10.1002/cctc.201901827
ChemCatChem
FULL PAPER
Determination of optimal reaction temperature (Topt) for Thal-WT and
thermostable variants
Enzymatic bromination was assayed in a total volume of 200 μl under
comprising either
D
-/
L
- tryptophan or
D
-/
L
-6-bromotryptophan to provide
insight into altered enantiomer preference. In the resulting LC-MS chro-
matograms the expected diastereomer signals formed upon coupling with
FDAA were identified from the MS spectrum and comparison with au-
thentic standards. Therefore, after a reaction time of 24 h 100 µL reaction
sample was mixed with 50 µL 0.1 M aq. NaHCO3 solution and 50 µL
FDAA solution (10 mM in acetone) was added. The reaction sample was
incubated for 60 min at 40 °C in a thermoshaker to enable diastereomer
formation. The reaction was stopped by addition of 50 µL 0.1 M aq. HCl,
centrifuged (12000 × g, 10 min) and separated via LC-MS (see Support-
ing Information, Figure S9).
gentle shaking at 25 °C, 30 °C, 35 °C and 40 °C. Substrate L-tryptophan
was added to a final concentration of 5 mM together with 1 mM NAD+,
0.01 mM FAD, 1 U mL-1 RR-ADH, 2.5 U mL-1 PrnF, 5 % (v/v) iso-propanol,
10 mM Na2HPO4 pH 7.4 and 30 mM NaBr. Purified Thal-WT, Thal-GR or
Thal-GLV was added to a final concentration of 20 µM. Reactions were
performed as duplicate at the temperature indicated and after 22 h final
conversion was analyzed by analytical RP-HPLC. Conversion-
temperature profiles were obtained by plotting conversion of substrate
against reaction temperature (see Supporting Information, Figure S2).
Long-term stability assay of Thal-WT and Thal-GLV
Purified tryptophan halogenase (50 µM in 15 mM Na2HPO4, pH 7.4 and
30 mM NaBr) was stored at 40 °C in a thermoshaker for several hours. At
different time points an aliquot of 10 µL was taken and applied for enzy-
matic bromination at 25 °C. For this, the sample was mixed with 2 mM
Acknowledgements
We thank Prof. Dr. Karl-Heinz van Pée for providing the plasmid
encoding for the flavin reductase PrnF, as well as Prof. Dr. Wer-
ner Hummel for providing the plasmid encoding for the alcohol
dehydrogenase. In addition, we are grateful to Pia Ferle and
Henrik Terholsen (Bielefeld University) for supporting this project.
L
-tryptophan, 2.5 U mL-1 PrnF, 1 U mL-1 RR-ADH, 0.01 mM FAD, 1 mM
NAD+, 5 % (v/v) iso-propanol, 10 mM Na2HPO4 pH 7.4 and 30 mM NaBr
in a final volume of 100 µL. Reaction mixtures were incubated for 20 h at
25 °C in a thermoshaker (500 rpm) and afterwards aliquots of 50 µL were
taken and quenched by adding an equal volume of methanol. After
centrifugation (12000 × g, 10 min) the supernatant was analyzed by
analytical RP-HPLC. Measurements were performed as duplicate (see
Supporting Information, Table S4).
Keywords: directed evolution • enzyme catalysis • enzyme
stability • rational mutagenesis • tryptophan halogenase
Analysis of substrate panel of Thal-WT, Thal-S359G and Thal-GLV
The substrate scope of Thal-WT, Thal-S359G and Thal-GLV was tested
for the following substrates: phenol, methyl pyrrole-3-carboxylate, indole
[1]
U. T. Bornscheuer, G. W. Huisman, R. J. Kazlauskas, S. Lutz, J. C.
Moore, K. Robins, Nature 2012, 485, 185–194.
and tryptamine. L-Trp served as a positive control. In a total volume of
[2]
[3]
U. T. Bornscheuer, Philos. Trans. R. Soc., A 2018, 376, 20170063.
H. Renata, Z. J. Wang, F. H. Arnold, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54,
3351–3367.
100 µL, 1 mM substrate, 2.5 U mL–1 PrnF, 1 U mL-1 RR-ADH, 10 µM FAD,
1 mM NAD+, 15 mM Na2HPO4 pH 7.4, 30 mM NaBr and 5 % iso-propanol
were combined in a 96-well plate and purified tryptophan halogenase
was added in a final concentration of 80 µM. Reaction mixtures were
incubated for 24 h at 25 °C (500 rpm) and the reaction was stopped by
adding an equal volume of methanol (100 µL). After centrifugation
(4000 × g, 10 min) the supernatant was diluted with an equal volume of
water and analyzed by LC-MS. All reactions were performed as duplicate
(see Supporting Information, Table S5).
