira, E. M.; Stolz, B. M. Org. Lett. 2003,
5, 835. (b) Mandal, S. K.; J ensen, D. R.; Pugsley, J . S.; Sigman, M. S.
J . Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 4600. (c) Mandal, S. K.; Sigman, M. S. J . Org.
Chem. 2003, 68, 7535. (d) Caspi, D. D.; Ebner, D. C.; Bagdanoff, J . T.;
Stolz, B. M. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2004, 346, 185.
(19) Bagdanoff, J . T.; Stolz, B. M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43,
353.
5790 J . Org. Chem., Vol. 69, No. 17, 2004