[4]
[5]
F. H. Arnold, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 4143–4148.
M. Z. Hernandes, S. M. T. Cavalcanti, D. R. M. Moreira, W. F. de
Azevedo Junior, A. C. L. Leite, Curr. Drug Targets 2010, 11, 303–314.
P. Jeschke, Pest Manag. Sci. 2010, 66, 10–27.
[6]
[7]
[8]
G. W. Gribble, Environ. Chem. 2015, 12, 396–405.
F. H. Vaillancourt, E. Yeh, D. A. Vosburg, S. Garneau-Tsodikova, C. T.
Walsh, Chem. Rev. 2006, 106, 3364–3378.
Comparison of Thal-WT and Thal-S359G catalyzed bromination of
[9]
K. Smith, G. A. El-Hiti, Curr. Org. Synth. 2004, 1, 253–274.
D
- and
Enzymatic bromination of
volume of 1 mL under shaking at 25 °C. Substrate
L-tryptophan
[10] C. D. Murphy, B. R. Clark, in Stereoselective Synthesis of Drugs and
Natural Products, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2013.
D- and
L
-tryptophan was assayed in a total
D
- or -tryptophan was
L
[11] M. Frese, P. H. Guzowska, H. Voß, N. Sewald, ChemCatChem 2014, 6,
1270–1276.
added to a final concentration of 1 mM together with 1 mM NAD+, 0.01
mM FAD, 1 U mL-1 RR-ADH, 2.5 U mL-1 PrnF, 5 % (v/v) iso-propanol, 10
mM Na2HPO4 pH 7.4 and 30 mM NaBr. Purified Thal-WT or Thal-S359G
was added to a final concentration of 7 µM. At different time points ali-
quots of 50 µL were taken from the reaction mixture and quenched by
adding an equal volume of methanol. The mixture was centrifuged
(12000 × g) and the supernatant was analyzed via analytical RP-HPLC to
determine conversion. All reactions were performed as duplicate. Analy-
sis of enantiomeric percentage was carried out by Marfey’s derivatization
described below.
[12] S. Keller, T. Wage, K. Hohaus, M. Hölzer, E. Eichhorn, K.-H. van Pée,
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 2300–2302.
[13] E. Yeh, S. Garneau, C. T. Walsh, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2005,
102, 3960–3965.
[14] D. Milbredt, E. P. Patallo, K.-H. van Pée, ChemBioChem 2014, 15,
1011–1020.
[15] S. Zehner, A. Kotzsch, B. Bister, R. D. Süssmuth, C. Méndez, J. A.
Salas, K.-H. van Pée, Chem. Biol. 2005, 12, 445–452.
[16] J. Latham, E. Brandenburger, S. A. Shepherd, B. R. K. Menon, J.
Micklefield, Chem. Rev. 2018, 118, 232–269.
Analysis of
via Marfey’s derivatization of reaction mixtures
Enzymatic bromination of a mixture comprising - and D-tryptophan in a
D-/L-tryptophan preference of Thal-WT and Thal-S359G
[17] M. Frese, N. Sewald, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 298–301.
[18] M. Frese, C. Schnepel, H. Minges, H. Voß, R. Feiner, N. Sewald,
ChemCatChem 2016, 8, 1799–1803.
L
ratio of 1:1 was assayed in a total volume of 1 mL under shaking at 25 °C
in 1.5 mL reaction tubes. The mixture of substrate enantiomers was
added to a final concentration of 1 mM (0.5 mM each) together with
1 mM NAD+, 0.01 mM FAD, 1 U mL-1 RR-ADH, 2.5 U mL-1 PrnF,
5 % (v/v) iso-propanol, 10 mM Na2HPO4 pH 7.4 and 30 mM NaBr. Puri-
fied Thal-WT or Thal-S359G were added to a final concentration of 7 µM.
Reactions were performed as duplicate and final conversion was moni-
tored by analytical RP-HPLC. Marfey’s derivatization of reaction mixtures
[19] A. D. Roy, R. J. M. Goss, G. K. Wagner, M. Winn, Chem. Commun.
2008, 4831.
[20] W. Runguphan, S. O'Connor, Org. Lett. 2013, 15, 2850-2853.
[21] E. Burda, W. Hummel, H. Gröger, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47,
9551–9554.
[22] H. Sato, W. Hummel, H. Gröger, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54,
4488–4492.
using Nα-(2,4-dinitro-5-fluorophenyl)-L-alaninamide (FDAA) combined
with LC-MS analysis permitted separation of resulting diastereomers
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.